General powers of Commission
The Commission is authorized and empowered—
Investigations and data
Statements as to investment of licensees in projects; access to projects, maps, etc.
Cooperation with executive departments; information and aid furnished Commission
Publication of information, etc.; reports to Congress
Issue of licenses for construction, etc., of dams, conduits, reservoirs, etc.
Preliminary permits; notice of application
Investigation of occupancy for developing power; orders
Source
(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, § 4, 41 Stat. 1065; June 23, 1930, ch. 572, § 2, 46 Stat. 798; renumbered pt. I and amended, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §§ 202, 212, 49 Stat. 839, 847; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, § 205(a), 61 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, § 212,Notes
Amendments
Change of Name
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Savings Provision
affect the rights or jurisdiction of the United States, the States, Indian tribes, or other entities over waters of any river or stream or over any ground water resource;
alter, amend, repeal, interpret, modify, or be in conflict with any interstate compact made by the States;
alter or establish the respective rights of States, the United States, Indian tribes, or any person with respect to any water or water-related right;
affect, expand, or create rights to use transmission facilities owned by the Federal Government;
alter, amend, repeal, interpret, modify, or be in conflict with, the Treaty rights or other rights of any Indian tribe;
permit the filing of any competing application in any relicensing proceeding where the time for filing a competing application expired before the enactment of this Act [
modify, supersede, or affect the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act [16 U.S.C. 839 et seq.].”
Termination of Reporting Requirements
Promoting Hydropower Development at Nonpowered Dams and Closed Loop Pumped Storage Projects
In General.—
To improve the regulatory process and reduce delays and costs for hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as the ‘Commission’) shall investigate the feasibility of the issuance of a license for hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects in a 2-year period (referred to in this section as a ‘2-year process’). Such a 2-year process shall include any prefiling licensing process of the Commission.
Workshops and Pilots.—
The Commission shall—
not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
develop criteria for identifying projects featuring hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects that may be appropriate for licensing within a 2-year process;
not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, develop and implement pilot projects to test a 2-year process, if practicable; and
not later than 3 years after the date of implementation of the final pilot project testing a 2-year process, hold a final workshop to solicit public comment on the effectiveness of each tested 2-year process.
Memorandum of Understanding.—
The Commission shall, to the extent practicable, enter into a memorandum of understanding with any applicable Federal or State agency to implement a pilot project described in subsection (b).
Reports.—
Pilot projects not implemented.—
If the Commission determines that no pilot project described in subsection (b) is practicable because no 2-year process is practicable, not later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act [
describes the public comments received as part of the initial workshop held under subsection (b)(1); and
identifies the process, legal, environmental, economic, and other issues that justify the determination of the Commission that no 2-year process is practicable, with recommendations on how Congress may address or remedy the identified issues.
Pilot projects implemented.—
If the Commission develops and implements pilot projects involving a 2-year process, not later than 60 days after the date of completion of the final workshop held under subsection (b)(4), the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that—
describes the outcomes of the pilot projects;
describes the public comments from the final workshop on the effectiveness of each tested 2-year process; and
outlines how the Commission will adopt policies under existing law (including regulations) that result in a 2-year process for appropriate projects;
outlines how the Commission will issue new regulations to adopt a 2-year process for appropriate projects; or
identifies the process, legal, environmental, economic, and other issues that justify a determination of the Commission that no 2-year process is practicable, with recommendations on how Congress may address or remedy the identified issues.”
Improvement at Existing Federal Facilities
Water Conservation and Energy Production
Studies.—
The Secretary of the Interior, acting pursuant to the Federal reclamation laws (Act of
an analysis of the technical, environmental, and economic feasibility of reducing the amount of water diverted upstream of such Federal hydroelectric power generation facilities by Federal reclamation projects;
an estimate of the reduction, if any, of project power consumed as a result of the decreased amount of diversion;
an estimate of the increase in the amount of electrical energy and related revenues which would result from the marketing of such power by the Secretary;
an estimate of the fish and wildlife benefits which would result from the decreased or modified diversions;
a finding by the Secretary of the Interior that the activities proposed in the feasibility study can be carried out in accordance with applicable Federal and State law, interstate compacts and the contractual obligations of the Secretary; and
a finding by the affected Federal Power Marketing Administrator that the hydroelectric component of the proposed water conservation feature is cost-effective and that the affected Administrator is able to market the hydro-electric power expected to be generated.
Consultation.—
In preparing feasibility studies pursuant to this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall consult with, and seek the recommendations of, affected State, local and Indian tribal interests, and shall provide for appropriate public comment.
Authorization.—
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.”