Payments to hospitals for inpatient hospital services
Determination of costs for inpatient hospital services; limitations; exemptions; “operating costs of inpatient hospital services” defined
The Secretary, in determining the amount of the payments that may be made under this subchapter with respect to operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in paragraph (4)) shall not recognize as reasonable (in the efficient delivery of health services) costs for the provision of such services by a hospital for a cost reporting period to the extent such costs exceed the applicable percentage (as determined under clause (ii)) of the average of such costs for all hospitals in the same grouping as such hospital for comparable time periods.
For purposes of clause (i), the applicable percentage for hospital cost reporting periods beginning—
on or after
on or after
on or after
For purposes of subparagraph (A) the Secretary shall establish case mix indexes for all short-term hospitals, and shall set limits for each hospital based upon the general mix of types of medical cases with respect to which such hospital provides services for which payment may be made under this subchapter.
The Secretary shall set such limits for a cost reporting period of a hospital—
by updating available data for a previous period to the immediate preceding cost reporting period by the estimated average rate of change of hospital costs industry-wide, and
by projecting for the cost reporting period by the applicable percentage increase (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(B)).
The limitation established under subparagraph (A) for any hospital shall in no event be lower than the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in paragraph (4)) recognized under this subchapter for such hospital for such hospital’s last cost reporting period prior to the hospital’s first cost reporting period for which this section is in effect.
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
The Secretary shall provide for such exemptions from, and exceptions and adjustments to, the limitation established under paragraph (1)(A) as he deems appropriate, including those which he deems necessary to take into account—
the special needs of sole community hospitals, of new hospitals, of risk based health maintenance organizations, and of hospitals which provide atypical services or essential community services, and to take into account extraordinary circumstances beyond the hospital’s control, medical and paramedical education costs, significantly fluctuating population in the service area of the hospital, and unusual labor costs,
the special needs of psychiatric hospitals and of public or other hospitals that serve a significantly disproportionate number of patients who have low income or are entitled to benefits under part A of this subchapter, and
a decrease in the inpatient hospital services that a hospital provides and that are customarily provided directly by similar hospitals which results in a significant distortion in the operating costs of inpatient hospital services.
The limitation established under paragraph (1)(A) shall not apply with respect to any hospital which—
is located outside of a standard metropolitan statistical area, and
has less than 50 beds, and
was in operation and had less than 50 beds on
For purposes of this section, the term “operating costs of inpatient hospital services” includes all routine operating costs, ancillary service operating costs, and special care unit operating costs with respect to inpatient hospital services as such costs are determined on an average per admission or per discharge basis (as determined by the Secretary), and includes the costs of all services for which payment may be made under this subchapter that are provided by the hospital (or by an entity wholly owned or operated by the hospital) to the patient during the 3 days (or, in the case of a hospital that is not a subsection (d) hospital, during the 1 day) immediately preceding the date of the patient’s admission if such services are diagnostic services (including clinical diagnostic laboratory tests) or are other services related to the admission (as defined by the Secretary). Such term does not include costs of approved educational activities, a return on equity capital, other capital-related costs (as defined by the Secretary for periods before
on the date of the patient’s inpatient admission; or
during the 3 days (or, in the case of a hospital that is not a subsection (d) hospital, during the 1 day) immediately preceding the date of such admission unless the hospital demonstrates (in a form and manner, and at a time, specified by the Secretary) that such services are not related (as determined by the Secretary) to such admission.
Computation of payment; definitions; exemptions; adjustments
Notwithstanding section 1395f(b) of this title but subject to the provisions of section 1395e of this title, if the operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) of a hospital (other than a subsection (d) hospital, as defined in subsection (d)(1)(B) and other than a rehabilitation facility described in subsection (j)(1)) for a cost reporting period subject to this paragraph—
are less than or equal to the target amount (as defined in paragraph (3)) for that hospital for that period, the amount of the payment with respect to such operating costs payable under part A on a per discharge or per admission basis (as the case may be) shall be equal to the amount of such operating costs, plus—
15 percent of the amount by which the target amount exceeds the amount of the operating costs, or
2 percent of the target amount,
whichever is less;
are greater than the target amount but do not exceed 110 percent of the target amount, the amount of the payment with respect to those operating costs payable under part A on a per discharge basis shall equal the target amount; or
are greater than 110 percent of the target amount, the amount of the payment with respect to such operating costs payable under part A on a per discharge or per admission basis (as the case may be) shall be equal to (i) the target amount, plus (ii) in the case of cost reporting periods beginning on or after
plus the amount, if any, provided under paragraph (2), except that in no case may the amount payable under this subchapter (other than on the basis of a DRG prospective payment rate determined under subsection (d)) with respect to operating costs of inpatient hospital services exceed the maximum amount payable with respect to such costs pursuant to subsection (a).
Except as provided in subparagraph (E), in addition to the payment computed under paragraph (1), in the case of an eligible hospital (described in subparagraph (B)) for a cost reporting period beginning on or after
50 percent of the amount by which the operating costs are less than the expected costs (as defined in subparagraph (D)) for the period; or
1 percent of the target amount for the period.
For purposes of this paragraph, an “eligible hospital” means with respect to a cost reporting period, a hospital—
that has received payments under this subsection for at least 3 full cost reporting periods before that cost reporting period, and
whose operating costs for the period are less than the least of its target amount, its trended costs (as defined in subparagraph (C)), or its expected costs (as defined in subparagraph (D)) for the period.
For purposes of subparagraph (B)(ii), the term “trended costs” means for a hospital cost reporting period ending in a fiscal year—
in the case of a hospital for which its cost reporting period ending in fiscal year 1996 was its third or subsequent full cost reporting period for which it receives payments under this subsection, the lesser of the operating costs or target amount for that hospital for its cost reporting period ending in fiscal year 1996, or
in the case of any other hospital, the operating costs for that hospital for its third full cost reporting period for which it receives payments under this subsection,
increased (in a compounded manner) for each succeeding fiscal year (through the fiscal year involved) by the market basket percentage increase for the fiscal year.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “expected costs”, with respect to the cost reporting period ending in a fiscal year, means the lesser of the operating costs of inpatient hospital services or target amount per discharge for the previous cost reporting period updated by the market basket percentage increase (as defined in paragraph (3)(B)(iii)) for the fiscal year.
In the case of an eligible hospital that is a hospital or unit that is within a class of hospital described in clause (ii) with a 12-month cost reporting period beginning before
for a cost reporting period beginning on or after
for a cost reporting period beginning on or after
For purposes of clause (i), each of the following shall be treated as a separate class of hospital:
Hospitals described in clause (i) of subsection (d)(1)(B) and psychiatric units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (iv) of such subsection.
Except as provided in subparagraph (C) and succeeding subparagraphs, and in paragraph (7)(A)(ii), for purposes of this subsection, the term “target amount” means, with respect to a hospital for a particular 12-month cost reporting period—
in the case of the first such reporting period for which this subsection is in effect, the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) recognized under this subchapter for such hospital for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period, and
in the case of a later reporting period, the target amount for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period,
increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B) for that particular cost reporting period.
For purposes of subsection (d) and subsection (j) for discharges occurring during a fiscal year, the “applicable percentage increase” shall be—
for fiscal year 1986, ½ percent,
for fiscal year 1987, 1.15 percent,
for fiscal year 1988, 3.0 percent for hospitals located in a rural area, 1.5 percent for hospitals located in a large urban area (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)), and 1.0 percent for hospitals located in other urban areas,
for fiscal year 1989, the market basket percentage increase minus 1.5 percentage points for hospitals located in a rural area, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.0 percentage points for hospitals located in a large urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 2.5 percentage points for hospitals located in other urban areas,
for fiscal year 1990, the market basket percentage increase plus 4.22 percentage points for hospitals located in a rural area, the market basket percentage increase plus 0.12 percentage points for hospitals located in a large urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 0.53 percentage points for hospitals located in other urban areas,
for fiscal year 1991, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.0 percentage points for hospitals in a large urban or other urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 0.7 percentage point for hospitals located in a rural area,
for fiscal year 1992, the market basket percentage increase minus 1.6 percentage points for hospitals in a large urban or other urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 0.6 percentage point for hospitals located in a rural area,
for fiscal year 1993, the market basket percentage increase minus 1.55 percentage point for hospitals in a large urban or other urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 0.55 1
for fiscal year 1994, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.5 percentage points for hospitals located in a large urban or other urban area, and the market basket percentage increase minus 1.0 percentage point for hospitals located in a rural area,
for fiscal year 1995, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.5 percentage points for hospitals located in a large urban or other urban area, and such percentage increase for hospitals located in a rural area as will provide for the average standardized amount determined under subsection (d)(3)(A) for hospitals located in a rural area being equal to such average standardized amount for hospitals located in an urban area (other than a large urban area),
for fiscal year 1996, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.0 percentage points for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 1997, the market basket percentage increase minus 0.5 percentage point for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 1998, 0 percent,
for fiscal year 1999, the market basket percentage increase minus 1.9 percentage points for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 2000, the market basket percentage increase minus 1.8 percentage points for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 2001, the market basket percentage increase for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 2002, the market basket percentage increase minus 0.55 percentage points for hospitals in all areas,
for fiscal year 2003, the market basket percentage increase minus 0.55 percentage points for hospitals in all areas,
for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2006, subject to clause (vii), the market basket percentage increase for hospitals in all areas; 2
for each subsequent fiscal year, subject to clauses (viii), (ix), (xi), and (xii), the market basket percentage increase for hospitals in all areas.
For purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (E), the “applicable percentage increase” for 12-month cost reporting periods beginning during—
fiscal year 1986, is 0.5 percent,
fiscal year 1987, is 1.15 percent,
fiscal year 1988, is the market basket percentage increase minus 2.0 percentage points,
a subsequent fiscal year ending on or before
fiscal years 1994 through 1997, is the market basket percentage increase minus the applicable reduction (as defined in clause (v)(II)), or in the case of a hospital for a fiscal year for which the hospital’s update adjustment percentage (as defined in clause (v)(I)) is at least 10 percent, the market basket percentage increase,
for fiscal year 1998, is 0 percent,
for fiscal years 1999 through 2002, is the applicable update factor specified under clause (vi) for the fiscal year, and
subsequent fiscal years is the market basket percentage increase.
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “market basket percentage increase” means, with respect to cost reporting periods and discharges occurring in a fiscal year, the percentage, estimated by the Secretary before the beginning of the period or fiscal year, by which the cost of the mix of goods and services (including personnel costs but excluding nonoperating costs) comprising routine, ancillary, and special care unit inpatient hospital services, based on an index of appropriately weighted indicators of changes in wages and prices which are representative of the mix of goods and services included in such inpatient hospital services, for the period or fiscal year will exceed the cost of such mix of goods and services for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period or fiscal year.
For purposes of subparagraphs (C) and (D), the “applicable percentage increase” is—
for 12-month cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal years 1986 through 1993, the applicable percentage increase specified in clause (ii),
for fiscal year 1994, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.3 percentage points (adjusted to exclude any portion of a cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1993 for which the applicable percentage increase is determined under subparagraph (I)),
for fiscal year 1995, the market basket percentage increase minus 2.2 percentage points, and
for fiscal year 1996 and each subsequent fiscal year, the applicable percentage increase under clause (i).
For purposes of clause (ii)(V)—
a hospital’s “update adjustment percentage” for a fiscal year is the percentage by which the hospital’s allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services recognized under this subchapter for the cost reporting period beginning in fiscal year 1990 exceeds the hospital’s target amount (as determined under subparagraph (A)) for such cost reporting period, increased for each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1994) by the sum of any of the hospital’s applicable reductions under subclause (V) for previous fiscal years; and
the “applicable reduction” with respect to a hospital for a fiscal year is the lesser of 1 percentage point or the percentage point difference between 10 percent and the hospital’s update adjustment percentage for the fiscal year.
For purposes of clause (ii)(VII) for a fiscal year, if a hospital’s allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services recognized under this subchapter for the most recent cost reporting period for which information is available—
is equal to, or exceeds, 110 percent of the hospital’s target amount (as determined under subparagraph (A)) for such cost reporting period, the applicable update factor specified under this clause is the market basket percentage;
exceeds 100 percent, but is less than 110 percent, of such target amount for the hospital, the applicable update factor specified under this clause is 0 percent or, if greater, the market basket percentage minus 0.25 percentage points for each percentage point by which such allowable operating costs (expressed as a percentage of such target amount) is less than 110 percent of such target amount;
is equal to, or less than 100 percent, but exceeds ⅔ of such target amount for the hospital, the applicable update factor specified under this clause is 0 percent or, if greater, the market basket percentage minus 2.5 percentage points; or
does not exceed ⅔ of such target amount for the hospital, the applicable update factor specified under this clause is 0 percent.
For purposes of clause (i)(XIX) for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, in a case of a subsection (d) hospital that does not submit data to the Secretary in accordance with subclause (II) with respect to such a fiscal year, the applicable percentage increase under such clause for such fiscal year shall be reduced by 0.4 percentage points. Such reduction shall apply only with respect to the fiscal year involved, and the Secretary shall not take into account such reduction in computing the applicable percentage increase under clause (i)(XIX) for a subsequent fiscal year.
For fiscal years 2005 and 2006, each subsection (d) hospital shall submit to the Secretary quality data (for a set of 10 indicators established by the Secretary as of
For purposes of clause (i) for fiscal year 2007 and each subsequent fiscal year, in the case of a subsection (d) hospital that does not submit, to the Secretary in accordance with this clause, data required to be submitted on measures selected under this clause with respect to such a fiscal year, the applicable percentage increase under clause (i) for such fiscal year shall be reduced by 2.0 percentage points (or, beginning with fiscal year 2015, by one-quarter of such applicable percentage increase (determined without regard to clause (ix), (xi), or (xii))). Such reduction shall apply only with respect to the fiscal year involved and the Secretary shall not take into account such reduction in computing the applicable percentage increase under clause (i) for a subsequent fiscal year, and the Secretary and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission shall carry out the requirements under section 5001(b) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
Each subsection (d) hospital shall submit data on measures selected under this clause to the Secretary in a form and manner, and at a time, specified by the Secretary for purposes of this clause. The Secretary may require hospitals to submit data on measures that are not used for the determination of value-based incentive payments under subsection (o).
The Secretary shall expand, beyond the measures specified under clause (vii)(II) and consistent with the succeeding subclauses, the set of measures that the Secretary determines to be appropriate for the measurement of the quality of care (including medication errors) furnished by hospitals in inpatient settings.
Effective for payments beginning with fiscal year 2007, in expanding the number of measures under subclause (III), the Secretary shall begin to adopt the baseline set of performance measures as set forth in the November 2005 report by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences under section 238(b) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.
Effective for payments for fiscal years 2008 through 2012, the Secretary shall add other measures that reflect consensus among affected parties and, to the extent feasible and practicable, shall include measures set forth by one or more national consensus building entities.
For purposes of this clause and clause (vii), the Secretary may replace any measures or indicators in appropriate cases, such as where all hospitals are effectively in compliance or the measures or indicators have been subsequently shown not to represent the best clinical practice.
The Secretary shall establish procedures for making information regarding measures submitted under this clause available to the public. Such procedures shall ensure that a hospital has the opportunity to review the data that are to be made public with respect to the hospital prior to such data being made public. The Secretary shall report quality measures of process, structure, outcome, patients’ perspectives on care, efficiency, and costs of care that relate to services furnished in inpatient settings in hospitals on the Internet website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Effective for payments beginning with fiscal year 2013, with respect to quality measures for outcomes of care, the Secretary shall provide for such risk adjustment as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to maintain incentives for hospitals to treat patients with severe illnesses or conditions.
Subject to item (bb), effective for payments beginning with fiscal year 2013, each measure specified by the Secretary under this clause shall be endorsed by the entity with a contract under section 1395aaa(a) of this title.
In the case of a specified area or medical topic determined appropriate by the Secretary for which a feasible and practical measure has not been endorsed by the entity with a contract under section 1395aaa(a) of this title, the Secretary may specify a measure that is not so endorsed as long as due consideration is given to measures that have been endorsed or adopted by a consensus organization identified by the Secretary.
To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall, with input from consensus organizations and other stakeholders, take steps to ensure that the measures specified by the Secretary under this clause are coordinated and aligned with quality measures applicable to—
physicians under section 1395w–4(k) of this title; and
other providers of services and suppliers under this subchapter.
The Secretary shall establish a process to validate measures specified under this clause as appropriate. Such process shall include the auditing of a number of randomly selected hospitals sufficient to ensure validity of the reporting program under this clause as a whole and shall provide a hospital with an opportunity to appeal the validation of measures reported by such hospital.
With respect to a Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (or a successor survey) conducted on or after
The Secretary shall not include on the Hospital Compare internet website any measures based on the questions appearing on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey in 2018 or 2019 about communication by hospital staff with an individual about such individual’s pain.
For purposes of clause (i) for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, in the case of an eligible hospital (as defined in subsection (n)(6)) that is not a meaningful EHR user (as defined in subsection (n)(3)) for an EHR reporting period for such fiscal year, three-quarters of the applicable percentage increase otherwise applicable under clause (i) (determined without regard to clause (viii), (xi), or (xii)) for such fiscal year shall be reduced by 33⅓ percent for fiscal year 2015, 66⅔ percent for fiscal year 2016, and 100 percent for fiscal year 2017 and each subsequent fiscal year. Such reduction shall apply only with respect to the fiscal year involved and the Secretary shall not take into account such reduction in computing the applicable percentage increase under clause (i) for a subsequent fiscal year.
The Secretary may, on a case-by-case basis (and, with respect to the application of subclause (I) for fiscal year 2017, for categories of subsection (d) hospitals, as established by the Secretary and posted on the Internet website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services prior to
For fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, a State in which hospitals are paid for services under section 1395f(b)(3) of this title shall adjust the payments to each subsection (d) hospital in the State that is not a meaningful EHR user (as defined in subsection (n)(3)) in a manner that is designed to result in an aggregate reduction in payments to hospitals in the State that is equivalent to the aggregate reduction that would have occurred if payments had been reduced to each subsection (d) hospital in the State in a manner comparable to the reduction under the previous provisions of this clause. The State shall report to the Secretary the methodology it will use to make the payment adjustment under the previous sentence.
For purposes of this clause, the term “EHR reporting period” means, with respect to a fiscal year, any period (or periods) as specified by the Secretary.
The Secretary shall develop standard Internet website reports tailored to meet the needs of various stakeholders such as hospitals, patients, researchers, and policymakers. The Secretary shall seek input from such stakeholders in determining the type of information that is useful and the formats that best facilitate the use of the information.
The Secretary shall modify the Hospital Compare Internet website to make the use and navigation of that website readily available to individuals accessing it.
For 2012 and each subsequent fiscal year, after determining the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) and after application of clauses (viii) and (ix), such percentage increase shall be reduced by the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II).
The productivity adjustment described in this subclause, with respect to a percentage, factor, or update for a fiscal year, year, cost reporting period, or other annual period, is a productivity adjustment equal to the 10-year moving average of changes in annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multi-factor productivity (as projected by the Secretary for the 10-year period ending with the applicable fiscal year, year, cost reporting period, or other annual period).
The application of subclause (I) may result in the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this section for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year.
After determining the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i), and after application of clauses (viii), (ix), and (xi), the Secretary shall reduce such applicable percentage increase—
for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011, by 0.25 percentage point;
for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013, by 0.1 percentage point;
for fiscal year 2014, by 0.3 percentage point;
for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, by 0.2 percentage point; and
for each of fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, by 0.75 percentage point.
The application of this clause may result in the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this section for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year.
In the case of a hospital that is a sole community hospital (as defined in subsection (d)(5)(D)(iii)), subject to subparagraphs (I) and (L), the term “target amount” means—
with respect to the first 12-month cost reporting period in which this subparagraph is applied to the hospital—
the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) recognized under this subchapter for the hospital for the 12-month cost reporting period (in this subparagraph referred to as the “base cost reporting period”) preceding the first cost reporting period for which this subsection was in effect with respect to such hospital, increased (in a compounded manner) by—
the applicable percentage increases applied to such hospital under this paragraph for cost reporting periods after the base cost reporting period and up to and including such first 12-month cost reporting period,
with respect to a later cost reporting period beginning before fiscal year 1994, the target amount for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period, increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(iv) for discharges occurring in the fiscal year in which that later cost reporting period begins,
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 1994, the target amount for the cost reporting period beginning in fiscal year 1993 increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(iv), or
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 1995 and each subsequent fiscal year, the target amount for the preceding year increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(iv).
There shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period described in clause (i) a hospital’s cost reporting period (if any) beginning during fiscal year 1987 if such substitution results in an increase in the target amount for the hospital.
For cost reporting periods ending on or before
with respect to the first 12-month cost reporting period in which this subparagraph is applied to the hospital—
the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) recognized under this subchapter for the hospital for the 12-month cost reporting period (in this subparagraph referred to as the “base cost reporting period”) preceding the first cost reporting period for which this subsection was in effect with respect to such hospital, increased (in a compounded manner) by—
the applicable percentage increases applied to such hospital under this paragraph for cost reporting periods after the base cost reporting period and up to and including such first 12-month cost reporting period, or
with respect to a later cost reporting period beginning before fiscal year 1994, the target amount for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period, increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(iv) for discharges occurring in the fiscal year in which that later cost reporting period begins,
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 1994, the target amount for the cost reporting period beginning in fiscal year 1993 increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(iv), and
with respect to discharges occurring during fiscal year 1998 through fiscal year 2026 and the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
There shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period described in clause (i) a hospital’s cost reporting period (if any) beginning during fiscal year 1987 if such substitution results in an increase in the target amount for the hospital.
In the case of a hospital described in clause (v) of subsection (d)(1)(B), the term “target amount” means—
with respect to the first 12-month cost reporting period in which this subparagraph is applied to the hospital—
the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) recognized under this subchapter for the hospital for the 12-month cost reporting period (in this subparagraph referred to as the “base cost reporting period”) preceding the first cost reporting period for which this subsection was in effect with respect to such hospital, increased (in a compounded manner) by—
the sum of the applicable percentage increases applied to such hospital under this paragraph for cost reporting periods after the base cost reporting period and up to and including such first 12-month cost reporting period, or
with respect to a later cost reporting period, the target amount for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period, increased by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(ii) for that later cost reporting period.
There shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period described in clause (i) a hospital’s cost reporting period (if any) beginning during fiscal year 1987 if such substitution results in an increase in the target amount for the hospital.
In the case of a hospital (or unit described in the matter following clause (v) of subsection (d)(1)(B)) that received payment under this subsection for inpatient hospital services furnished during cost reporting periods beginning before
The average described in this clause for a hospital or unit shall be determined by the Secretary as follows:
The Secretary shall determine the allowable operating costs for inpatient hospital services for the hospital or unit for each of the 5 cost reporting periods for which the Secretary has the most recent settled cost reports as of
The Secretary shall increase the amount determined under subclause (I) for each cost reporting period by the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (B)(ii) for each subsequent cost reporting period up to the cost reporting period described in clause (i).
The Secretary shall identify among such 5 cost reporting periods the cost reporting periods for which the amount determined under subclause (II) is the highest, and the lowest.
The Secretary shall compute the averages of the amounts determined under subclause (II) for the 3 cost reporting periods not identified under subclause (III).
For purposes of this subparagraph, each of the following shall be treated as a separate class of hospital:
Hospitals described in clause (i) of subsection (d)(1)(B) and psychiatric units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (ii) of such subsection and rehabilitation units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (iii) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (iv) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (v) of such subsection.
In the case of a qualified long-term care hospital (as defined in clause (ii)) that elects (in a form and manner determined by the Secretary) this subparagraph to apply to the hospital, the target amount for the hospital’s 12-month cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1998 is equal to the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) recognized under this subchapter for the hospital for the 12-month cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1996, increased by the applicable percentage increase for the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1997.
In clause (i), a “qualified long-term care hospital” means, with respect to a cost reporting period, a hospital described in clause (iv) of subsection (d)(1)(B) during each of the 2 cost reporting periods for which the Secretary has the most recent settled cost reports as of
the hospital’s allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services recognized under this subchapter exceeded 115 percent of the hospital’s target amount, and
the hospital would have a disproportionate patient percentage of at least 70 percent (as determined by the Secretary under subsection (d)(5)(F)(vi)) if the hospital were a subsection (d) hospital.
In the case of a hospital or unit that is within a class of hospital described in clause (iv), for a cost reporting period beginning during fiscal years 1998 through 2002, the target amount for such a hospital or unit may not exceed the amount as updated up to or for such cost reporting period under clause (ii).
In the case of a hospital or unit that is within a class of hospital described in clause (iv), the Secretary shall estimate the 75th percentile of the target amounts for such hospitals within such class for cost reporting periods ending during fiscal year 1996, as adjusted under clause (iii).
The Secretary shall update the amount determined under subclause (I), for each cost reporting period after the cost reporting period described in such subclause and up to the first cost reporting period beginning on or after
For cost reporting periods beginning during each of fiscal years 1999 through 2002, subject to subparagraph (J), the Secretary shall update such amount by a factor equal to the market basket percentage increase.
In applying clause (ii)(I) in the case of a hospital or unit, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment to the labor-related portion of the amount determined under such subparagraph to take into account differences between average wage-related costs in the area of the hospital and the national average of such costs within the same class of hospital.
For purposes of this subparagraph, each of the following shall be treated as a separate class of hospital:
Hospitals described in clause (i) of subsection (d)(1)(B) and psychiatric units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (ii) of such subsection and rehabilitation units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (iv) of such subsection.
Subject to subparagraph (L), for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 2001, 75 percent of the amount otherwise applicable to the hospital under subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) (referred to in this clause as the “subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) amount”) and 25 percent of the rebased target amount (as defined in clause (ii));
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 2002, 50 percent of the subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) amount and 50 percent of the rebased target amount;
with respect to discharges occurring in fiscal year 2003, 25 percent of the subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) amount and 75 percent of the rebased target amount; and
with respect to discharges occurring after fiscal year 2003, 100 percent of the rebased target amount.
For purposes of this subparagraph, the “rebased target amount” has the meaning given the term “target amount” in subparagraph (C) except that—
there shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period the 12-month cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1996;
any reference in subparagraph (C)(i) to the “first cost reporting period” described in such subparagraph is deemed a reference to the first cost reporting period beginning on or after
applicable increase percentage shall only be applied under subparagraph (C)(iv) for discharges occurring in fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2002.
In no case shall a hospital be denied treatment as a sole community hospital or payment (on the basis of a target rate as such as a hospital) because data are unavailable for any cost reporting period due to changes in ownership, changes in fiscal intermediaries, or other extraordinary circumstances, so long as data for at least one applicable base cost reporting period is available.
For cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 2001, for a hospital described in subsection (d)(1)(B)(iv)—
the limiting or cap amount otherwise determined under subparagraph (H) shall be increased by 2 percent; and
the target amount otherwise determined under subparagraph (A) shall be increased by 25 percent (subject to the limiting or cap amount determined under subparagraph (H), as increased by clause (i)).
With respect to discharges occurring on or after
there shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period described in subparagraph (D)(i) the 12-month cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2002; and
any reference in such subparagraph to the “first cost reporting period” described in such subparagraph is deemed a reference to the first cost reporting period beginning on or after
This subparagraph shall only apply to a hospital if the substitution described in clause (i)(I) results in an increase in the target amount under subparagraph (D) for the hospital.
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “subparagraph (L) rebased target amount” has the meaning given the term “target amount” in subparagraph (C), except that—
there shall be substituted for the base cost reporting period the 12-month cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2006;
any reference in subparagraph (C)(i) to the “first cost reporting period” described in such subparagraph is deemed a reference to the first cost reporting period beginning on or after
the applicable percentage increase shall only be applied under subparagraph (C)(iv) for discharges occurring on or after
The Secretary shall provide for an exception and adjustment to (and in the case of a hospital described in subsection (d)(1)(B)(iii), may provide an exemption from) the method under this subsection for determining the amount of payment to a hospital where events beyond the hospital’s control or extraordinary circumstances, including changes in the case mix of such hospital, create a distortion in the increase in costs for a cost reporting period (including any distortion in the costs for the base period against which such increase is measured). The Secretary may provide for such other exemptions from, and exceptions and adjustments to, such method as the Secretary deems appropriate, including the assignment of a new base period which is more representative, as determined by the Secretary, of the reasonable and necessary cost of inpatient services and including those which he deems necessary to take into account a decrease in the inpatient hospital services that a hospital provides and that are customarily provided directly by similar hospitals which results in a significant distortion in the operating costs of inpatient hospital services. The Secretary shall announce a decision on any request for an exemption, exception, or adjustment under this paragraph not later than 180 days after receiving a completed application from the intermediary for such exemption, exception, or adjustment, and shall include in such decision a detailed explanation of the grounds on which such request was approved or denied.
The payment reductions under paragraph (3)(B)(ii)(V) shall not be considered by the Secretary in making adjustments pursuant to clause (i). In making such reductions, the Secretary shall treat the applicable update factor described in paragraph (3)(B)(vi) for a fiscal year as being equal to the market basket percentage for that year.
In determining under subparagraph (A) whether to assign a new base period which is more representative of the reasonable and necessary cost to a hospital of providing inpatient services, the Secretary shall take into consideration—
changes in applicable technologies and medical practices, or differences in the severity of illness among patients, that increase the hospital’s costs;
whether increases in wages and wage-related costs for hospitals located in the geographic area in which the hospital is located exceed the average of the increases in such costs paid by hospitals in the United States; and
such other factors as the Secretary considers appropriate in determining increases in the hospital’s costs of providing inpatient services.
Paragraph (1) shall not apply to payment of hospitals which is otherwise determined under paragraph (3) of section 1395f(b) of this title.
In the case of any hospital having any cost reporting period of other than a 12-month period, the Secretary shall determine the 12-month period which shall be used for purposes of this section.
In the case of any hospital which becomes subject to the taxes under section 3111 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with respect to any or all of its employees, for part or all of a cost reporting period, and was not subject to such taxes with respect to any or all of its employees for all or part of the 12-month base cost reporting period referred to in subsection (b)(3)(A)(i), the Secretary shall provide for an adjustment by increasing the base period amount described in such subsection for such hospital by an amount equal to the amount of such taxes which would have been paid or accrued by such hospital for such base period if such hospital had been subject to such taxes for all of such base period with respect to all its employees, minus the amount of any such taxes actually paid or accrued for such base period.
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case of a hospital or unit that is within a class of hospital described in subparagraph (B) which first receives payments under this section on or after
for each of the first 2 cost reporting periods for which the hospital has a settled cost report, the amount of the payment with respect to operating costs described in paragraph (1) under part A on a per discharge or per admission basis (as the case may be) is equal to the lesser of—
the amount of operating costs for such respective period, or
110 percent of the national median (as estimated by the Secretary) of the target amount for hospitals in the same class as the hospital for cost reporting periods ending during fiscal year 1996, updated by the hospital market basket increase percentage to the fiscal year in which the hospital first received payments under this section, as adjusted under subparagraph (C); and
for purposes of computing the target amount for the subsequent cost reporting period, the target amount for the preceding cost reporting period is equal to the amount determined under clause (i) for such preceding period.
For purposes of this paragraph, each of the following shall be treated as a separate class of hospital:
Hospitals described in clause (i) of subsection (d)(1)(B) and psychiatric units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (ii) of such subsection and rehabilitation units described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection.
Hospitals described in clause (iv) of such subsection.
In applying subparagraph (A)(i)(II) in the case of a hospital or unit, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment to the labor-related portion of the amount determined under such subparagraph to take into account differences between average wage-related costs in the area of the hospital and the national average of such costs within the same class of hospital.
Payment in accordance with State hospital reimbursement control system; amount of payment; discontinuance of payments
The Secretary may provide, in his discretion, that payment with respect to services provided by a hospital in a State may be made in accordance with a hospital reimbursement control system in a State, rather than in accordance with the other provisions of this subchapter, if the chief executive officer of the State requests such treatment and if—
the Secretary determines that the system, if approved under this subsection, will apply (i) to substantially all non-Federal acute care hospitals (as defined by the Secretary) in the State and (ii) to the review of at least 75 percent of all revenues or expenses in the State for inpatient hospital services and of revenues or expenses for inpatient hospital services provided under the State’s plan approved under subchapter XIX;
the Secretary has been provided satisfactory assurances as to the equitable treatment under the system of all entities (including Federal and State programs) that pay hospitals for inpatient hospital services, of hospital employees, and of hospital patients;
the Secretary has been provided satisfactory assurances that under the system, over 36-month periods (the first such period beginning with the first month in which this subsection applies to that system in the State), the amount of payments made under this subchapter under such system will not exceed the amount of payments which would otherwise have been made under this subchapter not using such system;
the Secretary determines that the system will not preclude an eligible organization (as defined in section 1395mm(b) of this title) from negotiating directly with hospitals with respect to the organization’s rate of payment for inpatient hospital services; and
the Secretary determines that the system requires hospitals to meet the requirement of section 1395cc(a)(1)(G) of this title and the system provides for the exclusion of certain costs in accordance with section 1395y(a)(14) of this title (except for such waivers thereof as the Secretary provides by regulation).
The Secretary cannot deny the application of a State under this subsection on the ground that the State’s hospital reimbursement control system is based on a payment methodology other than on the basis of a diagnosis-related group or on the ground that the amount of payments made under this subchapter under such system must be less than the amount of payments which would otherwise have been made under this subchapter not using such system. If the Secretary determines that the conditions described in subparagraph (C) are based on maintaining payment amounts at no more than a specified percentage increase above the payment amounts in a base period, the State has the option of applying such test (for inpatient hospital services under part A) on an aggregate payment basis or on the basis of the amount of payment per inpatient discharge or admission. If the Secretary determines that the conditions described in subparagraph (C) are based on maintaining aggregate payment amounts below a national average percentage increase in total payments under part A for inpatient hospital services, the Secretary cannot deny the application of a State under this subsection on the ground that the State’s rate of increase in such payments for such services must be less than such national average rate of increase.
In determining under paragraph (1)(C) the amount of payment which would otherwise have been made under this subchapter for a State, the Secretary may provide for appropriate adjustment of such amount to take into account previous reductions effected in the amount of payments made under this subchapter in the State due to the operation of the hospital reimbursement control system in the State if the system has resulted in an aggregate rate of increase in operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) under this subchapter for hospitals in the State which is less than the aggregate rate of increase in such costs under this subchapter for hospitals in the United States.
The Secretary shall discontinue payments under a system described in paragraph (1) if the Secretary—
determines that the system no longer meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1) and, if applicable, the requirements of paragraph (5), or
has reason to believe that the assurances described in subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (1) (or, if applicable, in paragraph (5)) are not being (or will not be) met.
The Secretary shall approve the request of a State under paragraph (1) with respect to a hospital reimbursement control system if—
the requirements of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1) have been met with respect to the system, and
with respect to that system a waiver of certain requirements of this subchapter has been approved on or before (and which is in effect as of)
With respect to a State system described in this paragraph, the Secretary shall judge the effectiveness of such system on the basis of its rate of increase or inflation in inpatient hospital payments for individuals under this subchapter, as compared to the national rate of increase or inflation for such payments, with the State retaining the option to have the test applied on the basis of the aggregate payments under the State system as compared to aggregate payments which would have been made under the national system since
The Secretary shall approve the request of a State under paragraph (1) with respect to a hospital reimbursement control system if—
the requirements of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1) have been met with respect to the system;
the Secretary determines that the system—
is operated directly by the State or by an entity designated pursuant to State law,
provides for payment of hospitals covered under the system under a methodology (which sets forth exceptions and adjustments, as well as any method for changes in the methodology) by which rates or amounts to be paid for hospital services during a specified period are established under the system prior to the defined rate period, and
hospitals covered under the system will make such reports (in lieu of cost and other reports, identified by the Secretary, otherwise required under this subchapter) as the Secretary may require in order to properly monitor assurances provided under this subsection;
the State has provided the Secretary with satisfactory assurances that operation of the system will not result in any change in hospital admission practices which result in—
a significant reduction in the proportion of patients (receiving hospital services covered under the system) who have no third-party coverage and who are unable to pay for hospital services,
a significant reduction in the proportion of individuals admitted to hospitals for inpatient hospital services for which payment is (or is likely to be) less than the anticipated charges for or costs of such services,
the refusal to admit patients who would be expected to require unusually costly or prolonged treatment for reasons other than those related to the appropriateness of the care available at the hospital, or
the refusal to provide emergency services to any person who is in need of emergency services if the hospital provides such services;
any change by the State in the system which has the effect of materially reducing payments to hospitals can only take effect upon 60 days notice to the Secretary and to the hospitals the payment to which is likely to be materially affected by the change; and
the State has provided the Secretary with satisfactory assurances that in the development of the system the State has consulted with local governmental officials concerning the impact of the system on public hospitals.
The Secretary shall respond to requests of States under this paragraph within 60 days of the date the request is submitted to the Secretary.
If the Secretary determines that the assurances described in paragraph (1)(C) have not been met with respect to any 36-month period, the Secretary may reduce payments under this subchapter to hospitals under the system in an amount equal to the amount by which the payment under this subchapter under such system for such period exceeded the amount of payments which would otherwise have been made under this subchapter not using such system.
In the case of a State which made a request under paragraph (5) before
in applying paragraphs (1)(C) and (6), a reference to a “36-month period” is deemed a reference to a “48-month period”, and
in order to allow the State the opportunity to provide the assurances described in paragraph (1)(C) for a 48-month period, the Secretary may not discontinue payments under the system, under the authority of paragraph (3)(A) because the Secretary has reason to believe that such assurances are not being (or will not be) met, before
Inpatient hospital service payments on basis of prospective rates; Medicare Geographical Classification Review Board
Notwithstanding section 1395f(b) of this title but subject to the provisions of section 1395e of this title, the amount of the payment with respect to the operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (a)(4)) of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in subparagraph (B)) for inpatient hospital discharges in a cost reporting period or in a fiscal year—
beginning on or after
the target percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the hospital’s target amount for the cost reporting period (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(A) of this section, but determined without the application of subsection (a)), and
the DRG percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the regional adjusted DRG prospective payment rate determined under paragraph (2) for such discharges;
beginning on or after
the target percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the hospital’s target amount for the cost reporting period (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(A), but determined without the application of subsection (a)), and
the DRG percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the applicable combined adjusted DRG prospective payment rate determined under subparagraph (D) for such discharges; or
beginning on or after
the national adjusted DRG prospective payment rate determined under paragraph (3) for such discharges, or
for discharges occurring during a fiscal year ending on or before
As used in this section, the term “subsection (d) hospital” means a hospital located in one of the fifty States or the District of Columbia other than—
a psychiatric hospital (as defined in section 1395x(f) of this title),
a rehabilitation hospital (as defined by the Secretary),
a hospital whose inpatients are predominantly individuals under 18 years of age,
a hospital which has an average inpatient length of stay (as determined by the Secretary) of greater than 25 days,
a hospital that the Secretary has classified, at any time on or before
a hospital that was recognized as a comprehensive cancer center or clinical cancer research center by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health as of
a hospital that was recognized as a clinical cancer research center by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health as of
a hospital that first received payment under this subsection in 1986 which has an average inpatient length of stay (as determined by the Secretary) of greater than 20 days and that has 80 percent or more of its annual medicare inpatient discharges with a principal diagnosis that reflects a finding of neoplastic disease in the 12-month cost reporting period ending in fiscal year 1997;
and, in accordance with regulations of the Secretary, does not include a psychiatric or rehabilitation unit of the hospital which is a distinct part of the hospital (as defined by the Secretary). A hospital that was classified by the Secretary on or before
For purposes of this subsection, for cost reporting periods beginning—
on or after
on or after
on or after
on or after
For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii)(II), the “applicable combined adjusted DRG prospective payment rate” for discharges occurring—
on or after
on or after
For purposes of subclauses (II) and (III) of subparagraph (B)(v) only, the term “principal finding of neoplastic disease” means the condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of a patient to a hospital, except that only discharges with ICD–9–CM principal diagnosis codes of 140 through 239, V58.0, V58.1, V66.1, V66.2, or 990 will be considered to reflect such a principal diagnosis.
The Secretary shall determine a national adjusted DRG prospective payment rate, for each inpatient hospital discharge in fiscal year 1984 involving inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) hospital in the United States, and shall determine a regional adjusted DRG prospective payment rate for such discharges in each region, for which payment may be made under part A of this subchapter. Each such rate shall be determined for hospitals located in urban or rural areas within the United States or within each such region, respectively, as follows:
Determining allowable individual hospital costs for base period.—
The Secretary shall determine the allowable operating costs per discharge of inpatient hospital services for the hospital for the most recent cost reporting period for which data are available.
Updating for fiscal year 1984.—
The Secretary shall update each amount determined under subparagraph (A) for fiscal year 1984 by—
updating for fiscal year 1983 by the estimated average rate of change of hospital costs industry-wide between the cost reporting period used under such subparagraph and fiscal year 1983 and the most recent case-mix data available, and
projecting for fiscal year 1984 by the applicable percentage increase (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(B)) for fiscal year 1984.
Standardizing amounts.—
The Secretary shall standardize the amount updated under subparagraph (B) for each hospital by—
excluding an estimate of indirect medical education costs (taking into account, for discharges occurring after
adjusting for variations among hospitals by area in the average hospital wage level,
adjusting for variations in case mix among hospitals, and
for discharges occurring on or after
Computing urban and rural averages.—
The Secretary shall compute an average of the standardized amounts determined under subparagraph (C) for the United States and for each region—
for all subsection (d) hospitals located in an urban area within the United States or that region, respectively, and
for all subsection (d) hospitals located in a rural area within the United States or that region, respectively.
For purposes of this subsection, the term “region” means one of the nine census divisions, comprising the fifty States and the District of Columbia, established by the Bureau of the Census for statistical and reporting purposes; the term “urban area” means an area within a Metropolitan Statistical Area (as defined by the Office of Management and Budget) or within such similar area as the Secretary has recognized under subsection (a) by regulation; the term “large urban area” means, with respect to a fiscal year, such an urban area which the Secretary determines (in the publications described in subsection (e)(5) before the fiscal year) has a population of more than 1,000,000 (as determined by the Secretary based on the most recent available population data published by the Bureau of the Census); and the term “rural area” means any area outside such an area or similar area. A hospital located in a Metropolitan Statistical Area shall be deemed to be located in the region in which the largest number of the hospitals in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area are located, or, at the option of the Secretary, the region in which the majority of the inpatient discharges (with respect to which payments are made under this subchapter) from hospitals in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area are made.
Reducing for value of outlier payments.—
The Secretary shall reduce each of the average standardized amounts determined under subparagraph (D) by a proportion equal to the proportion (estimated by the Secretary) of the amount of payments under this subsection based on DRG prospective payment rates which are additional payments described in paragraph (5)(A) (relating to outlier payments).
Maintaining budget neutrality.—
The Secretary shall adjust each of such average standardized amounts as may be required under subsection (e)(1)(B) for that fiscal year.
Computing drg-specific rates for urban and rural hospitals in the united states and in each region.—
For each discharge classified within a diagnosis-related group, the Secretary shall establish a national DRG prospective payment rate and shall establish a regional DRG prospective payment rate for each region, each of which is equal—
for hospitals located in an urban area in the United States or that region (respectively), to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under subparagraph (D), reduced under subparagraph (E), and adjusted under subparagraph (F)) for hospitals located in an urban area in the United States or that region, and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group; and
for hospitals located in a rural area in the United States or that region (respectively), to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under subparagraph (D), reduced under subparagraph (E), and adjusted under subparagraph (F)) for hospitals located in a rural area in the United States or that region, and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group.
Adjusting for different area wage levels.—
The Secretary shall adjust the proportion, (as estimated by the Secretary from time to time) of hospitals’ costs which are attributable to wages and wage-related costs, of the national and regional DRG prospective payment rates computed under subparagraph (G) for area differences in hospital wage levels by a factor (established by the Secretary) reflecting the relative hospital wage level in the geographic area of the hospital compared to the national average hospital wage level.
The Secretary shall determine a national adjusted DRG prospective payment rate, for each inpatient hospital discharge in a fiscal year after fiscal year 1984 involving inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) hospital in the United States, and shall determine, for fiscal years before fiscal year 1997, a regional adjusted DRG prospective payment rate for such discharges in each region for which payment may be made under part A of this subchapter. Each such rate shall be determined for hospitals located in large urban, other urban, or rural areas within the United States and within each such region, respectively, as follows:
Updating previous standardized amounts.—
For discharges occurring in a fiscal year beginning before
For discharges occurring in a fiscal year beginning on or after
For discharges occurring in the fiscal year beginning on
Subject to subclause (II), for discharges occurring in a fiscal year beginning on or after
For discharges occurring in a fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2004), the Secretary shall compute a standardized amount for hospitals located in any area within the United States and within each region equal to the standardized amount computed for the previous fiscal year under this subparagraph for hospitals located in a large urban area (or, beginning with fiscal year 2005, for all hospitals in the previous fiscal year) increased by the applicable percentage increase under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i) for the fiscal year involved.
Average standardized amounts computed under this paragraph shall be adjusted to reflect the most recent case-mix data available.
Insofar as the Secretary determines that the adjustments under paragraph (4)(C)(i) for a previous fiscal year (or estimates that such adjustments for a future fiscal year) did (or are likely to) result in a change in aggregate payments under this subsection during the fiscal year that are a result of changes in the coding or classification of discharges that do not reflect real changes in case mix, the Secretary may adjust the average standardized amounts computed under this paragraph for subsequent fiscal years so as to eliminate the effect of such coding or classification changes.
Reducing for value of outlier payments.—
The Secretary shall reduce each of the average standardized amounts determined under subparagraph (A) by a factor equal to the proportion of payments under this subsection (as estimated by the Secretary) based on DRG prospective payment amounts which are additional payments described in paragraph (5)(A) (relating to outlier payments).
Maintaining budget neutrality for fiscal year 1985.—
For discharges occurring in fiscal year 1985, the Secretary shall adjust each of such average standardized amounts as may be required under subsection (e)(1)(B) for that fiscal year.
Reducing for savings from amendment to indirect teaching adjustment for discharges after september 30, 1986.—
For discharges occurring after
Computing drg-specific rates for hospitals.—
For each discharge classified within a diagnosis-related group, the Secretary shall establish for the fiscal year a national DRG prospective payment rate and shall establish, for fiscal years before fiscal year 1997, a regional DRG prospective payment rate for each region which is equal—
for fiscal years before fiscal year 2004, for hospitals located in a large urban area in the United States or that region (respectively), to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under subparagraph (A), reduced under subparagraph (B), and adjusted or reduced under subparagraph (C)) for the fiscal year for hospitals located in such a large urban area in the United States or that region, and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group;
for fiscal years before fiscal year 2004, for hospitals located in other areas in the United States or that region (respectively), to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under subparagraph (A), reduced under subparagraph (B), and adjusted or reduced under subparagraph (C)) for the fiscal year for hospitals located in other areas in the United States or that region, and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group; and
for a fiscal year beginning after fiscal year 2003, for hospitals located in all areas, to the product of—
the applicable standardized amount (computed under subparagraph (A)), reduced under subparagraph (B), and adjusted or reduced under subparagraph (C) for the fiscal year; and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group.
Adjusting for different area wage levels.—
In general.—
Except as provided in clause (ii), (iii), or (iv), the Secretary shall adjust the proportion, (as estimated by the Secretary from time to time) of hospitals’ costs which are attributable to wages and wage-related costs, of the DRG prospective payment rates computed under subparagraph (D) for area differences in hospital wage levels by a factor (established by the Secretary) reflecting the relative hospital wage level in the geographic area of the hospital compared to the national average hospital wage level. Not later than
Alternative proportion to be adjusted beginning in fiscal year 2005.—
For discharges occurring on or after
Floor on area wage index for hospitals in frontier states.—
In general.—
Subject to subclause (IV), for discharges occurring on or after
Frontier state defined.—
In this clause, the term “frontier State” means a State in which at least 50 percent of the counties in the State are frontier counties.
Frontier county defined.—
In this clause, the term “frontier county” means a county in which the population per square mile is less than 6.
Limitation.—
This clause shall not apply to any hospital located in a State that receives a non-labor related share adjustment under paragraph (5)(H).
Floor on area wage index for hospitals in all-urban states.—
In general.—
For discharges occurring on or after
Minimum area wage index.—
For purposes of subclause (I), the Secretary shall establish a minimum area wage index for a fiscal year for hospitals in each all-urban State using the methodology described in section 412.64(h)(4)(vi) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect for fiscal year 2018.
Waiving budget neutrality.—
Pursuant to the fifth sentence of clause (i), this clause shall not be applied in a budget neutral manner.
All-urban state defined.—
In this clause, the term “all-urban State” means a State in which there are no rural areas (as defined in paragraph (2)(D)) or a State in which there are no hospitals classified as rural under this section.
The Secretary shall establish a classification of inpatient hospital discharges by diagnosis-related groups and a methodology for classifying specific hospital discharges within these groups.
For each such diagnosis-related group the Secretary shall assign an appropriate weighting factor which reflects the relative hospital resources used with respect to discharges classified within that group compared to discharges classified within other groups.
The Secretary shall adjust the classifications and weighting factors established under subparagraphs (A) and (B), for discharges in fiscal year 1988 and at least annually thereafter, to reflect changes in treatment patterns, technology (including a new medical service or technology under paragraph (5)(K)), and other factors which may change the relative use of hospital resources.
For discharges in fiscal year 1990, the Secretary shall reduce the weighting factor for each diagnosis-related group by 1.22 percent.
Any such adjustment under clause (i) for discharges in a fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1991) or payments under paragraph (5)(M) (beginning with fiscal year 2021) shall be made in a manner that assures that the aggregate payments under this subsection for discharges in the fiscal year are not greater or less than those that would have been made for discharges in the year without such adjustment or payments under paragraph (5)(M).
For discharges occurring during the emergency period described in section 1320b–5(g)(1)(B) of this title, in the case of a discharge of an individual diagnosed with COVID–19, the Secretary shall increase the weighting factor that would otherwise apply to the diagnosis-related group to which the discharge is assigned by 20 percent. The Secretary shall identify a discharge of such an individual through the use of diagnosis codes, condition codes, or other such means as may be necessary.
Any adjustment under subclause (I) shall not be taken into account in applying budget neutrality under clause (iii) 5
In the case of a State for which the Secretary has waived all or part of this section under the authority of section 1315a of this title, nothing in this section shall preclude such State from implementing an adjustment similar to the adjustment under subclause (I).
For discharges occurring on or after
A discharge described in this clause is a discharge which meets the following requirements:
The discharge includes a condition identified by a diagnosis code selected under clause (iv) as a secondary diagnosis.
But for clause (i), the discharge would have been classified to a diagnosis-related group that results in a higher payment based on the presence of a secondary diagnosis code selected under clause (iv).
At the time of admission, no code selected under clause (iv) was present.
As part of the information required to be reported by a hospital with respect to a discharge of an individual in order for payment to be made under this subsection, for discharges occurring on or after
By not later than
Cases described by such code have a high cost or high volume, or both, under this subchapter.
The code results in the assignment of a case to a diagnosis-related group that has a higher payment when the code is present as a secondary diagnosis.
The code describes such conditions that could reasonably have been prevented through the application of evidence-based guidelines.
The Secretary may from time to time revise (through addition or deletion of codes) the diagnosis codes selected under this clause so long as there are diagnosis codes associated with at least two conditions selected for discharges occurring during any fiscal year.
In selecting and revising diagnosis codes under clause (iv), the Secretary shall consult with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other appropriate entities.
Any change resulting from the application of this subparagraph shall not be taken into account in adjusting the weighting factors under subparagraph (C)(i) or in applying budget neutrality under subparagraph (C)(iii).
For discharges occurring during fiscal years ending on or before
For cases which are not included in clause (i), a subsection (d) hospital may request additional payments in any case where charges, adjusted to cost, exceed a fixed multiple of the applicable DRG prospective payment rate, or exceed such other fixed dollar amount, whichever is greater, or, for discharges in fiscal years beginning on or after
The amount of such additional payment under clauses (i) and (ii) shall be determined by the Secretary and shall (except as payments under clause (i) are required to be reduced to take into account the requirements of clause (v)) approximate the marginal cost of care beyond the cutoff point applicable under clause (i) or (ii).
The total amount of the additional payments made under this subparagraph for discharges in a fiscal year may not be less than 5 percent nor more than 6 percent of the total payments projected or estimated to be made based on DRG prospective payment rates for discharges in that year.
The Secretary shall provide that—
the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1995 shall be 75 percent of the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1994;
the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1996 shall be 50 percent of the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1994; and
the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1997 shall be 25 percent of the day outlier percentage for fiscal year 1994.
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “day outlier percentage” means, for a fiscal year, the percentage of the total additional payments made by the Secretary under this subparagraph for discharges in that fiscal year which are additional payments under clause (i).
The Secretary shall provide for an additional payment amount for subsection (d) hospitals with indirect costs of medical education, in an amount computed in the same manner as the adjustment for such costs under regulations (in effect as of
The amount of such additional payment shall be determined by multiplying (I) the sum of the amount determined under paragraph (1)(A)(ii)(II) (or, if applicable, the amount determined under paragraph (1)(A)(iii)) and, for cases qualifying for additional payment under subparagraph (A)(i), the amount paid to the hospital under subparagraph (A), by (II) the indirect teaching adjustment factor described in clause (ii).
For purposes of clause (i)(II), the indirect teaching adjustment factor is equal to c × (((1+r) to the nth power) −1), where “r” is the ratio of the hospital’s full-time equivalent interns and residents to beds and “n” equals .405. Subject to clause (ix), for discharges occurring—
on or after
during fiscal year 1998, “c” is equal to 1.72;
during fiscal year 1999, “c” is equal to 1.6;
during fiscal year 2000, “c” is equal to 1.47;
during fiscal year 2001, “c” is equal to 1.54;
during fiscal year 2002, “c” is equal to 1.6;
on or after
on or after
during fiscal year 2005, “c” is equal to 1.42;
during fiscal year 2006, “c” is equal to 1.37;
during fiscal year 2007, “c” is equal to 1.32; and
on or after
In determining such adjustment the Secretary shall not distinguish between those interns and residents who are employees of a hospital and those interns and residents who furnish services to a hospital but are not employees of such hospital.
Effective for discharges occurring on or after
Effective for discharges occurring on or after
In determining the adjustment with respect to a hospital for discharges occurring on or after
For purposes of clause (ii)—
“r” may not exceed the ratio of the number of interns and residents, subject to the limit under clause (v), with respect to the hospital for its most recent cost reporting period to the hospital’s available beds (as defined by the Secretary) during that cost reporting period, and
for the hospital’s cost reporting periods beginning on or after
In the case of the first cost reporting period beginning on or after
If any cost reporting period beginning on or after
Rules similar to the rules of paragraphs (2)(F)(iv) and (4)(H) of subsection (h) shall apply for purposes of clauses (v) and (vi).
For discharges occurring on or after
For discharges occurring on or after
The provisions of subparagraph (K) of subsection (h)(4) shall apply under this subparagraph in the same manner as they apply under such subsection.
In determining the hospital’s number of full-time equivalent residents for purposes of this subparagraph, all the time spent by an intern or resident in an approved medical residency training program in non-patient care activities, such as didactic conferences and seminars, as such time and activities are defined by the Secretary, that occurs in the hospital shall be counted toward the determination of full-time equivalency if the hospital—
is recognized as a subsection (d) hospital;
is recognized as a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital;
is reimbursed under a reimbursement system authorized under section 1395f(b)(3) of this title; or
is a provider-based hospital outpatient department.
In determining the hospital’s number of full-time equivalent residents for purposes of this subparagraph, all the time spent by an intern or resident in an approved medical residency training program in research activities that are not associated with the treatment or diagnosis of a particular patient, as such time and activities are defined by the Secretary, shall not be counted toward the determination of full-time equivalency.
For discharges occurring on or after
For discharges occurring on or after
The Secretary shall provide for such exceptions and adjustments to the payment amounts established under this subsection (other than under paragraph (9)) as the Secretary deems appropriate to take into account the special needs of regional and national referral centers (including those hospitals of 275 or more beds located in rural areas). A hospital which is classified as a rural hospital may appeal to the Secretary to be classified as a rural referral center under this clause on the basis of criteria (established by the Secretary) which shall allow the hospital to demonstrate that it should be so reclassified by reason of certain of its operating characteristics being similar to those of a typical urban hospital located in the same census region and which shall not require a rural osteopathic hospital to have more than 3,000 discharges in a year in order to be classified as a rural referral center. Such characteristics may include wages, scope of services, service area, and the mix of medical specialties. The Secretary shall publish the criteria not later than
The Secretary shall provide, under clause (i), for the classification of a rural hospital as a regional referral center if the hospital has a case mix index equal to or greater than the median case mix index for hospitals (other than hospitals with approved teaching programs) located in an urban area in the same region (as defined in paragraph (2)(D)), has at least 5,000 discharges a year or, if less, the median number of discharges in urban hospitals in the region in which the hospital is located (or, in the case of a rural osteopathic hospital, meets the criterion established by the Secretary under clause (i) with respect to the annual number of discharges for such hospitals), and meets any other criteria established by the Secretary under clause (i).
For any cost reporting period beginning on or after
an amount based on 100 percent of the hospital’s target amount for the cost reporting period, as defined in subsection (b)(3)(C), or
the amount determined under paragraph (1)(A)(iii),
whichever results in greater payment to the hospital.
In the case of a sole community hospital that experiences, in a cost reporting period compared to the previous cost reporting period, a decrease of more than 5 percent in its total number of inpatient cases due to circumstances beyond its control, the Secretary shall provide for such adjustment to the payment amounts under this subsection (other than under paragraph (9)) as may be necessary to fully compensate the hospital for the fixed costs it incurs in the period in providing inpatient hospital services, including the reasonable cost of maintaining necessary core staff and services.
For purposes of this subchapter, the term “sole community hospital” means any hospital—
that the Secretary determines is located more than 35 road miles from another hospital,
that, by reason of factors such as the time required for an individual to travel to the nearest alternative source of appropriate inpatient care (in accordance with standards promulgated by the Secretary), location, weather conditions, travel conditions, or absence of other like hospitals (as determined by the Secretary), is the sole source of inpatient hospital services reasonably available to individuals in a geographic area who are entitled to benefits under part A, or
that is located in a rural area and designated by the Secretary as an essential access community hospital under section 1395i–4(i)(1) of this title as in effect on
The Secretary shall promulgate a standard for determining whether a hospital meets the criteria for classification as a sole community hospital under clause (iii)(II) because of the time required for an individual to travel to the nearest alternative source of appropriate inpatient care.
If the Secretary determines that, in the case of a hospital located in a rural area and designated by the Secretary as an essential access community hospital under section 1395i–4(i)(1) of this title as in effect on
The Secretary shall estimate the amount of reimbursement made for services described in section 1395y(a)(14) of this title with respect to which payment was made under part B in the base reporting periods referred to in paragraph (2)(A) and with respect to which payment is no longer being made.
The Secretary shall provide for an adjustment to the payment for subsection (d) hospitals in each fiscal year so as appropriately to reflect the net amount described in clause (i).
Subject to subsection (r), for discharges occurring on or after
serves a significantly disproportionate number of low-income patients (as defined in clause (v)), or
is located in an urban area, has 100 or more beds, and can demonstrate that its net inpatient care revenues (excluding any of such revenues attributable to this subchapter or State plans approved under subchapter XIX), during the cost reporting period in which the discharges occur, for indigent care from State and local government sources exceed 30 percent of its total of such net inpatient care revenues during the period.
Subject to clause (ix), the amount of such payment for each discharge shall be determined by multiplying (I) the sum of the amount determined under paragraph (1)(A)(ii)(II) (or, if applicable, the amount determined under paragraph (1)(A)(iii)) and, for cases qualifying for additional payment under subparagraph (A)(i), the amount paid to the hospital under subparagraph (A) for that discharge, by (II) the disproportionate share adjustment percentage established under clause (iii) or (iv) for the cost reporting period in which the discharge occurs.
The disproportionate share adjustment percentage for a cost reporting period for a hospital described in clause (i)(II) is equal to 35 percent.
The disproportionate share adjustment percentage for a cost reporting period for a hospital that is not described in clause (i)(II) and that—
is located in an urban area and has 100 or more beds or is described in the second sentence of clause (v), is equal to the percent determined in accordance with the applicable formula described in clause (vii);
is located in an urban area and has less than 100 beds, is equal to 5 percent or, subject to clause (xiv) and for discharges occurring on or after
is located in a rural area and is not described in subclause (IV) or (V) or in the second sentence of clause (v), is equal to 4 percent or, subject to clause (xiv) and for discharges occurring on or after
is located in a rural area, is classified as a rural referral center under subparagraph (C), and is classified as a sole community hospital under subparagraph (D), is equal to 10 percent or, if greater, the percent determined in accordance with the applicable formula described in clause (viii) or, subject to clause (xiv) and for discharges occurring on or after
is located in a rural area, is classified as a rural referral center under subparagraph (C), and is not classified as a sole community hospital under subparagraph (D), is equal to the percent determined in accordance with the applicable formula described in clause (viii) or, subject to clause (xiv) and for discharges occurring on or after
is located in a rural area, is classified as a sole community hospital under subparagraph (D), and is not classified as a rural referral center under subparagraph (C), is 10 percent or, subject to clause (xiv) and for discharges occurring on or after
In this subparagraph, a hospital “serves a significantly disproportionate number of low income patients” for a cost reporting period if the hospital has a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) for that period which equals, or exceeds—
15 percent, if the hospital is located in an urban area and has 100 or more beds,
30 percent (or 15 percent, for discharges occurring on or after
40 percent (or 15 percent, for discharges occurring on or after
45 percent (or 15 percent, for discharges occurring on or after
A hospital located in a rural area and with 500 or more beds also “serves a significantly disproportionate number of low income patients” for a cost reporting period if the hospital has a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) for that period which equals or exceeds a percentage specified by the Secretary.
In this subparagraph, the term “disproportionate patient percentage” means, with respect to a cost reporting period of a hospital, the sum of—
the fraction (expressed as a percentage), the numerator of which is the number of such hospital’s patient days for such period which were made up of patients who (for such days) were entitled to benefits under part A of this subchapter and were entitled to supplementary security income benefits (excluding any State supplementation) under subchapter XVI of this chapter, and the denominator of which is the number of such hospital’s patient days for such fiscal year which were made up of patients who (for such days) were entitled to benefits under part A of this subchapter, and
the fraction (expressed as a percentage), the numerator of which is the number of the hospital’s patient days for such period which consist of patients who (for such days) were eligible for medical assistance under a State plan approved under subchapter XIX, but who were not entitled to benefits under part A of this subchapter, and the denominator of which is the total number of the hospital’s patient days for such period.
In determining under subclause (II) the number of the hospital’s patient days for such period which consist of patients who (for such days) were eligible for medical assistance under a State plan approved under subchapter XIX, the Secretary may, to the extent and for the period the Secretary determines appropriate, include patient days of patients not so eligible but who are regarded as such because they receive benefits under a demonstration project approved under subchapter XI.
The formula used to determine the disproportionate share adjustment percentage for a cost reporting period for a hospital described in clause (iv)(I) is—
in the case of such a hospital with a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) greater than 20.2—
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
in the case of any other such hospital—
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
Subject to clause (xiv), the formula used to determine the disproportionate share adjustment percentage for a cost reporting period for a hospital described in clause (iv)(IV) or (iv)(V) is the percentage determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−30)(.6) + 4.0, where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
In the case of discharges occurring—
during fiscal year 1998, the additional payment amount otherwise determined under clause (ii) shall be reduced by 1 percent;
during fiscal year 1999, such additional payment amount shall be reduced by 2 percent;
during fiscal years 2000 and 2001, such additional payment amount shall be reduced by 3 percent and 2 percent, respectively;
during fiscal year 2002, such additional payment amount shall be reduced by 3 percent; and
during fiscal year 2003 and each subsequent fiscal year, such additional payment amount shall be reduced by 0 percent.
Subject to clause (xiv), for purposes of clause (iv)(VI) (relating to sole community hospitals), in the case of a hospital for a cost reporting period with a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) that—
is less than 19.3, the disproportionate share adjustment percentage is determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−15)(.65) + 2.5;
is equal to or exceeds 19.3, but is less than 30.0, such adjustment percentage is equal to 5.25 percent; or
is equal to or exceeds 30, such adjustment percentage is equal to 10 percent,
where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
Subject to clause (xiv), for purposes of clause (iv)(V) (relating to rural referral centers), in the case of a hospital for a cost reporting period with a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) that—
is less than 19.3, the disproportionate share adjustment percentage is determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−15)(.65) + 2.5;
is equal to or exceeds 19.3, but is less than 30.0, such adjustment percentage is equal to 5.25 percent; or
is equal to or exceeds 30, such adjustment percentage is determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−30)(.6) + 5.25,
where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
Subject to clause (xiv), for purposes of clause (iv)(III) (relating to small rural hospitals generally), in the case of a hospital for a cost reporting period with a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) that—
is less than 19.3, the disproportionate share adjustment percentage is determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−15)(.65) + 2.5; or
is equal to or exceeds 19.3, such adjustment percentage is equal to 5.25 percent,
where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
Subject to clause (xiv), for purposes of clause (iv)(II) (relating to urban hospitals with less than 100 beds), in the case of a hospital for a cost reporting period with a disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)) that—
is less than 19.3, the disproportionate share adjustment percentage is determined in accordance with the following formula: (P−15)(.65) + 2.5; or
is equal to or exceeds 19.3, such adjustment percentage is equal to 5.25 percent,
where “P” is the hospital’s disproportionate patient percentage (as defined in clause (vi)).
In the case of discharges occurring on or after
Under subclause (I), the disproportionate share adjustment percentage shall not exceed 12 percent for a hospital that is not classified as a rural referral center under subparagraph (C) or, in the case of discharges occurring on or after
For any cost reporting period beginning on or after
The amount determined under this clause is—
for discharges occurring during the 36-month period beginning with the first day of the cost reporting period that begins on or after
for discharges occurring during any subsequent cost reporting period (or portion thereof) and before
In the case of a medicare dependent, small rural hospital that experiences, in a cost reporting period compared to the previous cost reporting period, a decrease of more than 5 percent in its total number of inpatient cases due to circumstances beyond its control, the Secretary shall provide for such adjustment to the payment amounts under this subsection (other than under paragraph (9)) as may be necessary to fully compensate the hospital for the fixed costs it incurs in the period in providing inpatient hospital services, including the reasonable cost of maintaining necessary core staff and services.
The term “medicare-dependent, small rural hospital” means, with respect to any cost reporting period to which clause (i) applies, any hospital—
that is located in—
a rural area; or
a State with no rural area (as defined in paragraph (2)(D)) and satisfies any of the criteria in subclause (I), (II), or (III) of paragraph (8)(E)(ii),
that has not more than 100 beds,
that is not classified as a sole community hospital under subparagraph (D), and
for which not less than 60 percent of its inpatient days or discharges during the cost reporting period beginning in fiscal year 1987, or two of the three most recently audited cost reporting periods for which the Secretary has a settled cost report, were attributable to inpatients entitled to benefits under part A.
Subclause (I)(bb) shall apply for purposes of payment under clause (ii) only for discharges of a hospital occurring on or after the effective date of a determination of medicare-dependent small rural hospital status made by the Secretary with respect to the hospital after
The Secretary may provide for such adjustments to the payment amounts under this subsection as the Secretary deems appropriate to take into account the unique circumstances of hospitals located in Alaska and Hawaii.
The Secretary shall provide by regulation for such other exceptions and adjustments to such payment amounts under this subsection as the Secretary deems appropriate.
In making adjustments under clause (i) for transfer cases (as defined by the Secretary) in a fiscal year, not taking in account the effect of subparagraph (J), the Secretary may make adjustments to each of the average standardized amounts determined under paragraph (3) to assure that the aggregate payments made under this subsection for such fiscal year are not greater or lesser than those that would have otherwise been made in such fiscal year.
The Secretary shall treat the term “transfer case” (as defined in subparagraph (I)(ii)) as including the case of a qualified discharge (as defined in clause (ii)), which is classified within a diagnosis-related group described in clause (iii), and which occurs on or after
50 percent of the amount of payment under this subsection for transfer cases (as established under subparagraph (I)(i)), and
50 percent of the amount of payment which would have been made under this subsection with respect to the qualified discharge if no transfer were involved.
For purposes of clause (i), subject to clause (iii), the term “qualified discharge” means a discharge classified with a diagnosis-related group (described in clause (iii)) of an individual from a subsection (d) hospital, if upon such discharge the individual—
is admitted as an inpatient to a hospital or hospital unit that is not a subsection (d) hospital for the provision of inpatient hospital services;
is admitted to a skilled nursing facility;
is provided home health services from a home health agency, if such services relate to the condition or diagnosis for which such individual received inpatient hospital services from the subsection (d) hospital, and if such services are provided within an appropriate period (as determined by the Secretary);
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
Subject to clause (iv), a diagnosis-related group described in this clause is—
1 of 10 diagnosis-related groups selected by the Secretary based upon a high volume of discharges classified within such groups and a disproportionate use of post discharge services described in clause (ii); and
a diagnosis-related group specified by the Secretary under clause (iv)(II).
The Secretary shall include in the proposed rule published under subsection (e)(5)(A) for fiscal year 2001, a description of the effect of this subparagraph. The Secretary shall include in the proposed rule published for fiscal year 2019, a description of the effect of clause (ii)(IV). The Secretary may include in the proposed rule (and in the final rule published under paragraph (6)) for fiscal year 2001 or a subsequent fiscal year, a description of—
post-discharge services not described in subclauses (I), (II), (III), and, in the case of proposed and final rules for fiscal year 2019 and subsequent fiscal years, (IV) of clause (ii), the receipt of which results in a qualified discharge; and
diagnosis-related groups described in clause (iii)(I) in addition to the 10 selected under such clause.
Effective for discharges beginning on or after
The mechanism established pursuant to clause (i) shall—
apply to a new medical service or technology if, based on the estimated costs incurred with respect to discharges involving such service or technology, the DRG prospective payment rate otherwise applicable to such discharges under this subsection is inadequate (applying a threshold specified by the Secretary that is the lesser of 75 percent of the standardized amount (increased to reflect the difference between cost and charges) or 75 percent of one standard deviation for the diagnosis-related group involved);
provide for the collection of data with respect to the costs of a new medical service or technology described in subclause (I) for a period of not less than two years and not more than three years beginning on the date on which an inpatient hospital code is issued with respect to the service or technology;
provide for additional payment to be made under this subsection with respect to discharges involving a new medical service or technology described in subclause (I) that occur during the period described in subclause (II) in an amount that adequately reflects the estimated average cost of such service or technology; and
provide that discharges involving such a service or technology that occur after the close of the period described in subclause (II) will be classified within a new or existing diagnosis-related group with a weighting factor under paragraph (4)(B) that is derived from cost data collected with respect to discharges occurring during such period.
For purposes of clause (ii)(II), the term “inpatient hospital code” means any code that is used with respect to inpatient hospital services for which payment may be made under this subsection and includes an alphanumeric code issued under the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (“ICD–9–CM”) and its subsequent revisions.
For purposes of clause (ii)(III), the term “additional payment” means, with respect to a discharge for a new medical service or technology described in clause (ii)(I), an amount that exceeds the prospective payment rate otherwise applicable under this subsection to discharges involving such service or technology that would be made but for this subparagraph.
The requirement under clause (ii)(III) for an additional payment may be satisfied by means of a new-technology group (described in subparagraph (L)), an add-on payment, a payment adjustment, or any other similar mechanism for increasing the amount otherwise payable with respect to a discharge under this subsection. The Secretary may not establish a separate fee schedule for such additional payment for such services and technologies, by utilizing a methodology established under subsection (a) or (h) of section 1395m of this title to determine the amount of such additional payment, or by other similar mechanisms or methodologies.
For purposes of this subparagraph and subparagraph (L), a medical service or technology will be considered a “new medical service or technology” if the service or technology meets criteria established by the Secretary after notice and an opportunity for public comment.
Under the mechanism under this subparagraph, the Secretary shall provide for the addition of new diagnosis and procedure codes in April 1 of each year, but the addition of such codes shall not require the Secretary to adjust the payment (or diagnosis-related group classification) under this subsection until the fiscal year that begins after such date.
The mechanism established pursuant to clause (i) shall be adjusted to provide, before publication of a proposed rule, for public input regarding whether a new service or technology represents an advance in medical technology that substantially improves the diagnosis or treatment of individuals entitled to benefits under part A as follows:
The Secretary shall make public and periodically update a list of all the services and technologies for which an application for additional payment under this subparagraph is pending.
The Secretary shall accept comments, recommendations, and data from the public regarding whether the service or technology represents a substantial improvement.
The Secretary shall provide for a meeting at which organizations representing hospitals, physicians, such individuals, manufacturers, and any other interested party may present comments, recommendations, and data to the clinical staff of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services before publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding whether service or technology represents a substantial improvement.
Before establishing any add-on payment under this subparagraph with respect to a new technology, the Secretary shall seek to identify one or more diagnosis-related groups associated with such technology, based on similar clinical or anatomical characteristics and the cost of the technology. Within such groups the Secretary shall assign an eligible new technology into a diagnosis-related group where the average costs of care most closely approximate the costs of care of using the new technology. No add-on payment under this subparagraph shall be made with respect to such new technology and this clause shall not affect the application of paragraph (4)(C)(iii).
In establishing the mechanism under subparagraph (K), the Secretary may establish new-technology groups into which a new medical service or technology will be classified if, based on the estimated average costs incurred with respect to discharges involving such service or technology, the DRG prospective payment rate otherwise applicable to such discharges under this subsection is inadequate.
Such groups—
shall not be based on the costs associated with a specific new medical service or technology; but
shall, in combination with the applicable standardized amounts and the weighting factors assigned to such groups under paragraph (4)(B), reflect such cost cohorts as the Secretary determines are appropriate for all new medical services and technologies that are likely to be provided as inpatient hospital services in a fiscal year.
The methodology for classifying specific hospital discharges within a diagnosis-related group under paragraph (4)(A) or a new-technology group shall provide that a specific hospital discharge may not be classified within both a diagnosis-related group and a new-technology group.
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant” means, with respect to an individual, the intravenous infusion of hematopoietic cells derived from bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells, or cord blood, but not including embryonic stem cells, of a donor to an individual that are or may be used to restore hematopoietic function in such individual having an inherited or acquired deficiency or defect.
The Secretary shall provide for publication in the Federal Register, on or before the August 1 before each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1984), of a description of the methodology and data used in computing the adjusted DRG prospective payment rates under this subsection, including any adjustments required under subsection (e)(1)(B).
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395oo of this title or otherwise of—
the determination of the requirement, or the proportional amount, of any adjustment effected pursuant to subsection (e)(1) or the determination of the applicable percentage increase under paragraph (12)(A)(ii),
the establishment of diagnosis-related groups, of the methodology for the classification of discharges within such groups, and of the appropriate weighting factors thereof under paragraph (4), including the selection and revision of codes under paragraph (4)(D), and
the determination of whether services provided prior to a patient’s inpatient admission are related to the admission (as described in subsection (a)(4)).
In the case of any hospital which is located in an area which is, at any time after
For the first such cost reporting period, payment shall be equal to the amount payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of the rural classification, plus an amount equal to two-thirds of the amount (if any) by which—
the amount which would have been payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of an urban classification, exceeds
the amount payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of the rural classification.
For the second such cost reporting period, payment shall be equal to the amount payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of the rural classification, plus an amount equal to one-third of the amount (if any) by which—
the amount which would have been payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of an urban classification, exceeds
the amount payable to such hospital for such reporting period on the basis of the rural classification.
For purposes of this subsection, the Secretary shall treat a hospital located in a rural county adjacent to one or more urban areas as being located in the urban metropolitan statistical area to which the greatest number of workers in the county commute, if the rural county would otherwise be considered part of an urban area, under the standards for designating Metropolitan Statistical Areas (and for designating New England County Metropolitan Areas) described in clause (ii), if the commuting rates used in determining outlying counties (or, for New England, similar recognized areas) were determined on the basis of the aggregate number of resident workers who commute to (and, if applicable under the standards, from) the central county or counties of all contiguous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (or New England County Metropolitan Areas).
The standards described in this clause for cost reporting periods beginning in a fiscal year—
before fiscal year 2003, are the standards published in the Federal Register on
after fiscal year 2002, are the standards published in the Federal Register by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget based on the most recent available decennial population data.
Subparagraphs (C) and (D) shall not apply with respect to the application of subclause (I).
If the application of subparagraph (B) or a decision of the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board or the Secretary under paragraph (10), by treating hospitals located in a rural county or counties as being located in an urban area, or by treating hospitals located in one urban area as being located in another urban area—
reduces the wage index for that urban area (as applied under this subsection) by 1 percentage point or less, the Secretary, in calculating such wage index under this subsection, shall exclude those hospitals so treated, or
reduces the wage index for that urban area by more than 1 percentage point (as applied under this subsection), the Secretary shall calculate and apply such wage index under this subsection separately to hospitals located in such urban area (excluding all the hospitals so treated) and to the hospitals so treated (as if such hospitals were located in such urban area).
If the application of subparagraph (B) or a decision of the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board or the Secretary under paragraph (10), by treating hospitals located in a rural county or counties as not being located in the rural area in a State, reduces the wage index for that rural area (as applied under this subsection), the Secretary shall calculate and apply such wage index under this subsection as if the hospitals so treated had not been excluded from calculation of the wage index for that rural area.
The application of subparagraph (B) or a decision of the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board or the Secretary under paragraph (10) may not result in the reduction of any county’s wage index to a level below the wage index for rural areas in the State in which the county is located.
The application of subparagraph (B) or a decision of the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board or of the Secretary under paragraph (10) may not result in a reduction in an urban area’s wage index if—
the urban area has a wage index below the wage index for rural areas in the State in which it is located; or
the urban area is located in a State that is composed of a single urban area.
This subparagraph shall apply with respect to discharges occurring in a fiscal year only if the Secretary uses a method for making adjustments to the DRG prospective payment rate for area differences in hospital wage levels under paragraph (3)(E) for the fiscal year that is based on the use of Metropolitan Statistical Area classifications.
The Secretary shall make a proportional adjustment in the standardized amounts determined under paragraph (3) to assure that the provisions of subparagraphs (B) and (C) or a decision of the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board or the Secretary under paragraph (10) do not result in aggregate payments under this section that are greater or less than those that would otherwise be made.
For purposes of this subsection, not later than 60 days after the receipt of an application (in a form and manner determined by the Secretary) from a subsection (d) hospital described in clause (ii), the Secretary shall treat the hospital as being located in the rural area (as defined in paragraph (2)(D)) of the State in which the hospital is located.
For purposes of clause (i), a subsection (d) hospital described in this clause is a subsection (d) hospital that is located in an urban area (as defined in paragraph (2)(D)) and satisfies any of the following criteria:
The hospital is located in a rural census tract of a metropolitan statistical area (as determined under the most recent modification of the Goldsmith Modification, originally published in the Federal Register on
The hospital is located in an area designated by any law or regulation of such State as a rural area (or is designated by such State as a rural hospital).
The hospital would qualify as a rural, regional, or national referral center under paragraph (5)(C) or as a sole community hospital under paragraph (5)(D) if the hospital were located in a rural area.
The hospital meets such other criteria as the Secretary may specify.
Notwithstanding section 1395f(b) of this title but subject to the provisions of section 1395e of this title, the amount of the payment with respect to the operating costs of inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital for inpatient hospital discharges is equal to the sum of—
the applicable Puerto Rico percentage (specified in subparagraph (E)) of the Puerto Rico adjusted DRG prospective payment rate (determined under subparagraph (B) or (C)) for such discharges,
the applicable Federal percentage (specified in subparagraph (E)) of—
for discharges beginning in a fiscal year beginning on or after
the national adjusted DRG prospective payment rate (determined under paragraph (3)(D)) for hospitals located in a large urban area,
such rate for hospitals located in other urban areas, and
such rate for hospitals located in a rural area,
for such discharges, adjusted in the manner provided in paragraph (3)(E) for different area wage levels; and
for discharges in a fiscal year beginning on or after
As used in this section, the term “subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital” means a hospital that is located in Puerto Rico and that would be a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in paragraph (1)(B)) if it were located in one of the 50 States.
The Secretary shall determine a Puerto Rico adjusted DRG prospective payment rate, for each inpatient hospital discharge in fiscal year 1988 involving inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital for which payment may be made under part A of this subchapter. Such rate shall be determined for such hospitals located in urban or rural areas within Puerto Rico, as follows:
The Secretary shall determine the target amount (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(A)) for the hospital for the cost reporting period beginning in fiscal year 1987 and increase such amount by prorating the applicable percentage increase (as defined in subsection (b)(3)(B)) to update the amount to the midpoint in fiscal year 1988.
