Accredited persons
In general
Review and classification of devices
Requirements regarding review
In general
Time period for review
Special rule
Certain devices
In general
An accredited person may not be used to perform a review of—
a class III device;
a class II device which is intended to be permanently implantable or life sustaining or life supporting; or
a class II device which requires clinical data in the report submitted under section 360(k) of this title for the device, except that the number of class II devices to which the Secretary applies this clause for a year, less the number of such reports to which clauses (i) and (ii) apply, may not exceed 6 percent of the number that is equal to the total number of reports submitted to the Secretary under such section for such year less the number of such reports to which such clauses apply for such year.
Adjustment
Accreditation
Programs
Accreditation
In general
Withdrawal of accreditation
Performance auditing
To ensure that persons accredited under this section will continue to meet the standards of accreditation, the Secretary shall—
make onsite visits on a periodic basis to each accredited person to audit the performance of such person; and
take such additional measures as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Annual report
Periodic reaccreditation
Period
Response to reaccreditation request
Criteria
Qualifications
An accredited person shall, at a minimum, meet the following requirements:
Such person may not be an employee of the Federal Government.
Such person shall be an independent organization which is not owned or controlled by a manufacturer, supplier, or vendor of devices and which has no organizational, material, or financial affiliation with such a manufacturer, supplier, or vendor.
Such person shall be a legally constituted entity permitted to conduct the activities for which it seeks accreditation.
Such person shall not engage in the design, manufacture, promotion, or sale of devices.
The operations of such person shall be in accordance with generally accepted professional and ethical business practices and shall agree in writing that as a minimum it will—
certify that reported information accurately reflects data reviewed;
limit work to that for which competence and capacity are available;
treat information received, records, reports, and recommendations as proprietary information;
promptly respond and attempt to resolve complaints regarding its activities for which it is accredited; and
protect against the use, in carrying out subsection (a) of this section with respect to a device, of any officer or employee of the person who has a financial conflict of interest regarding the device, and annually make available to the public disclosures of the extent to which the person, and the officers and employees of the person, have maintained compliance with requirements under this clause relating to financial conflicts of interest.
Selection of accredited persons
Compensation of accredited persons
Duration
Report
Not later than
the number of devices reviewed under this section;
the number of devices reviewed under this section that were ultimately cleared by the Secretary;
the number of devices reviewed under this section that were ultimately not cleared by the Secretary;
the average time period for a review under this section (including the time it takes for the Secretary to review a recommendation of an accredited person under subsection (a) of this section and determine the initial device classification);
the average time period identified in paragraph (4) compared to the average time period for review of devices solely by the Secretary pursuant to section 360(k) of this title;
if there is a difference in the average time period under paragraph (4) and the average time period under paragraph (5), the reasons for such difference;
whether the quality of reviews under this section for devices for which no guidance has been issued is qualitatively inferior to reviews by the Secretary for devices for which no guidance has been issued;
whether the quality of reviews under this section of devices for which no guidance has been issued is qualitatively inferior to reviews under this section of devices for which guidance has been issued;
whether this section has in any way jeopardized or improved the public health;
any impact of this section on resources available to the Secretary to review reports under section 360(k) of this title; and
any suggestions for continuation, modification (including contraction or expansion of device eligibility), or termination of this section that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Source
(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 523, as added Pub. L. 105–115, title II, § 210(a),Notes
Amendments
Effective Date
Reports on Program of Accreditation
Comptroller general.—
Implementation of program.—
Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Evaluation of program.—
Not later than 6 months prior to the date on which, pursuant to subsection (c) of section 523 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 360m(c)] (as added by subsection (a)), the authority provided under subsection (a) of such section will terminate, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Commerce [now Committee on Energy and Commerce] of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources [now Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions] of the Senate a report describing the use of accredited persons under such section 523, including an evaluation of the extent to which such use assisted the Secretary in carrying out the duties of the Secretary under such Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] with respect to devices, and the extent to which such use promoted actions which are contrary to the purposes of such Act.
Inclusion of certain devices within program.—
Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [