<section xmlns="http://xml.house.gov/schemas/uslm/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" style="-uslm-lc:I80" id="id82d1a934-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6" identifier="/us/usc/t10/s191"><num value="191">§ 191.</num><heading> Secretary of Defense: authority to provide for common performance of supply or service activities</heading><subsection style="-uslm-lc:I11" class="indent0" id="id82d1a935-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6" identifier="/us/usc/t10/s191/a"><num value="a">(a)</num><heading> <inline class="small-caps">Authority</inline>.—</heading><content>Whenever the Secretary of Defense determines such action would be more effective, economical, or efficient, the Secretary may provide for the performance of a supply or service activity that is common to more than one military department by a single agency of the Department of Defense.</content>
</subsection>
<subsection style="-uslm-lc:I11" class="indent0" id="id82d1a936-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6" identifier="/us/usc/t10/s191/b"><num value="b">(b)</num><heading> <inline class="small-caps">Designation of Common Supply or Service Agency</inline>.—</heading><content>Any agency of the Department of Defense established under subsection (a) (or under the second sentence of <ref href="/us/usc/t10/s125/d">section 125(d) of this title</ref> (as in effect before <date date="1986-10-01">October 1, 1986</date>)) for the performance of a supply or service activity referred to in such subsection shall be designated as a Defense Agency or a Department of Defense Field Activity.</content>
</subsection>
<sourceCredit id="id82d1a937-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6">(Added <ref href="/us/pl/99/433/tIII">Pub. L. 99–433, title III</ref>, § 301(a)(2), <date date="1986-10-01">Oct. 1, 1986</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/100/1019">100 Stat. 1019</ref>; amended <ref href="/us/pl/100/26">Pub. L. 100–26</ref>, § 7(i)(1), <date date="1987-04-21">Apr. 21, 1987</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/101/282">101 Stat. 282</ref>.)</sourceCredit>
<notes type="uscNote" id="id82d1a938-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6">
<note style="-uslm-lc:I75" topic="referencesInText" id="id82d1a939-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6">
<heading class="centered smallCaps">References in Text</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0">Subsection (d) of <ref href="/us/usc/t10/s125">section 125 of this title</ref>, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by <ref href="/us/pl/99/433/s301/b/1">section 301(b)(1) of Pub. L. 99–433</ref>.</p>
</note>
<note style="-uslm-lc:I74" topic="priorProvisions" id="id82d1a93a-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6"><heading class="centered smallCaps">Prior Provisions</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0">A prior section 191 was renumbered <ref href="/us/usc/t10/s202">section 202 of this title</ref> and subsequently repealed.</p>
</note>
<note style="-uslm-lc:I74" topic="amendments" id="id82d1a93b-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6"><heading class="centered smallCaps">Amendments</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0">1987—Subsec. (b). <ref href="/us/pl/100/26">Pub. L. 100–26</ref> substituted “<date date="1986-10-01">October 1, 1986</date>” for “the date of the enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986”.</p>
</note>
<note style="-uslm-lc:I74" topic="miscellaneous" id="id82d1a93c-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6"><heading class="centered smallCaps">Comptroller General Review of Operations of Defense Logistics Agency</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0"><ref href="/us/pl/106/398">Pub. L. 106–398</ref>, § 1 [[div. A], title IX, § 917], <date date="2000-10-30">Oct. 30, 2000</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/114/1654">114 Stat. 1654</ref>, 1654A–232, directed the Comptroller General to review the operations of the Defense Logistics Agency and to submit to committees of Congress one or more reports setting forth the Comptroller General’s findings not later than <date date="2002-02-01">Feb. 1, 2002</date>.</p>
</note>
<note style="-uslm-lc:I74" topic="miscellaneous" id="id82d1a93d-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6"><heading class="centered smallCaps">Comptroller General Review of Operations of Defense Information Systems Agency</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0"><ref href="/us/pl/106/398">Pub. L. 106–398</ref>, § 1 [[div. A], title IX, § 918], <date date="2000-10-30">Oct. 30, 2000</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/114/1654">114 Stat. 1654</ref>, 1654A–232, directed the Comptroller General to review the operations of the Defense Information Systems Agency and to submit to committees of Congress one or more reports setting forth the Comptroller General’s findings not later than <date date="2002-02-01">Feb. 1, 2002</date>.</p>
</note>
<note style="-uslm-lc:I74" topic="miscellaneous" id="id82d1a93e-ec38-11e5-a7c9-8f2c075e98f6"><heading class="centered smallCaps">Reassessment of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0"><ref href="/us/pl/99/433/tIII">Pub. L. 99–433, title III</ref>, § 303, <date date="1986-10-01">Oct. 1, 1986</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/100/1023">100 Stat. 1023</ref>, directed Secretary of Defense to conduct a study of functions and organizational structure of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities to determine the most effective, economical, or efficient means of providing supply or service activities common to more than one military department, with Secretary to submit a report to Congress not later than <date date="1987-10-01">Oct. 1, 1987</date>. The report was to include a study of improved application of computer systems to functions of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, including a plan for rapid replacement, where necessary, of existing automated data processing equipment with new equipment, and plans to achieve reductions in total number of members of Armed Forces and civilian employees assigned or detailed to permanent duty in Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities (other than National Security Agency) by 5 percent, 10 percent, and 15 percent of total number of such members and employees projected to be assigned or detailed to such duty on <date date="1988-09-30">Sept. 30, 1988</date>, together with a discussion of implications of each such reduction and a draft of any legislation that would be required to implement each such plan.</p>
</note>
</notes>
</section>