The Secretary shall standardize the amount determined under clause (i) for each hospital by—
excluding an estimate of indirect medical education costs,
adjusting for variations among hospitals by area in the average hospital wage level,
adjusting for variations in case mix among hospitals, and
excluding an estimate of the additional payments to certain subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals to be made under subparagraph (D)(iii) (relating to disproportionate share payments).
The Secretary shall compute a discharge weighted average of the standardized amounts determined under clause (ii) for all hospitals located in an urban area and for all hospitals located in a rural area (as such terms are defined in paragraph (2)(D)).
The Secretary shall reduce the average standardized amount by a proportion equal to the proportion (estimated by the Secretary) of the amount of payments under this paragraph which are additional payments described in subparagraph (D)(i) (relating to outlier payments).
For each discharge classified within a diagnosis-related group for hospitals located in an urban or rural area, respectively, the Secretary shall establish a Puerto Rico DRG prospective payment rate equal to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under clause (iii) and reduced under clause (iv)) for hospitals located in an urban or rural area, respectively, and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group.
The Secretary shall adjust the proportion (as estimated by the Secretary from time to time) of hospitals’ costs which are attributable to wages and wage-related costs, of the Puerto Rico DRG prospective payment rate computed under clause (v) for area differences in hospital wage levels by a factor (established by the Secretary) reflecting the relative hospital wage level in the geographic area of the hospital compared to the Puerto Rican average hospital wage level.
The Secretary shall determine a Puerto Rico adjusted DRG prospective payment rate, for each inpatient hospital discharge after fiscal year 1988 involving inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital for which payment may be made under part A of this subchapter. Such rate shall be determined for hospitals located in urban or rural areas within Puerto Rico as follows:
For discharges in a fiscal year after fiscal year 1988 and before fiscal year 2004, the Secretary shall compute an average standardized amount for hospitals located in an urban area and for hospitals located in a rural area equal to the respective average standardized amount computed for the previous fiscal year under subparagraph (B)(iii) or under this clause, increased for fiscal year 1989 by the applicable percentage increase under subsection (b)(3)(B), and adjusted for subsequent fiscal years in accordance with the final determination of the Secretary under subsection (e)(4), and adjusted to reflect the most recent case-mix data available.
For discharges occurring in a fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2004), the Secretary shall compute an average standardized amount for hospitals located in any area of Puerto Rico that is equal to the average standardized amount computed under subclause (I) for fiscal year 2003 for hospitals in a large urban area (or, beginning with fiscal year 2005, for all hospitals in the previous fiscal year) increased by the applicable percentage increase under subsection (b)(3)(B) for the fiscal year involved.
The Secretary shall reduce each of the average standardized amounts (or for fiscal year 2004 and thereafter, the average standardized amount) by a proportion equal to the proportion (estimated by the Secretary) of the amount of payments under this paragraph which are additional payments described in subparagraph (D)(i) (relating to outlier payments).
For each discharge classified within a diagnosis-related group for hospitals located in an urban or rural area, respectively, the Secretary shall establish a Puerto Rico DRG prospective payment rate equal to the product of—
the average standardized amount (computed under clause (i) and reduced under clause (ii)), and
the weighting factor (determined under paragraph (4)(B)) for that diagnosis-related group.
The Secretary shall adjust the proportion (as estimated by the Secretary from time to time) of hospitals’ costs which are attributable to wages and wage-related costs, of the Puerto Rico DRG prospective payment rate computed under clause (iii) for area differences in hospital wage levels by a factor (established by the Secretary) reflecting the relative hospital wage level in the geographic area of the hospital compared to the Puerto Rico average hospital wage level. The second and third sentences of paragraph (3)(E)(i) shall apply to subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals under this clause in the same manner as they apply to subsection (d) hospitals under such paragraph and, for purposes of this clause, any reference in such paragraph to a subsection (d) hospital is deemed a reference to a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital.
For discharges occurring on or after
The following provisions of paragraph (5) shall apply to subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals receiving payment under this paragraph in the same manner and to the extent as they apply to subsection (d) hospitals receiving payment under this subsection:
Subparagraph (A) (relating to outlier payments).
Subparagraph (B) (relating to payments for indirect medical education costs), except that for this purpose the sum of the amount determined under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph and the amount paid to the hospital under clause (i) of this subparagraph shall be substituted for the sum referred to in paragraph (5)(B)(i)(I).
Subparagraph (F) (relating to disproportionate share payments), except that for this purpose the sum described in clause (ii) of this subparagraph shall be substituted for the sum referred to in paragraph (5)(F)(ii)(I).
Subparagraph (H) (relating to exceptions and adjustments).
For purposes of subparagraph (A), for discharges occurring—
on or after
on or after
on or after
on or after
on or after
There is hereby established the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as the “Board”).
The Board shall be composed of 5 members appointed by the Secretary without regard to the provisions of title 5, governing appointments in the competitive service. Two of such members shall be representative of subsection (d) hospitals located in a rural area under paragraph (2)(D). At least 1 member shall be knowledgeable in the field of analyzing costs with respect to the provision of inpatient hospital services.
The Secretary shall make initial appointments to the Board as provided in this paragraph within 180 days after
The Board shall consider the application of any subsection (d) hospital requesting that the Secretary change the hospital’s geographic classification for purposes of determining for a fiscal year—
the hospital’s average standardized amount under paragraph (2)(D), or
the factor used to adjust the DRG prospective payment rate for area differences in hospital wage levels that applies to such hospital under paragraph (3)(E).
A hospital requesting a change in geographic classification under clause (i) for a fiscal year shall submit its application to the Board not later than the first day of the 13-month period ending on September 30 of the preceding fiscal year.
The Board shall render a decision on an application submitted under clause (i) not later than 180 days after the deadline referred to in clause (ii).
Appeal of decisions of the Board shall be subject to the provisions of section 557b 7
The Secretary shall publish guidelines to be utilized by the Board in rendering decisions on applications submitted under this paragraph, and shall include in such guidelines the following:
Guidelines for comparing wages, taking into account (to the extent the Secretary determines appropriate) occupational mix, in the area in which the hospital is classified and the area in which the hospital is applying to be classified.
Guidelines for determining whether the county in which the hospital is located should be treated as being a part of a particular Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Guidelines for considering information provided by an applicant with respect to the effects of the hospital’s geographic classification on access to inpatient hospital services by medicare beneficiaries.
Guidelines for considering the appropriateness of the criteria used to define New England County Metropolitan Areas.
Notwithstanding clause (i), if the Secretary uses a method for making adjustments to the DRG prospective payment rate for area differences in hospital wage levels under paragraph (3)(E) that is not based on the use of Metropolitan Statistical Area classifications, the Secretary may revise the guidelines published under clause (i) to the extent such guidelines are used to determine the appropriateness of the geographic area in which the hospital is determined to be located for purposes of making such adjustments.
Under the guidelines published by the Secretary under clause (i), in the case of a hospital which has ever been classified by the Secretary as a rural referral center under paragraph (5)(C), the Board may not reject the application of the hospital under this paragraph on the basis of any comparison between the average hourly wage of the hospital and the average hourly wage of hospitals in the area in which it is located.
The Secretary shall publish the guidelines described in clause (i) by
Any decision of the Board to reclassify a subsection (d) hospital for purposes of the adjustment factor described in subparagraph (C)(i)(II) for fiscal year 2001 or any fiscal year thereafter shall be effective for a period of 3 fiscal years, except that the Secretary shall establish procedures under which a subsection (d) hospital may elect to terminate such reclassification before the end of such period.
Such guidelines shall provide that, in making decisions on applications for reclassification for the purposes described in clause (v) for fiscal year 2003 and any succeeding fiscal year, the Board shall base any comparison of the average hourly wage for the hospital with the average hourly wage for hospitals in an area on—
an average of the average hourly wage amount for the hospital from the most recently published hospital wage survey data of the Secretary (as of the date on which the hospital applies for reclassification) and such amount from each of the two immediately preceding surveys; and
an average of the average hourly wage amount for hospitals in such area from the most recently published hospital wage survey data of the Secretary (as of the date on which the hospital applies for reclassification) and such amount from each of the two immediately preceding surveys.
The Board shall have full power and authority to make rules and establish procedures, not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter or regulations of the Secretary, which are necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this paragraph. In the course of any hearing the Board may administer oaths and affirmations. The provisions of subsections (d) and (e) of section 405 of this title with respect to subpenas shall apply to the Board to the same extent as such provisions apply to the Secretary with respect to subchapter II.
The Board is authorized to engage such technical assistance and to receive such information as may be required to carry out its functions, and the Secretary shall, in addition, make available to the Board such secretarial, clerical, and other assistance as the Board may require to carry out its functions.
Each member of the Board who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for grade GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5 for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Board. Each member of the Board who is an officer or employee of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for service as an officer or employee of the United States.
Members of the Board shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Board.
Additional payments for managed care enrollees.—
In general.—
For portions of cost reporting periods occurring on or after
Applicable discharge.—
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “applicable discharge” means the discharge of any individual who is enrolled under a risk-sharing contract with an eligible organization under section 1395mm of this title and who is entitled to benefits under part A or any individual who is enrolled with a Medicare+ÐChoice organization under part C.
Determination of amount.—
The amount of the payment under this paragraph with respect to any applicable discharge shall be equal to the applicable percentage (as defined in subsection (h)(3)(D)(ii)) of the estimated average per discharge amount that would otherwise have been paid under paragraph (5)(B) if the individuals had not been enrolled as described in subparagraph (B).
Special rule for hospitals under reimbursement system.—
The Secretary shall establish rules for the application of this paragraph to a hospital reimbursed under a reimbursement system authorized under section 1395f(b)(3) of this title in the same manner as it would apply to the hospital if it were not reimbursed under such section.
Payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals.—
In general.—
In addition to any payments calculated under this section for a subsection (d) hospital, for discharges occurring during a fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2005), the Secretary shall provide for an additional payment amount to each low-volume hospital (as defined in subparagraph (C)(i)) for discharges occurring during that fiscal year that is equal to the applicable percentage increase (determined under subparagraph (B) or (D) for the hospital involved) in the amount paid to such hospital under this section for such discharges (determined without regard to this paragraph).
Applicable percentage increase.—
For discharges occurring in fiscal years 2005 through 2010 and for discharges occurring during the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
The Secretary shall determine the empirical relationship for subsection (d) hospitals between the standardized cost-per-case for such hospitals and the total number of discharges of such hospitals and the amount of the additional incremental costs (if any) that are associated with such number of discharges.
The applicable percentage increase shall be determined based upon such relationship in a manner that reflects, based upon the number of such discharges for a subsection (d) hospital, such additional incremental costs.
In no case shall the applicable percentage increase exceed 25 percent.
Definitions.—
Low-volume hospital.—
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “low-volume hospital” means, for a fiscal year or portion of a fiscal year, a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in paragraph (1)(B)) that the Secretary determines is located more than 25 road miles (or, with respect to fiscal years 2011 through 2026 and the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
with respect to each of fiscal years 2005 through 2010, less than 800 discharges during the fiscal year;
with respect to each of fiscal years 2011 through 2018, less than 1,600 discharges of individuals entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under part A during the fiscal year or portion of fiscal year;
with respect to each of fiscal years 2019 through 2026 and the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
with respect to the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
Discharge.—
For purposes of subparagraphs (B) and (D) and clause (i), the term “discharge” means an inpatient acute care discharge of an individual regardless (except as provided in clause (i)(II) and subparagraph (D)(i)) of whether the individual is entitled to benefits under part A.
Treatment of indian health service and non-indian health service facilities.—
For purposes of determining whether—
a subsection (d) hospital of the Indian Health Service (whether operated by such Service or by an Indian tribe or tribal organization (as those terms are defined in section 1603 of title 25)), or
a subsection (d) hospital other than a hospital of the Indian Health Service meets the mileage criterion under clause (i) with respect to fiscal year 2011 or a succeeding fiscal year, the Secretary shall apply the policy described in the regulation at part 8
Temporary applicable percentage increase.—
For discharges occurring in fiscal years 2011 through 2026 or during the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
with respect to each of fiscal years 2011 through 2018, with 200 or fewer discharges of individuals entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under part A in the fiscal year or the portion of fiscal year to 0 percent for low-volume hospitals with greater than 1,600 discharges of such individuals in the fiscal year or the portion of fiscal year or portion of fiscal year; 9
with respect to each of fiscal years 2019 through 2026 and the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
In order to recognize commuting patterns among geographic areas, the Secretary shall establish a process through application or otherwise for an increase of the wage index applied under paragraph (3)(E) for subsection (d) hospitals located in a qualifying county described in subparagraph (B) in the amount computed under subparagraph (D) based on out-migration of hospital employees who reside in that county to any higher wage index area.
The Secretary shall establish criteria for a qualifying county under this subparagraph based on the out-migration referred to in subparagraph (A) and differences in the area wage indices. Under such criteria the Secretary shall, utilizing such data as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, establish—
a threshold percentage, established by the Secretary, of the weighted average of the area wage index or indices for the higher wage index areas involved;
a threshold (of not less than 10 percent) for minimum out-migration to a higher wage index area or areas; and
a requirement that the average hourly wage of the hospitals in the qualifying county equals or exceeds the average hourly wage of all the hospitals in the area in which the qualifying county is located.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “higher wage index area” means, with respect to a county, an area with a wage index that exceeds that of the county.
The increase in the wage index under subparagraph (A) for a qualifying county shall be equal to the percentage of the hospital employees residing in the qualifying county who are employed in any higher wage index area multiplied by the sum of the products, for each higher wage index area of—
the difference between—
the wage index for such higher wage index area, and
the wage index of the qualifying county; and
the number of hospital employees residing in the qualifying county who are employed in such higher wage index area divided by the total number of hospital employees residing in the qualifying county who are employed in any higher wage index area.
The process under this paragraph may be based upon the process used by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board under paragraph (10). As the Secretary determines to be appropriate to carry out such process, the Secretary may require hospitals (including subsection (d) hospitals and other hospitals) and critical access hospitals, as required under section 1395cc(a)(1)(T) of this title, to submit data regarding the location of residence, or the Secretary may use data from other sources.
A wage index increase under this paragraph shall be effective for a period of 3 fiscal years, except that the Secretary shall establish procedures under which a subsection (d) hospital may elect to waive the application of such wage index increase.
A hospital in a county that has a wage index increase under this paragraph for a period and that has not waived the application of such an increase under subparagraph (F) is not eligible for reclassification under paragraph (8) or (10) during that period.
Any increase in a wage index under this paragraph for a county shall not be taken into account for purposes of—
computing the wage index for portions of the wage index area (not including the county) in which the county is located; or
applying any budget neutrality adjustment with respect to such index under paragraph (8)(D).
The thresholds described in subparagraph (B), data on hospital employees used under this paragraph, and any determination of the Secretary under the process described in subparagraph (E) shall be final and shall not be subject to judicial review.
Proportional adjustments in applicable percentage increases
For cost reporting periods of hospitals beginning in fiscal year 1984 or fiscal year 1985, the Secretary shall provide for such proportional adjustment in the applicable percentage increase (otherwise applicable to the periods under subsection (b)(3)(B)) as may be necessary to assure that—
the aggregate payment amounts otherwise provided under subsection (d)(1)(A)(i)(I) for that fiscal year for operating costs of inpatient hospital services of hospitals (excluding payments made under section 1395cc(a)(1)(F) of this title),
are not greater or less than—
the target percentage (as defined in subsection (d)(1)(C)) of the payment amounts which would have been payable for such services for those same hospitals for that fiscal year under this section under the law as in effect before
except that the adjustment made under this subparagraph shall apply only to subsection (d) hospitals and shall not apply for purposes of making computations under subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii) or subsection (d)(3)(A).
For discharges occurring in fiscal year 1984 or fiscal year 1985, the Secretary shall provide under subsections (d)(2)(F) and (d)(3)(C) for such equal proportional adjustment in each of the average standardized amounts otherwise computed for that fiscal year as may be necessary to assure that—
the aggregate payment amounts otherwise provided under subsection (d)(1)(A)(i)(II) and (d)(5) for that fiscal year for operating costs of inpatient hospital services of hospitals (excluding payments made under section 1395cc(a)(1)(F) of this title),
are not greater or less than—
the DRG percentage (as defined in subsection (d)(1)(C)) of the payment amounts which would have been payable for such services for those same hospitals for that fiscal year under this section under the law as in effect before
For discharges occurring in fiscal year 1988, the Secretary shall provide for such equal proportional adjustment in each of the average standardized amounts otherwise computed under subsection (d)(3) for that fiscal year as may be necessary to assure that—
the aggregate payment amounts otherwise provided under subsections (d)(1)(A)(iii), (d)(5), and (d)(9) for that fiscal year for operating costs of inpatient hospital services of subsection (d) hospitals and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals,
are not greater or less than—
the payment amounts that would have been payable for such services for those same hospitals for that fiscal year but for the enactment of the amendments made by section 9304 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986.
Taking into consideration the recommendations of the Commission, the Secretary shall recommend for each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1988) an appropriate change factor for inpatient hospital services for discharges in that fiscal year which will take into account amounts necessary for the efficient and effective delivery of medically appropriate and necessary care of high quality. The appropriate change factor may be different for all large urban subsection (d) hospitals, other urban subsection (d) hospitals, urban subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals, rural subsection (d) hospitals, and rural subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals, and all other hospitals and units not paid under subsection (d), and may vary among such other hospitals and units.
In addition to the recommendation made under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Commission under paragraph (2)(B), recommend for each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1992) other appropriate changes in each existing reimbursement policy under this subchapter under which payments to an institution are based upon prospectively determined rates.
The Secretary shall cause to have published in the Federal Register, not later than—
the April 1 before each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1986), the Secretary’s proposed recommendations under paragraph (4) for that fiscal year for public comment, and
the August 1 before such fiscal year after such consideration of public comment on the proposal as is feasible in the time available, the Secretary’s final recommendations under such paragraph for that year.
The Secretary shall include in the publication referred to in subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year the report of the Commission’s recommendations submitted under paragraph (3) for that fiscal year. To the extent that the Secretary’s recommendations under paragraph (4) differ from the Commission’s recommendations for that fiscal year, the Secretary shall include in the publication referred to in subparagraph (A) an explanation of the Secretary’s grounds for not following the Commission’s recommendations.
Reporting of costs of hospitals receiving payments on basis of prospective rates
The Secretary shall maintain a system for the reporting of costs of hospitals receiving payments computed under subsection (d).
Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary shall place into effect a standardized electronic cost reporting format for hospitals under this subchapter.
The Secretary may delay or waive the implementation of such format in particular instances where such implementation would result in financial hardship (in particular with respect to hospitals with a small percentage of inpatients entitled to benefits under this subchapter).
If the Secretary determines, based upon information supplied by a quality improvement organization under part B of subchapter XI, that a hospital, in order to circumvent the payment method established under subsection (b) or (d) of this section, has taken an action that results in the admission of individuals entitled to benefits under part A unnecessarily, unnecessary multiple admissions of the same such individuals, or other inappropriate medical or other practices with respect to such individuals, the Secretary may—
deny payment (in whole or in part) under part A with respect to inpatient hospital services provided with respect to such an unnecessary admission (or subsequent admission of the same individual), or
require the hospital to take other corrective action necessary to prevent or correct the inappropriate practice.
The provisions of subsections (c) through (g) of section 1320a–7 of this title shall apply to determinations made under paragraph (2) in the same manner as they apply to exclusions effected under section 1320a–7(b)(13) of this title.
Prospective payment for capital-related costs; return on equity capital for hospitals
Notwithstanding section 1395x(v) of this title, instead of any amounts that are otherwise payable under this subchapter with respect to the reasonable costs of subsection (d) hospitals and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals for capital-related costs of inpatient hospital services, the Secretary shall, for hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Such system—
shall provide for (I) a payment on a per discharge basis, and (II) an appropriate weighting of such payment amount as relates to the classification of the discharge;
may provide for an adjustment to take into account variations in the relative costs of capital and construction for the different types of facilities or areas in which they are located;
may provide for such exceptions (including appropriate exceptions to reflect capital obligations) as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, and
may provide for suitable adjustment to reflect hospital occupancy rate.
