<section xmlns="http://xml.house.gov/schemas/uslm/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" id="id3056c6d1-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb"><num value="2000bb">§ 2000bb.</num><heading> Congressional findings and declaration of purposes</heading><subsection class="indent0" id="id3056c6d2-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a"><num value="a">(a)</num><heading> Findings</heading>
<chapeau style="-uslm-lc:I11" class="blockIndent0">The Congress finds that—</chapeau><paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede3-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a/1"><num value="1">(1)</num><content> the framers of the Constitution, recognizing free exercise of religion as an unalienable right, secured its protection in the First Amendment to the Constitution;</content>
</paragraph>
<paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede4-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a/2"><num value="2">(2)</num><content> laws “neutral” toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise;</content>
</paragraph>
<paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede5-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a/3"><num value="3">(3)</num><content> governments should not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification;</content>
</paragraph>
<paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede6-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a/4"><num value="4">(4)</num><content> in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) the Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion; and</content>
</paragraph>
<paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede7-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/a/5"><num value="5">(5)</num><content> the compelling interest test as set forth in prior Federal court rulings is a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing prior governmental interests.</content>
</paragraph>
</subsection>
<subsection class="indent0" id="id3056ede8-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/b"><num value="b">(b)</num><heading> Purposes</heading>
<chapeau style="-uslm-lc:I11" class="blockIndent0">The purposes of this chapter are—</chapeau><paragraph class="indent1" id="id3056ede9-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/b/1"><num value="1">(1)</num><content> to restore the compelling interest test as set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) and to guarantee its application in all cases where free exercise of religion is substantially burdened; and</content>
</paragraph>
<paragraph class="indent1" id="id305714fa-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d" identifier="/us/usc/t42/s2000bb/b/2"><num value="2">(2)</num><content> to provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious exercise is substantially burdened by government.</content>
</paragraph>
</subsection>
<sourceCredit id="id305714fb-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d">
(<ref href="/us/pl/103/141/s2">Pub. L. 103–141, § 2</ref>, <date date="1993-11-16">Nov. 16, 1993</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/107/1488">107 Stat. 1488</ref>.)</sourceCredit>
<notes type="uscNote" id="id305714fc-f63c-11e2-8470-abc29ba29c4d">
<note topic="referencesInText">
<heading>References in Text</heading><p style="-uslm-lc:I21" class="indent0">This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original “this Act”, meaning <ref href="/us/pl/103/141">Pub. L. 103–141</ref>, <date date="1993-11-16">Nov. 16, 1993</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/107/1488">107 Stat. 1488</ref>, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.</p>
</note>
<note topic="constitutionality"><heading>Constitutionality</heading><p>For constitutionality of <ref href="/us/pl/103/141/s2">section 2 of Pub. L. 103–141</ref>, see Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Appendix 1, Acts of Congress Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court of the United States.</p>
</note>
<note topic="shortTitle"><heading>Short Title</heading><p><ref href="/us/pl/103/141/s1">Pub. L. 103–141, § 1</ref>, <date date="1993-11-16">Nov. 16, 1993</date>, <ref href="/us/stat/107/1488">107 Stat. 1488</ref>, provided that: <quotedContent origin="/us/pl/103/141/s1">“This Act [enacting this chapter and amending <ref href="/us/usc/t42/s1988">section 1988 of this title</ref> and <ref href="/us/usc/t5/s504">section 504 of Title 5</ref>, Government Organization and Employees] may be cited as the ‘Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993’.”</quotedContent>
</p>
</note>
</notes>
</section>