<section xmlns="http://xml.house.gov/schemas/uslm/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" id="idc5828f4b-f63a-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t18/s17"><num value="17">§ 17.</num><heading> Insanity defense</heading><subsection class="indent0" id="idc5828f4c-f63a-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t18/s17/a"><num value="a">(a)</num><heading> Affirmative Defense.—</heading><content>It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under any Federal statute that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense.</content>
</subsection>
<subsection class="indent0" id="idc582b65d-f63a-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t18/s17/b"><num value="b">(b)</num><heading> Burden of Proof.—</heading><content>The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence.</content>
</subsection>
<sourceCredit id="idc582b65e-f63a-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d">
(Added <ref href="/us/pl/98/473/s402/a">Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 402(a)</ref>, <date date="1984-10-12">Oct. 12, 1984</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/98/2057">98 Stat. 2057</ref>, § 20; renumbered § 17, <ref href="/us/pl/99/646/s34/a">Pub. L. 99–646, § 34(a)</ref>, <date date="1986-11-10">Nov. 10, 1986</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/100/3599">100 Stat. 3599</ref>.)</sourceCredit>
</section>