In this paragraph, the term “capital-related costs” has the meaning given such term by the Secretary under subsection (a)(4) as of
The Secretary shall provide that the amount which is allowable, with respect to reasonable costs of inpatient hospital services for which payment may be made under this subchapter, for a return on equity capital for hospitals shall, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
In this paragraph, the “applicable percentage” is—
75 percent, for cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 1987,
50 percent, for cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 1988,
25 percent, for cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 1989, and
0 percent, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), in determining the amount of the payments that may be made under this subchapter with respect to all the capital-related costs of inpatient hospital services of a subsection (d) hospital and a subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospital, the Secretary shall reduce the amounts of such payments otherwise established under this subchapter by—
3.5 percent for payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods occurring during fiscal year 1987,
7 percent for payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods or discharges (as the case may be) occurring during fiscal year 1988 on or after
12 percent for payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods or discharges (as the case may be) in fiscal year 1988, occurring on or after
15 percent for payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods or discharges (as the case may be) occurring during fiscal year 1989, and
15 percent for payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods or discharges (as the case may be) occurring during the period beginning
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to payments with respect to the capital-related costs of any hospital that is a sole community hospital (as defined in subsection (d)(5)(D)(iii)) or a critical access hospital (as defined in section 1395x(mm)(1) of this title).
In determining the amount of the payments that are attributable to portions of cost reporting periods occurring during fiscal years 1998 through 2002 and that may be made under this subchapter with respect to capital-related costs of inpatient hospital services of a hospital which is described in clause (i), (ii), or (iv) of subsection (d)(1)(B) or a unit described in the matter after clause (v) of such subsection, the Secretary shall reduce the amounts of such payments otherwise determined under this subchapter by 15 percent.
Payments for direct graduate medical education costs
Substitution of special payment rules
Determination of hospital-specific approved FTE resident amounts
The Secretary shall determine, for each hospital with an approved medical residency training program, an approved FTE resident amount for each cost reporting period beginning on or after
Determining allowable average cost per FTE resident in a hospital’s base period
Updating to the first cost reporting period
In general
Exception
Amount for first cost reporting period
Amount for subsequent cost reporting periods
In general
Freeze in update for fiscal years 1994 and 1995
Floor for locality adjusted national average per resident amount
Adjustment in rate of increase for hospitals with FTE approved amount above 140 percent of locality adjusted national average per resident amount
Freeze for fiscal years 2001 and 2002 and 2004 through 2013
2 percent decrease in update for fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005
No adjustment below 140 percent
Determination of locality adjusted national average per resident amount
The Secretary shall determine a locality adjusted national average per resident amount with respect to a cost reporting period of a hospital beginning during a fiscal year as follows:
Determining hospital single per resident amount
Standardizing per resident amounts
Computing of weighted average
Computing national average per resident amount
Adjusting for locality
The Secretary shall compute the product of—
the national average per resident amount computed under clause (iv) for the hospital, and
the geographic index value average (described and applied under clause (ii)) for the fee schedule area in which the hospital is located.
Computing locality adjusted amount
The locality adjusted national per resident amount for a hospital for—
the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2001 is the product computed under clause (v); or
each subsequent cost reporting period is equal to the locality adjusted national per resident amount for the hospital for the previous cost reporting period (as determined under this clause) updated, through the midpoint of the period, by projecting the estimated percentage change in the consumer price index for all urban consumers during the 12-month period ending at that midpoint.
Treatment of certain hospitals
In the case of a hospital that did not have an approved medical residency training program or was not participating in the program under this subchapter for a cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1984, the Secretary shall, for the first such period for which it has such a residency training program and is participating under this subchapter, provide for such approved FTE resident amount as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, based on approved FTE resident amounts for comparable programs.
In applying this subparagraph in the case of a hospital that trains residents and has not entered into a GME affiliation agreement (as defined by the Secretary for purposes of paragraph (4)(H)(ii)), on or after
In applying this subparagraph for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
less than 1.0 full-time-equivalent resident in any cost reporting period beginning before
no more than 3.0 full-time-equivalent residents in any cost reporting period beginning on or after
in lieu of such FTE resident amount the Secretary shall, in accordance with the methodology described in section 413.77(e) of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), establish a new FTE resident amount if the hospital trains at least 1.0 full-time-equivalent resident (in the case of a hospital described in subclause (I)) or more than 3.0 full-time-equivalent residents (in the case of a hospital described in subclause (II)) in a cost reporting period beginning on or after such date and before the date that is 5 years after such date.
For purposes of carrying out this subparagraph for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
As appropriate, the Secretary may consider information from any cost reporting period necessary to establish a new FTE resident amount as described in clause (iii).
Hospital payment amount per resident
In general
The payment amount, for a hospital cost reporting period beginning on or after
the aggregate approved amount (as defined in subparagraph (B)) for that period, and
the hospital’s medicare patient load (as defined in subparagraph (C)) for that period.
Aggregate approved amount
As used in subparagraph (A), the term “aggregate approved amount” means, for a hospital cost reporting period, the product of—
the hospital’s approved FTE resident amount (determined under paragraph (2)) for that period, and
the weighted average number of full-time-equivalent residents (as determined under paragraph (4)) in the hospital’s approved medical residency training programs in that period.
The Secretary shall reduce the aggregate approved amount to the extent payment is made under subsection (k) for residents included in the hospital’s count of full-time equivalent residents.
Medicare patient load
Payment for managed care enrollees
In general
For portions of cost reporting periods occurring on or after
the aggregate approved amount (as defined in subparagraph (B)) for that period; and
the fraction of the total number of inpatient-bed days (as established by the Secretary) during the period which are attributable to such enrolled individuals.
Applicable percentage
For purposes of clause (i), the applicable percentage is—
20 percent in 1998,
40 percent in 1999,
60 percent in 2000,
80 percent in 2001, and
100 percent in 2002 and subsequent years.
Proportional reduction for nursing and allied health education
Special rule for hospitals under reimbursement system
Determination of full-time-equivalent residents
Rules
Adjustment for part-year or part-time residents
Weighting factors for certain residents
Subject to subparagraph (D), such rules shall provide, in calculating the number of full-time-equivalent residents in an approved residency program—
before
on or after
on or after
on or after
Foreign medical graduates required to pass FMGEMS examination
In general
Except as provided in clause (ii), such rules shall provide that, in the case of an individual who is a foreign medical graduate (as defined in paragraph (5)(D)), the individual shall not be counted as a resident on or after
the individual has passed the FMGEMS examination (as defined in paragraph (5)(E)), or
the individual has previously received certification from, or has previously passed the examination of, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.
Transition for current FMGS
On or after
has served as a resident before
has not passed the FMGEMS examination or a previous examination of the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates before
the individual shall be counted as a resident at a rate equal to one-half of the rate at which the individual would otherwise be counted.
Counting time spent in outpatient settings
Subject to subparagraphs (J) and (K), such rules shall provide that only time spent in activities relating to patient care shall be counted and that—
effective for cost reporting periods beginning before
effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Any hospital claiming under this subparagraph for time spent in a nonprovider setting shall maintain and make available to the Secretary records regarding the amount of such time and such amount in comparison with amounts of such time in such base year as the Secretary shall specify.
Limitation on number of residents in allopathic and osteopathic medicine
In general
Counting primary care residents on certain approved leaves of absence in base year FTE count
In general
Limitation to 3 FTE residents for any hospital
Counting interns and residents for FY 1998 and subsequent years
In general
Adjustment for short periods
Transition rule for 1998
Special rules for application of subparagraphs (F) and (G)
New facilities
The Secretary shall, consistent with the principles of subparagraphs (F) and (G) and subject to paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10), prescribe rules for the application of such subparagraphs in the case of medical residency training programs established on or after
In applying this clause in the case of a hospital that, on or after
In applying this clause in the case of a hospital that, as of
In applying this clause in the case of a hospital that, as of
An adjustment to the limitation applicable to a hospital made pursuant to subclause (III) or (IV) shall be made in a manner consistent with the methodology, as appropriate, in section 413.79(e) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation). As appropriate, the Secretary may consider information from any cost reporting periods necessary to make such an adjustment to the limitation.
Aggregation
Data collection
Training programs in rural areas
Cost reporting periods beginning before October 1, 2022
Cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2022
Special provider agreement
If an entity enters into a provider agreement pursuant to section 1395cc(a) of this title to provide hospital services on the same physical site previously used by Medicare Provider No. 05–0578—
the limitation on the number of total full time equivalent residents under subparagraph (F) and clauses (v) and (vi)(I) of subsection (d)(5)(B) applicable to such provider shall be equal to the limitation applicable under such provisions to Provider No. 05–0578 for its cost reporting period ending on
the provisions of subparagraph (G) and subsection (d)(5)(B)(vi)(II) shall not be applicable to such provider for the first three cost reporting years in which such provider trains residents under any approved medical residency training program.
Redistribution of residency slots after a hospital closes
In general
Priority for hospitals in certain areas
Subject to the succeeding provisions of this clause, in determining for which hospitals the increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit is provided under such process, the Secretary shall distribute the increase to hospitals in the following priority order (with preference given within each category to hospitals that are members of the same affiliated group (as defined by the Secretary under clause (ii)) as the closed hospital):
First, to hospitals located in the same core-based statistical area as, or a core-based statistical area contiguous to, the hospital that closed.
Second, to hospitals located in the same State as the hospital that closed.
Third, to hospitals located in the same region of the country as the hospital that closed.
Fourth, only if the Secretary is not able to distribute the increase to hospitals described in item (cc), to qualifying hospitals in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (8).
Requirement hospital likely to fill position within certain time period
Limitation
Administration
1212 So in original. No subpar. (I) has been enacted. Treatment of certain nonprovider and didactic activities
Treatment of certain other activities
Definitions and special rules
As used in this subsection:
Approved medical residency training program
Consumer price index
Direct graduate medical education costs
Foreign medical graduate
The term “foreign medical graduate” means a resident who is not a graduate of—
a school of medicine accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education of the American Medical Association and the Association of American Medical Colleges (or approved by such Committee as meeting the standards necessary for such accreditation),
a school of osteopathy accredited by the American Osteopathic Association, or approved by such Association as meeting the standards necessary for such accreditation, or
a school of dentistry or podiatry which is accredited (or meets the standards for accreditation) by an organization recognized by the Secretary for such purpose.
FMGEMS examination
Initial residency period
The term “initial residency period” means the period of board eligibility, except that—
except as provided in clause (ii), in no case shall the initial period of residency exceed an aggregate period of formal training of more than five years for any individual, and
a period, of not more than two years, during which an individual is in a geriatric residency or fellowship program or a preventive medicine residency or fellowship program which meets such criteria as the Secretary may establish, shall be treated as part of the initial residency period, but shall not be counted against any limitation on the initial residency period.
Subject to subparagraph (G)(v), the initial residency period shall be determined, with respect to a resident, as of the time the resident enters the residency training program.
Period of board eligibility
General rule
Application of 1985–1986 directory
Changes in period of board eligibility
On or after
increases the minimum number of years of formal training necessary to satisfy the requirements for a specialty, above the period specified in its 1985–1986 Directory, the Secretary may increase the period of board eligibility for that specialty, but not to exceed the period of board eligibility specified in that later Directory, or
decreases the minimum number of years of formal training necessary to satisfy the requirements for a specialty, below the period specified in its 1985–1986 Directory, the Secretary may decrease the period of board eligibility for that specialty, but not below the period of board eligibility specified in that later Directory.
Special rule for certain primary care combined residency programs
In the case of a resident enrolled in a combined medical residency training program in which all of the individual programs (that are combined) are for training a primary care resident (as defined in subparagraph (H)), the period of board eligibility shall be the minimum number of years of formal training required to satisfy the requirements for initial board eligibility in the longest of the individual programs plus one additional year.
A resident enrolled in a combined medical residency training program that includes an obstetrics and gynecology program shall qualify for the period of board eligibility under subclause (I) if the other programs such resident combines with such obstetrics and gynecology program are for training a primary care resident.
Child neurology training programs
Primary care resident
Resident
Adjustments for certain family practice residency programs
In general
In the case of an approved medical residency training program (meeting the requirements of clause (ii)) of a hospital which received funds from the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State or an instrumentality of such a State or political subdivision (other than payments under this subchapter or a State plan under subchapter XIX) for the program during the cost reporting period that began during fiscal year 1984, the Secretary shall—
provide for an average amount under paragraph (2)(A) that takes into account the Secretary’s estimate of the amount that would have been recognized as reasonable under this subchapter if the hospital had not received such funds, and
reduce the payment amount otherwise provided under this subsection in an amount equal to the proportion of such program funds received during the cost reporting period involved that is allocable to this subchapter.
Additional requirements
A hospital’s approved medical residency program meets the requirements of this clause if—
the program is limited to training for family and community medicine;
the program is the only approved medical residency program of the hospital; and
the average amount determined under paragraph (2)(A) for the hospital (as determined without regard to the increase in such amount described in clause (i)(I)) does not exceed $10,000.
Nonprovider setting that is primarily engaged in furnishing patient care
Incentive payment under plans for voluntary reduction in number of residents
In general
In the case of a voluntary residency reduction plan for which an application is approved under subparagraph (B), subject to subparagraph (F), each hospital which is part of the qualifying entity submitting the plan shall be paid an applicable hold harmless percentage (as specified in subparagraph (E)) of the sum of—
the amount (if any) by which—
the amount of payment which would have been made under this subsection if there had been a 5-percent reduction in the number of full-time equivalent residents in the approved medical education training programs of the hospital as of
the amount of payment which is made under this subsection, taking into account the reduction in such number effected under the reduction plan; and
the amount of the reduction in payment under subsection (d)(5)(B) for the hospital that is attributable to the reduction in number of residents effected under the plan below 95 percent of the number of full-time equivalent residents in such programs of the hospital as of
The determination of the amounts under clauses (i) and (ii) for any year shall be made on the basis of the provisions of this subchapter in effect on the application deadline date for the first calendar year to which the reduction plan applies.
Approval of plan applications
The Secretary may not approve the application of an qualifying entity unless—
the application is submitted in a form and manner specified by the Secretary and by not later than
the application provides for the operation of a plan for the reduction in the number of full-time equivalent residents in the approved medical residency training programs of the entity consistent with the requirements of subparagraph (D);
the entity elects in the application the period of residency training years (not greater than 5) over which the reduction will occur;
the entity will not reduce the proportion of its residents in primary care (to the total number of residents) below such proportion as in effect as of the applicable time described in subparagraph (D)(v); and
the Secretary determines that the application and the entity and such plan meet such other requirements as the Secretary specifies in regulations.
Qualifying entity
For purposes of this paragraph, any of the following may be a qualifying entity:
Individual hospitals operating one or more approved medical residency training programs.
Two or more hospitals that operate such programs and apply for treatment under this paragraph as a single qualifying entity.
A qualifying consortium (as described in section 4628 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997).
Residency reduction requirements
Individual hospital applicants
In the case of a qualifying entity described in subparagraph (C)(i), the number of full-time equivalent residents in all the approved medical residency training programs operated by or through the entity shall be reduced as follows:
If the base number of residents exceeds 750 residents, by a number equal to at least 20 percent of such base number.
Subject to subclause (IV), if the base number of residents exceeds 600 but is less than 750 residents, by 150 residents.
Subject to subclause (IV), if the base number of residents does not exceed 600 residents, by a number equal to at least 25 percent of such base number.
In the case of a qualifying entity which is described in clause (v) and which elects treatment under this subclause, by a number equal to at least 20 percent of the base number.
Joint applicants
In the case of a qualifying entity described in subparagraph (C)(ii), the number of full-time equivalent residents in the aggregate for all the approved medical residency training programs operated by or through the entity shall be reduced as follows:
Subject to subclause (II), by a number equal to at least 25 percent of the base number.
In the case of such a qualifying entity which is described in clause (v) and which elects treatment under this subclause, by a number equal to at least 20 percent of the base number.
Consortia
Manner of reduction
Entities providing assurance of increase in primary care residents
An entity is described in this clause if—
the base number of residents for the entity is less than 750 or the entity is described in subparagraph (C)(ii); and
the entity represents in its application under subparagraph (B) that it will increase the number of full-time equivalent residents in primary care by at least 20 percent (from such number included in the base number of residents) by not later than the 5th residency training year in which the application under subparagraph (B) is effective.
If a qualifying entity fails to comply with the representation described in subclause (II) by the end of such 5th residency training year, the entity shall be subject to repayment of all amounts paid under this paragraph, in accordance with procedures established to carry out subparagraph (F).
“Base number of residents” defined
Applicable hold harmless percentage
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the “applicable hold harmless percentage” for the—
first and second residency training years in which the reduction plan is in effect, 100 percent,
third such year, 75 percent,
fourth such year, 50 percent, and
fifth such year, 25 percent.
Penalty for noncompliance
In general
Increase in number of residents in subsequent years
Treatment of rotating residents
Redistribution of unused resident positions
Reduction in limit based on unused positions
Programs subject to reduction
In general
Exception for small rural hospitals
Reference resident level
In general
Use of most recent accounting period to recognize expansion of existing programs
Expansions under newly approved programs
Affiliation
Redistribution
In general
Considerations in redistribution
Priority for rural and small urban areas
In determining for which hospitals and residency training programs an increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit is provided under clause (i), the Secretary shall distribute the increase to programs of hospitals located in the following priority order:
First, to hospitals located in rural areas (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)(ii)).
Second, to hospitals located in urban areas that are not large urban areas (as defined for purposes of subsection (d)).
Third, to other hospitals in a State if the residency training program involved is in a specialty for which there are not other residency training programs in the State.
Increases of residency limits within the same priority category under this clause shall be determined by the Secretary.
Limitation
Application of locality adjusted national average per resident amount
Construction
Resident level and limit defined
In this paragraph:
Resident level
Otherwise applicable resident limit
Adjustment based on settled cost report
In the case of a hospital with a dual accredited osteopathic and allopathic family practice program for which—
the otherwise applicable resident limit was reduced under subparagraph (A)(i)(I); and
such reduction was based on a reference resident level that was determined using a cost report and where a revised or corrected notice of program reimbursement was issued for such cost report between
the Secretary shall apply subparagraph (A)(i)(I) using the higher resident reference level and make any necessary adjustments to such reduction. Any such necessary adjustments shall be effective for portions of cost reporting periods occurring on or after
Judicial review
Distribution of additional residency positions
Reductions in limit based on unused positions
In general
Exceptions
This subparagraph shall not apply to—
a hospital located in a rural area (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)(ii)) with fewer than 250 acute care inpatient beds;
a hospital that was part of a qualifying entity which had a voluntary residency reduction plan approved under paragraph (6)(B) or under the authority of section 402 of Public Law 90–248, if the hospital demonstrates to the Secretary that it has a specified plan in place for filling the unused positions by not later than 2 years after
a hospital described in paragraph (4)(H)(v).
Distribution
In general
Requirements
Subject to clause (iii), a hospital that receives an increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit under this subparagraph shall ensure, during the 5-year period beginning on the date of such increase, that—
the number of full-time equivalent primary care residents, as defined in paragraph (5)(H) (as determined by the Secretary), excluding any additional positions under subclause (II), is not less than the average number of full-time equivalent primary care residents (as so determined) during the 3 most recent cost reporting periods ending prior to
not less than 75 percent of the positions attributable to such increase are in a primary care or general surgery residency (as determined by the Secretary).
The Secretary may determine whether a hospital has met the requirements under this clause during such 5-year period in such manner and at such time as the Secretary determines appropriate, including at the end of such 5-year period.
Redistribution of positions if hospital no longer meets certain requirements
In the case where the Secretary determines that a hospital described in clause (ii) does not meet either of the requirements under subclause (I) or (II) of such clause, the Secretary shall—
reduce the otherwise applicable resident limit of the hospital by the amount by which such limit was increased under this paragraph; and
provide for the distribution of positions attributable to such reduction in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph.
Considerations in redistribution
In determining for which hospitals the increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit is provided under subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall take into account—
the demonstration likelihood of the hospital filling the positions made available under this paragraph within the first 3 cost reporting periods beginning on or after
whether the hospital has an accredited rural training track (as described in paragraph (4)(H)(iv)).
Priority for certain areas
In determining for which hospitals the increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit is provided under subparagraph (B), subject to subparagraph (E), the Secretary shall distribute the increase to hospitals based on the following factors:
Whether the hospital is located in a State with a resident-to-population ratio in the lowest quartile (as determined by the Secretary).
Whether the hospital is located in a State, a territory of the United States, or the District of Columbia that is among the top 10 States, territories, or Districts in terms of the ratio of—
the total population of the State, territory, or District living in an area designated (under such section 332(a)(1)(A) 4) as a health professional shortage area (as of
the total population of the State, territory, or District (as determined by the Secretary based on the most recent available population data published by the Bureau of the Census).
Whether the hospital is located in a rural area (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)(ii)).
Reservation of positions for certain hospitals
In general
Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary shall reserve the positions available for distribution under this paragraph as follows:
70 percent of such positions for distribution to hospitals described in clause (i) of subparagraph (D).
30 percent of such positions for distribution to hospitals described in clause (ii) and (iii) of such subparagraph.
Exception if positions not redistributed by July 1, 2011
Limitation
Application of per resident amounts for primary care and nonprimary care
Definitions
In this paragraph:
Reference resident level
Resident level
Otherwise applicable resident limit
Affiliation
Distribution of additional residency positions
Additional residency positions
In general
Number available for distribution
Total number available
Annual limit
Process for distributing positions
Rounds of applications
Timing
Distribution
For purposes of providing an increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit under subparagraph (A), the following shall apply:
Considerations in distribution
Minimum distribution for certain categories of hospitals
With respect to the aggregate number of such positions available for distribution under this paragraph, the Secretary shall distribute not less than 10 percent of such aggregate number to each of the following categories of hospitals:
Hospitals that are located in a rural area (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)) or are treated as being located in a rural area pursuant to subsection (d)(8)(E).
Hospitals in which the reference resident level of the hospital (as specified in subparagraph (F)(iii)) is greater than the otherwise applicable resident limit.
Hospitals in States with—
new medical schools that received “Candidate School” status from the Liaison Committee on Medical Education or that received “Pre-Accreditation” status from the American Osteopathic Association Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation on or after
additional locations and branch campuses established on or after
Hospitals that serve areas designated as health professional shortage areas under section 254e(a)(1)(A) of this title, as determined by the Secretary.
Limitations
In general
Prohibition on distribution to hospitals without an increase agreement
Application of per resident amounts for primary care and nonprimary care
Permitting facilities to apply aggregation rules
Definitions
In this paragraph:
Otherwise applicable resident limit
Qualifying hospital
Reference resident level
Resident level
Distribution of additional residency positions in psychiatry and psychiatry subspecialties
Additional residency positions
In general
Number available for distribution
Distribution for psychiatry or psychiatry subspecialty residencies
Timing
Distribution
For purposes of providing an increase in the otherwise applicable resident limit under subparagraph (A), the following shall apply:
Considerations in distribution
Minimum distribution for certain categories of hospitals
With respect to the aggregate number of such positions available for distribution under this paragraph, the Secretary shall distribute not less than 10 percent of such aggregate number to each of the following categories of hospitals:
Hospitals that are located in a rural area (as defined in section 1395ww(d)(2)(D) of this title) or are treated as being located in a rural area pursuant to section 1395ww(d)(8)(E) of this title.
Hospitals in which the reference resident level of the hospital (as specified in subparagraph (F)(iii)) is greater than the otherwise applicable resident limit.
Hospitals in States with—
new medical schools that received “Candidate School” status from the Liaison Committee on Medical Education or that received “Pre-Accreditation” status from the American Osteopathic Association Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation on or after
additional locations and branch campuses established on or after
Hospitals that serve areas designated as health professional shortage areas under section 254e(a)(1)(A) of this title, as determined by the Secretary.
Pro rata application
Requirements
Limitation
Prohibition on distribution to hospitals without an increase agreement
Requirement for hospitals to expand programs
Application of per resident amounts for nonprimary care
Permitting facilities to apply aggregation rules
Definitions
In this paragraph:
Otherwise applicable resident limit
Psychiatry or psychiatry subspecialty residency
Qualifying hospital
Reference resident level
Resident level
Avoiding duplicative payments to hospitals participating in rural demonstration programs
Prospective payment for inpatient rehabilitation services
Payment during transition period
In general
Notwithstanding section 1395f(b) of this title, but subject to the provisions of section 1395e of this title, the amount of the payment with respect to the operating and capital costs of inpatient hospital services of a rehabilitation hospital or a rehabilitation unit (in this subsection referred to as a “rehabilitation facility”), other than a facility making an election under subparagraph (F) in a cost reporting period beginning on or after
the TEFRA percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the amount that would have been paid under part A with respect to such costs if this subsection did not apply, and
the prospective payment percentage (as defined in subparagraph (C)) of the product of (I) the per unit payment rate established under this subsection for the fiscal year in which the payment unit of service occurs, and (II) the number of such payment units occurring in the cost reporting period.
Fully implemented system
TEFRA and prospective payment percentages specified
For purposes of subparagraph (A), for a cost reporting period beginning—
on or after
on or after
Payment unit
Construction relating to transfer authority
Election to apply full prospective payment system
Patient case mix groups
Establishment
The Secretary shall establish—
classes of patient discharges of rehabilitation facilities by functional-related groups (each in this subsection referred to as a “case mix group”), based on impairment, age, comorbidities, and functional capability of the patient and such other factors as the Secretary deems appropriate to improve the explanatory power of functional independence measure-function related groups; and
a method of classifying specific patients in rehabilitation facilities within these groups.
Weighting factors
Adjustments for case mix
In general
Adjustment
Data collection
Payment rate
In general
The Secretary shall determine a prospective payment rate for each payment unit for which such rehabilitation facility is entitled to receive payment under this subchapter. Subject to subparagraph (B), such rate for payment units occurring during a fiscal year shall be based on the average payment per payment unit under this subchapter for inpatient operating and capital costs of rehabilitation facilities using the most recent data available (as estimated by the Secretary as of the date of establishment of the system) adjusted—
by updating such per-payment-unit amount to the fiscal year involved by the weighted average of the applicable percentage increases provided under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii) (for cost reporting periods beginning during the fiscal year) covering the period from the midpoint of the period for such data through the midpoint of fiscal year 2000 and by an increase factor (described in subparagraph (C)) specified by the Secretary for subsequent fiscal years up to the fiscal year involved;
by reducing such rates by a factor equal to the proportion of payments under this subsection (as estimated by the Secretary) based on prospective payment amounts which are additional payments described in paragraph (4) (relating to outlier and related payments);
for variations among rehabilitation facilities by area under paragraph (6);
by the weighting factors established under paragraph (2)(B); and
by such other factors as the Secretary determines are necessary to properly reflect variations in necessary costs of treatment among rehabilitation facilities.
Budget neutral rates
Increase factor
In general
Productivity and other adjustment
Subject to clause (iii), after establishing the increase factor described in clause (i) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall reduce such increase factor—
for fiscal year 2012 and each subsequent fiscal year, by the productivity adjustment described in subsection (b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and
for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in subparagraph (D).
The application of this clause may result in the increase factor under this subparagraph being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year.
Special rule for fiscal year 2018
Other adjustment
For purposes of subparagraph (C)(ii)(II), the other adjustment described in this subparagraph is—
for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011, 0.25 percentage point;
for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point;
for fiscal year 2014, 0.3 percentage point;
for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and
for each of fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.
Outlier and special payments
Outliers
In general
Payment based on marginal cost of care
Total payments
Adjustment
Publication
Area wage adjustment
Quality reporting
Reduction in update for failure to report
In general
Special rule
Noncumulative application
Submission of quality data
Quality measures
In general
Exception
Time frame
Public availability of data submitted
In general
Public recognition of rehabilitation innovation centers
Rehabilitation innovation centers defined
Rehabilitation facility described
In general
Subject to subclause (II), a rehabilitation facility described in this clause is a rehabilitation facility that—
is classified as a rehabilitation facility under the IRF Rate Setting File for the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Federal Fiscal Year 2019 (83 Fed. Reg. 38514), or any successor regulations that contain such information;
holds at least one Federal rehabilitation research and training designation for research projects on traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research at the Department of Health and Human Services, based on such data submitted to the Secretary by a facility, in a form, manner, and time frame specified by the Secretary;
submits to the Secretary a description of the clinical research enterprise of the facility and a summary of research activities of the facility that are supported by Federal agencies;
has a minimum Medicare estimated average weight per discharge of 1.20 for the most recent fiscal year for which such information is available according to the IRF Rate Setting File described in item (aa), or any successor regulations that contain such information; and
has a minimum teaching status of 0.075 for the most recent fiscal year for which such information is available according to the IRF Rate Setting File described in item (aa), or any successor regulations that contain such information.
Waiver
Applicable date defined
For purposes of clauses (iii) and (iv), the term “applicable date” means—
with respect to the initial publication of a list under clause (ii),
with respect to the publication of an updated list under clause (ii), a date specified by the Secretary that is not more than one year prior to the date of such publication.
Implementation
Nonapplication of Paperwork Reduction Act
Submission of additional data
In general
Standardized patient assessment data
Submission
Non-duplication
Limitation on review
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, 1395oo of this title, or otherwise of the establishment of—
case mix groups, of the methodology for the classification of patients within such groups, and of the appropriate weighting factors thereof under paragraph (2),
the prospective payment rates under paragraph (3),
outlier and special payments under paragraph (4), and
area wage adjustments under paragraph (6).
Payment to nonhospital providers
In general
Qualified nonhospital providers
For purposes of this subsection, the term “qualified nonhospital providers” means—
a Federally 15
a rural health clinic, as defined in section 1395x(aa)(2) of this title;
Medicare+Choice organizations; and
such other providers (other than hospitals) as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Payment for nursing and allied health education for managed care enrollees
In general
Payment amount
The additional payment amount under this subsection for each hospital for portions of cost reporting periods occurring in a year shall be an amount specified by the Secretary in a manner consistent with the following:
Determination of managed care enrollee payment ratio for graduate medical education payments
Application to fee-for-service nursing and allied health education payments
In general
Exception to annual limitation for each of 2010 through 2019
Application to hospital
The amount of payment under this subsection to a hospital for portions of cost reporting periods occurring in a year is equal to the total amount of payments determined under subparagraph (B) for the year multiplied by the ratio of—
the product of (I) the Secretary’s estimate of the ratio of the amount of payments made under section 1395x(v) of this title to the hospital for nursing and allied health education activities for the hospital’s cost reporting period ending in the second preceding fiscal year, to the hospital’s total inpatient days for such period, and (II) the total number of inpatient days (as established by the Secretary) for such period which are attributable to services furnished to individuals who are enrolled under a risk sharing contract with an eligible organization under section 1395mm of this title and who are entitled to benefits under part A or who are enrolled with a Medicare+Choice organization under part C; to
the sum of the products determined under clause (i) for such cost reporting periods.
Prospective payment for long-term care hospitals
Reference to establishment and implementation of system
Update for rate year 2008
Implementation for rate year 2010 and subsequent years
In general
Subject to subparagraph (C), in implementing the system described in paragraph (1) for rate year 2010 and each subsequent rate year, any annual update to a standard Federal rate for discharges for the hospital during the rate year, shall be reduced—
for rate year 2012 and each subsequent rate year, by the productivity adjustment described in subsection (b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and
for each of rate years 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in paragraph (4).
Special rule
Additional special rule
Other adjustment
For purposes of paragraph (3)(A)(ii), the other adjustment described in this paragraph is—
for rate year 2010, 0.25 percentage point;
for rate year 2011, 0.50 percentage point;
for each of the rate years beginning in 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point;
for rate year 2014, 0.3 percentage point;
for each of rate years 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and
for each of rate years 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.
Quality reporting
Reduction in update for failure to report
In general
Special rule
Noncumulative application
Submission of quality data
Quality measures
In general
Exception
Time frame
Additional quality measures
Public availability of data submitted
Submission of additional data
In general
Standardized patient assessment data
Submission
Non-duplication
Application of site neutral IPPS payment rate in certain cases
General application of site neutral IPPS payment amount for discharges failing to meet applicable criteria
In general
Exception for certain discharges meeting criteria
Clause (i) shall not apply (and payment shall be made to a long-term care hospital without regard to this paragraph) for a discharge if—
the discharge meets the ICU criterion under clause (iii) or the ventilator criterion under clause (iv); and
the discharge does not have a principal diagnosis relating to a psychiatric diagnosis or to rehabilitation.
Intensive care unit (ICU) criterion
In general
Determining ICU days
Ventilator criterion
The criterion specified in this clause (in this paragraph referred to as the “ventilator criterion”), for a discharge from a long-term care hospital, is that—
the stay in the long-term care hospital ending with such discharge was immediately preceded by a discharge from a stay in a subsection (d) hospital; and
the individual discharged was assigned to a Medicare-Severity-Long-Term-Care-Diagnosis-Related-Group (MS–LTC–DRG) based on the receipt of ventilator services of at least 96 hours.
Applicable site neutral payment rate defined
In general
In this paragraph, the term “applicable site neutral payment rate” means—
for discharges in cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the blended payment rate specified in clause (iii); and
for discharges in cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 2020 or a subsequent fiscal year, the site neutral payment rate (as defined in clause (ii)).
Site neutral payment rate defined
Subject to clause (iv), in this paragraph, the term “site neutral payment rate” means the lower of—
the IPPS comparable per diem amount determined under paragraph (d)(4) of section 412.529 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, including any applicable outlier payments under section 412.525 of such title; or
100 percent of the estimated cost for the services involved.
Blended payment rate
The blended payment rate specified in this clause, for a long-term care hospital for inpatient hospital services for a discharge, is comprised of—
half of the site neutral payment rate (as defined in clause (ii)) for the discharge; and
half of the payment rate that would otherwise be applicable to such discharge without regard to this paragraph, as determined by the Secretary.
Adjustment
Limiting payment for all hospital discharges to site neutral payment rate for hospitals failing to meet applicable LTCH discharge thresholds
Notice of LTCH discharge payment percentage
Limitation
For cost reporting periods beginning during or after fiscal year 2020, if the Secretary determines for a long-term care hospital that its LTCH discharge payment percentage for the period is not at least 50 percent—
the Secretary shall inform the hospital of such fact; and
subject to clause (iii), for all discharges in the hospital in each succeeding cost reporting period, the payment amount under this subsection shall be the payment amount that would apply under subsection (d) for the discharge if the hospital were a subsection (d) hospital.
Process for reinstatement
LTCH discharge payment percentage
In this subparagraph, the term “LTCH discharge payment percentage” means, with respect to a long-term care hospital for a cost reporting period beginning during or after fiscal year 2020, the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of—
the number of Medicare fee-for-service discharges for such hospital and period for which payment is not made at the site neutral payment rate, to
the total number of Medicare fee-for-service discharges for such hospital and period.
Inclusion of subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals
Temporary exception for certain severe wound discharges from certain long-term care hospitals
In general
In the case of a discharge occurring prior to
is from a long-term care hospital that is—
identified by the last sentence of subsection (d)(1)(B); and
located in a rural area (as defined in subsection (d)(2)(D)) or treated as being so located pursuant to subsection (d)(8)(E); and
the individual discharged has a severe wound.
Severe wound defined
Temporary exception for certain spinal cord specialty hospitals
For discharges in cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal years 2018 and 2019, subparagraph (A)(i) shall not apply (and payment shall be made to a long-term care hospital without regard to this paragraph) if such discharge is from a long-term care hospital that meets each of the following requirements:
Not-for-profit
Primarily providing treatment for catastrophic spinal cord or acquired brain injuries or other paralyzing neuromuscular conditions
Significant out-of-state admissions
In general
Implementation
Non-application of Paperwork Reduction Act
Additional temporary exception for certain severe wound discharges from certain long-term care hospitals
In general
For a discharge occurring in a cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2018, subparagraph (A)(i) shall not apply (and payment shall be made to a long-term care hospital without regard to this paragraph) if such discharge—
is from a long-term care hospital identified by the last sentence of subsection (d)(1)(B);
is classified under MS–LTCH–DRG 602, 603, 539, or 540; and
is with respect to an individual treated by a long-term care hospital for a severe wound.
Severe wound defined
Wound defined
Treatment of high cost outlier payments
Adjustment to the standard Federal payment rate for estimated high cost outlier payments
Limitation on high cost outlier payment amounts
Waiver of budget neutrality
No effect on site neutral high cost outlier payment rate
Incentives for adoption and meaningful use of certified EHR technology
In general
Payment amount
In general
Subject to the succeeding subparagraphs of this paragraph, the applicable amount specified in this subparagraph for an eligible hospital for a payment year is equal to the product of the following:
Initial amount
The sum of—
the base amount specified in subparagraph (B); plus
the discharge related amount specified in subparagraph (C) for a 12-month period selected by the Secretary with respect to such payment year.
Medicare share
Transition factor
Base amount
Discharge related amount
The discharge related amount specified in this subparagraph for a 12-month period selected by the Secretary shall be determined as the sum of the amount, estimated based upon total discharges for the eligible hospital (regardless of any source of payment) for the period, for each discharge up to the 23,000th discharge as follows:
For the first through 1,149th discharge, $0.
For the 1,150th through the 23,000th discharge, $200.
For any discharge greater than the 23,000th, $0.
Medicare share
The Medicare share specified under this subparagraph for an eligible hospital for a period selected by the Secretary for a payment year is equal to the fraction—
the numerator of which is the sum (for such period and with respect to the eligible hospital) of—
the estimated number of inpatient-bed-days (as established by the Secretary) which are attributable to individuals with respect to whom payment may be made under part A; and
the estimated number of inpatient-bed-days (as so established) which are attributable to individuals who are enrolled with a Medicare Advantage organization under part C; and
the denominator of which is the product of—
the estimated total number of inpatient-bed-days with respect to the eligible hospital during such period; and
the estimated total amount of the eligible hospital’s charges during such period, not including any charges that are attributable to charity care (as such term is used for purposes of hospital cost reporting under this subchapter), divided by the estimated total amount of the hospital’s charges during such period.
Insofar as the Secretary determines that data are not available on charity care necessary to calculate the portion of the formula specified in clause (ii)(II), the Secretary shall use data on uncompensated care and may adjust such data so as to be an appropriate proxy for charity care including a downward adjustment to eliminate bad debt data from uncompensated care data. In the absence of the data necessary, with respect to a hospital, for the Secretary to compute the amount described in clause (ii)(II), the amount under such clause shall be deemed to be 1. In the absence of data, with respect to a hospital, necessary to compute the amount described in clause (i)(II), the amount under such clause shall be deemed to be 0.
Transition factor specified
In general
Subject to clause (ii), the transition factor specified in this subparagraph for an eligible hospital for a payment year is as follows:
For the first payment year for such hospital, 1.
For the second payment year for such hospital, ¾.
For the third payment year for such hospital, ½.
For the fourth payment year for such hospital, ¼.
For any succeeding payment year for such hospital, 0.
Phase down for eligible hospitals first adopting EHR after 2013
Form of payment
Payment year defined
In general
First, second, etc. payment year
Meaningful EHR user
In general
For purposes of paragraph (1), an eligible hospital shall be treated as a meaningful EHR user for an EHR reporting period for a payment year (or, for purposes of subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix), for an EHR reporting period under such subsection for a fiscal year) if each of the following requirements are met:
Meaningful use of certified EHR technology
Information exchange
Reporting on measures using EHR
The Secretary shall seek to improve the use of electronic health records and health care quality over time.
Reporting on measures
Selection
The Secretary shall select measures for purposes of subparagraph (A)(iii) but only consistent with the following:
The Secretary shall provide preference to clinical quality measures that have been selected for purposes of applying subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii) or that have been endorsed by the entity with a contract with the Secretary under section 1395aaa(a) of this title.
Prior to any measure (other than a clinical quality measure that has been selected for purposes of applying subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii)) being selected under this subparagraph, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register such measure and provide for a period of public comment on such measure.
Limitations
Coordination of reporting of information
Demonstration of meaningful use of certified EHR technology and information exchange
In general
An eligible hospital may satisfy the demonstration requirement of clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) through means specified by the Secretary, which may include—
an attestation;
the submission of claims with appropriate coding (such as a code indicating that inpatient care was documented using certified EHR technology);
a survey response;
reporting under subparagraph (A)(iii); and
other means specified by the Secretary.
Use of part D data
Application
Limitations on review
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, section 1395oo of this title, or otherwise, of—
the methodology and standards for determining payment amounts under this subsection and payment adjustments under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix), including selection of periods under paragraph (2) for determining, and making estimates or using proxies of, discharges under paragraph (2)(C) and inpatient-bed-days, hospital charges, charity charges, and Medicare share under paragraph (2)(D);
the methodology and standards for determining a meaningful EHR user under paragraph (3), including selection of measures under paragraph (3)(B), specification of the means of demonstrating meaningful EHR use under paragraph (3)(C), and the hardship exception under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix)(II); and
the specification of EHR reporting periods under paragraph (6)(B) 16
Posting on website
Certified EHR technology defined
Definitions
For purposes of this subsection:
EHR reporting period
Eligible hospital
Hospital value-based purchasing program
Establishment
In general
Program to begin in fiscal year 2013
Applicability of Program to hospitals
In general
Exclusions
The term “hospital” shall not include, with respect to a fiscal year, a hospital—
that is subject to the payment reduction under subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii)(I) for such fiscal year;
for which, during the performance period for such fiscal year, the Secretary has cited deficiencies that pose immediate jeopardy to the health or safety of patients;
for which there are not a minimum number (as determined by the Secretary) of measures that apply to the hospital for the performance period for such fiscal year; or
for which there are not a minimum number (as determined by the Secretary) of cases for the measures that apply to the hospital for the performance period for such fiscal year.
Independent analysis
Exemption
Measures
In general
Requirements
For fiscal year 2013
For value-based incentive payments made with respect to discharges occurring during fiscal year 2013, the Secretary shall ensure the following:
Conditions or procedures
Measures are selected under subparagraph (A) that cover at least the following 5 specific conditions or procedures:
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Heart failure.
Pneumonia.
Surgeries, as measured by the Surgical Care Improvement Project (formerly referred to as “Surgical Infection Prevention” for discharges occurring before July 2006).
Healthcare-associated infections, as measured by the prevention metrics and targets established in the HHS Action Plan to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections (or any successor plan) of the Department of Health and Human Services.
HCAHPS
Inclusion of efficiency measures
HCAHPS pain questions
Limitations
Time requirement for prior reporting and notice
Measure not applicable unless hospital furnishes services appropriate to the measure
Replacing measures
Performance standards
Establishment
Achievement and improvement
Timing
Considerations in establishing standards
In establishing performance standards with respect to measures under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account appropriate factors, such as—
practical experience with the measures involved, including whether a significant proportion of hospitals failed to meet the performance standard during previous performance periods;
historical performance standards;
improvement rates; and
the opportunity for continued improvement.
Performance period
Hospital performance score
In general
Application
Appropriate distribution
Higher of achievement or improvement
Weights
No minimum performance standard
Reflection of measures applicable to the hospital
Calculation of value-based incentive payments
In general
Value-based incentive payment amount
The value-based incentive payment amount for each discharge of a hospital in a fiscal year shall be equal to the product of—
the base operating DRG payment amount (as defined in paragraph (7)(D)) for the discharge for the hospital for such fiscal year; and
the value-based incentive payment percentage specified under subparagraph (C) for the hospital for such fiscal year.
Value-based incentive payment percentage
In general
Requirements
In specifying the value-based incentive payment percentage for each hospital for a fiscal year under clause (i), the Secretary shall ensure that—
such percentage is based on the hospital performance score of the hospital under paragraph (5); and
the total amount of value-based incentive payments under this paragraph to all hospitals in such fiscal year is equal to the total amount available for value-based incentive payments for such fiscal year under paragraph (7)(A), as estimated by the Secretary.
Funding for value-based incentive payments
Amount
Adjustment to payments
In general
No effect on other payments
Applicable percent defined
For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term “applicable percent” means—
with respect to fiscal year 2013, 1.0 percent;
with respect to fiscal year 2014, 1.25 percent;
with respect to fiscal year 2015, 1.5 percent;
with respect to fiscal year 2016, 1.75 percent; and
with respect to fiscal year 2017 and succeeding fiscal years, 2 percent.
Base operating DRG payment amount defined
In general
Except as provided in clause (ii), in this subsection, the term “base operating DRG payment amount” means, with respect to a hospital for a fiscal year—
the payment amount that would otherwise be made under subsection (d) (determined without regard to subsection (q)) for a discharge if this subsection did not apply; reduced by
any portion of such payment amount that is attributable to—
payments under paragraphs (5)(A), (5)(B), (5)(F), and (12) of subsection (d); and
such other payments under subsection (d) determined appropriate by the Secretary.
Special rules for certain hospitals
Sole community hospitals and medicare-dependent, small rural hospitals
Hospitals paid under section 1395f
Announcement of net result of adjustments
No effect in subsequent fiscal years
Public reporting
Hospital specific information
In general
The Secretary shall make information available to the public regarding the performance of individual hospitals under the Program, including—
the performance of the hospital with respect to each measure that applies to the hospital;
the performance of the hospital with respect to each condition or procedure; and
the hospital performance score assessing the total performance of the hospital.
Opportunity to review and submit corrections
Website
Aggregate information
The Secretary shall periodically post on the Hospital Compare Internet website aggregate information on the Program, including—
the number of hospitals receiving value-based incentive payments under paragraph (6) and the range and total amount of such value-based incentive payments; and
the number of hospitals receiving less than the maximum value-based incentive payment available to the hospital for the fiscal year involved and the range and amount of such payments.
Implementation
Appeals
Limitation on review
Except as provided in subparagraph (A), there shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, section 1395oo of this title, or otherwise of the following:
The methodology used to determine the amount of the value-based incentive payment under paragraph (6) and the determination of such amount.
The determination of the amount of funding available for such value-based incentive payments under paragraph (7)(A) and the payment reduction under paragraph (7)(B)(i).
The establishment of the performance standards under paragraph (3) and the performance period under paragraph (4).
The measures specified under subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii) and the measures selected under paragraph (2).
The methodology developed under paragraph (5) that is used to calculate hospital performance scores and the calculation of such scores.
The validation methodology specified in subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii)(XI).
Consultation with small hospitals
Promulgation of regulations
Adjustment to hospital payments for hospital acquired conditions
In general
Applicable hospitals
In general
Criteria described
In general
Risk adjustment
Exemption
Hospital acquired conditions
Applicable period
Reporting to hospitals
Reporting hospital specific information
In general
Opportunity to review and submit corrections
Website
Limitations on review
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, section 1395oo of this title, or otherwise of the following:
The criteria described in paragraph (2)(A).
The specification of hospital acquired conditions under paragraph (3).
The specification of the applicable period under paragraph (4).
The provision of reports to applicable hospitals under paragraph (5) and the information made available to the public under paragraph (6).
Hospital readmissions reduction program
In general
With respect to payment for discharges from an applicable hospital (as defined in paragraph (5)(C)) occurring during a fiscal year beginning on or after
the base operating DRG payment amount (as defined in paragraph (2)) for the discharge; and
the adjustment factor (described in paragraph (3)(A)) for the hospital for the fiscal year.
Base operating DRG payment amount defined
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), in this subsection, the term “base operating DRG payment amount” means, with respect to a hospital for a fiscal year—
the payment amount that would otherwise be made under subsection (d) (determined without regard to subsection (o)) for a discharge if this subsection did not apply; reduced by
any portion of such payment amount that is attributable to payments under paragraphs (5)(A), (5)(B), (5)(F), and (12) of subsection (d).
Special rules for certain hospitals
Sole community hospitals and medicare-dependent, small rural hospitals
Hospitals paid under section 1395f of this title
Adjustment factor
In general
For purposes of paragraph (1), subject to subparagraph (D), the adjustment factor under this paragraph for an applicable hospital for a fiscal year is equal to the greater of—
the ratio described in subparagraph (B) for the hospital for the applicable period (as defined in paragraph (5)(D)) for such fiscal year; or
the floor adjustment factor specified in subparagraph (C).
Ratio
The ratio described in this subparagraph for a hospital for an applicable period is equal to 1 minus the ratio of—
the aggregate payments for excess readmissions (as defined in paragraph (4)(A)) with respect to an applicable hospital for the applicable period; and
the aggregate payments for all discharges (as defined in paragraph (4)(B)) with respect to such applicable hospital for such applicable period.
Floor adjustment factor
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the floor adjustment factor specified in this subparagraph for—
fiscal year 2013 is 0.99;
fiscal year 2014 is 0.98; or
fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal years is 0.97.
Transitional adjustment for dual eligibles
In general
Defining groups
Minimizing reporting burden on hospitals
Budget neutral design methodology
Changes in risk adjustment
Consideration of recommendations in IMPACT reports
Consideration of exclusion of patient cases based on V or other appropriate codes
Removal of certain readmissions
Aggregate payments, excess readmission ratio defined
For purposes of this subsection:
Aggregate payments for excess readmissions
The term “aggregate payments for excess readmissions” means, for a hospital for an applicable period, the sum, for applicable conditions (as defined in paragraph (5)(A)), of the product, for each applicable condition, of—
the base operating DRG payment amount for such hospital for such applicable period for such condition;
the number of admissions for such condition for such hospital for such applicable period; and
the excess readmissions ratio (as defined in subparagraph (C)) for such hospital for such applicable period minus 1.
Aggregate payments for all discharges
Excess readmission ratio
In general
Subject to clause (ii), the term “excess readmissions ratio” means, with respect to an applicable condition for a hospital for an applicable period, the ratio (but not less than 1.0) of—
the risk adjusted readmissions based on actual readmissions, as determined consistent with a readmission measure methodology that has been endorsed under paragraph (5)(A)(ii)(I), for an applicable hospital for such condition with respect to such applicable period; to
the risk adjusted expected readmissions (as determined consistent with such a methodology) for such hospital for such condition with respect to such applicable period.
Exclusion of certain readmissions
Definitions
For purposes of this subsection:
Applicable condition
The term “applicable condition” means, subject to subparagraph (B), a condition or procedure selected by the Secretary among conditions and procedures for which—
readmissions (as defined in subparagraph (E)) that represent conditions or procedures that are high volume or high expenditures under this subchapter (or other criteria specified by the Secretary); and
measures of such readmissions—
have been endorsed by the entity with a contract under section 1395aaa(a) of this title; and
such endorsed measures have exclusions for readmissions that are unrelated to the prior discharge (such as a planned readmission or transfer to another applicable hospital).
Expansion of applicable conditions
Applicable hospital
Applicable period
Readmission
Reporting hospital specific information
In general
Opportunity to review and submit corrections
Website
Limitations on review
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, section 1395oo of this title, or otherwise of the following:
The determination of base operating DRG payment amounts.
The methodology for determining the adjustment factor under paragraph (3), including excess readmissions ratio under paragraph (4)(C), aggregate payments for excess readmissions under paragraph (4)(A), and aggregate payments for all discharges under paragraph (4)(B), and applicable periods and applicable conditions under paragraph (5).
The measures of readmissions as described in paragraph (5)(A)(ii).
Readmission rates for all patients
Calculation of readmission
Posting of hospital specific all patient readmission rates
Hospital submission of all patient data
Except as provided for in clause (ii), each specified hospital (as defined in subparagraph (D)(ii)) shall submit to the Secretary, in a form, manner and time specified by the Secretary, data and information determined necessary by the Secretary for the Secretary to calculate the all patient readmission rates described in subparagraph (A).
Instead of a specified hospital submitting to the Secretary the data and information described in clause (i), such data and information may be submitted to the Secretary, on behalf of such a specified hospital, by a state or an entity determined appropriate by the Secretary.
Definitions
For purposes of this paragraph:
The term “all patients” means patients who are treated on an inpatient basis and discharged from a specified hospital (as defined in clause (ii)).
The term “specified hospital” means a subsection (d) hospital, hospitals described in clauses (i) through (v) of subsection (d)(1)(B) and, as determined feasible and appropriate by the Secretary, other hospitals not otherwise described in this subparagraph.
Adjustments to medicare DSH payments
Empirically justified DSH payments
Additional payment
In addition to the payment made to a subsection (d) hospital under paragraph (1), for fiscal year 2014 and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall pay to such subsection (d) hospitals an additional amount equal to the product of the following factors:
Factor one
A factor equal to the difference between—
the aggregate amount of payments that would be made to subsection (d) hospitals under subsection (d)(5)(F) if this subsection did not apply for such fiscal year (as estimated by the Secretary); and
the aggregate amount of payments that are made to subsection (d) hospitals under paragraph (1) for such fiscal year (as so estimated).
Factor two
Fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017
For each of fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, a factor equal to 1 minus the percent change in the percent of individuals under the age of 65 who are uninsured, as determined by comparing the percent of such individuals—
who are uninsured in 2013, the last year before coverage expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as calculated by the Secretary based on the most recent estimates available from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office before a vote in either House on the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 that, if determined in the affirmative, would clear such Act for enrollment); and
who are uninsured in the most recent period for which data is available (as so calculated),
minus 0.1 percentage points for fiscal year 2014 and minus 0.2 percentage points for each of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
2018 and subsequent years
For fiscal year 2018 and each subsequent fiscal year, a factor equal to 1 minus the percent change in the percent of individuals who are uninsured, as determined by comparing the percent of individuals—
who are uninsured in 2013 (as estimated by the Secretary, based on data from the Census Bureau or other sources the Secretary determines appropriate, and certified by the Chief Actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services); and
who are uninsured in the most recent period for which data is available (as so estimated and certified),
minus 0.2 percentage points for each of fiscal years 2018 and 2019.
Factor three
A factor equal to the percent, for each subsection (d) hospital, that represents the quotient of—
the amount of uncompensated care for such hospital for a period selected by the Secretary (as estimated by the Secretary, based on appropriate data (including, in the case where the Secretary determines that alternative data is available which is a better proxy for the costs of subsection (d) hospitals for treating the uninsured, the use of such alternative data)); and
the aggregate amount of uncompensated care for all subsection (d) hospitals that receive a payment under this subsection for such period (as so estimated, based on such data).
Limitations on review
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1395ff of this title, section 1395oo of this title, or otherwise of the following:
Any estimate of the Secretary for purposes of determining the factors described in paragraph (2).
Any period selected by the Secretary for such purposes.
Prospective payment for psychiatric hospitals
Reference to establishment and implementation of system
Implementation for rate year beginning in 2010 and subsequent rate years
In general
In implementing the system described in paragraph (1) for the rate year beginning in 2010 and any subsequent rate year, any update to a base rate for days during the rate year for a psychiatric hospital or unit, respectively, shall be reduced—
for the rate year beginning in 2012 and each subsequent rate year, by the productivity adjustment described in subsection (b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and
for each of the rate years beginning in 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in paragraph (3).
Special rule
Other adjustment
For purposes of paragraph (2)(A)(ii), the other adjustment described in this paragraph is—
for each of the rate years beginning in 2010 and 2011, 0.25 percentage point;
for each of the rate years beginning in 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point;
for the rate year beginning in 2014, 0.3 percentage point;
for each of the rate years beginning in 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and
for each of the rate years beginning in 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.
Quality reporting
Reduction in update for failure to report
In general
Special rule
Noncumulative application
Submission of quality data
Quality measures
In general
Exception
Time frame
Patients’ perspective on care
Not later than for rate year 2031, the quality measures specified under this subparagraph shall include a quality measure of patients’ perspective on care.
Standardized patient assessment data
In general
Standardized patient assessment data described
For purposes of clause (i), the standardized patient assessment data described in this clause, with respect to a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric unit, is data with respect to the following categories:
Functional status, such as mobility and self-care at admission to a psychiatric hospital or unit and before discharge from a psychiatric hospital or unit.
Cognitive function, such as ability to express ideas and to understand, and mental status, such as depression and dementia.
Special services, treatments, and interventions for psychiatric conditions.
Medical conditions and co-morbidities, such as diabetes, congestive heart failure, and pressure ulcers.
Impairments, such as incontinence and an impaired ability to hear, see, or swallow.
Other categories as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
Standardized assessment instrument
In general
Funding
Public availability of data submitted
Additional data and information
In general
Data and information
The data and information to be collected under subparagraph (A) may include—
charges, including those related to ancillary services;
the required intensity of behavioral monitoring, such as cognitive deficit, suicide ideations, violent behavior, and need for physical restraint; and
interventions, such as detoxification services for substance abuse, dependence on respirator, total parenteral nutritional support, dependence on renal dialysis, and burn care.
Method of collection
Revisions to payment rates
In general
Review
Budget neutrality
Additional considerations for diagnosis-related group classifications
In general
Budget neutrality
Relating similar inpatient and outpatient hospital services
Development of HCPCS version of MS–DRG codes
Coverage of surgical MS–DRGs
Publication and dissemination of the HCPCS versions of MS–DRGs
In general
Use of previous analysis done by MedPAC
Definition and reference
In this subsection:
HCPCS
ICD–10–PCS
Source
(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, § 1886, as added and amended Pub. L. 97–248, title I, §§ 101(a)(1), 110,Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Amendments
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Effective Date of 2022 Amendment
Effective Date of 2020 Amendment
Effective Date of 2015 Amendment
Effective Date of 2014 Amendment
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Effective Date of 2010 Amendment
In general.—
Except as otherwise provided, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall implement the amendments made by this section [amending this section] in a manner so as to apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
GME.—
Section 1886(h)(4)(J) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(4)(J)], as added by subsection (a)(1)(B), shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
IME.—
Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(x)(III) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(x)(III)], as added by subsection (b), shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Effective Date of 2007 Amendment
Effective Date of 2006 Amendment
Effective Date of 2003 Amendment
In general.—
The Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall implement the amendments made by this section [amending this section] so that they apply to classification for fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2005.
Reconsiderations of applications for fiscal year 2004 that are denied.—
In the case of an application for a classification of a medical service or technology as a new medical service or technology under section 1886(d)(5)(K) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(K)) that was filed for fiscal year 2004 and that is denied—
the Secretary shall automatically reconsider the application as an application for fiscal year 2005 under the amendments made by this section; and
the maximum time period otherwise permitted for such classification of the service or technology shall be extended by 12 months.”
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
DGME.—
The amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] apply to cost reporting periods that begin on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [
IME.—
The amendment made by paragraph (2) [amending this section] applies to discharges occurring in cost reporting periods that begin on or after such date of enactment.”
DGME.—
The amendment made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] applies to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
IME.—
The amendment made by paragraph (2) [amending this section] applies to discharges occurring on or after
payments to hospitals under section 1886(h) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)) for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
payments to hospitals under section 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(v)) for discharges occurring on or after
Effective Date of 1997 Amendment
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Effective Date of 1993 Amendment
Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
in the case of any services provided during the day immediately preceding the date of a patient’s admission (without regard to whether the services are related to the admission), to services furnished on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [
in the case of diagnostic services (including clinical diagnostic laboratory tests), to services furnished on or after
in the case of any other services, to services furnished on or after
Effective Date of 1989 Amendment
in the case of a hospital classified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as a hospital involved extensively in treatment for or research on cancer under section 1886(d)(5)(I) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(I)] (as redesignated by section 6003(e)(1)(A)) after the date of the enactment of this Act [
in the case of a hospital that is not described in subparagraph (A), such amendments shall apply with respect to portions of cost reporting periods or discharges occurring during and after fiscal year 1987 for purposes of section 1886(g) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(g)], and
such amendments shall take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act for purposes of determining the eligibility of a hospital to receive periodic interim payments under section 1815(e)(2) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395g(e)(2)].”
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
PPS hospitals, drg portion of payment.—
In the case of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in paragraph (6))—
the amendments made by subsections (a) and (c) [amending this section] shall apply to payments made under section 1886(d)(1)(A)(iii) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(A)(iii)] on the basis of discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
PPS sole community hospitals, hospital specific portion of payment.—
In the case of a subsection (d) hospital which receives payments made under section 1886(d)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(A)] because it is a sole community hospital—
the amendment made by subsections (a) and (c) [amending this section] shall apply to payments under section 1886(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I) of the Social Security Act made on the basis of discharges occurring during a cost reporting period of a hospital, for the hospital’s cost reporting period beginning on or after
notwithstanding subparagraph (A), for cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1988, the applicable percentage increase (as defined in section 1886(b)(3)(B) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)]) for the—
first 51 days of the cost reporting period shall be 0 percent,
next 132 days of such period shall be 2.7 percent, and
remainder of such period of the cost reporting period shall be the applicable percentage increase (as so defined, as amended by subsection (a)); and
for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
PPS-exempt hospitals.—
In the case of a hospital that is not a subsection (d) hospital—
the amendments made by subsection (e) [amending this section] shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
notwithstanding subparagraph (A), for the hospital’s cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1988, payment under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] shall be made as though the applicable percentage increase described in section 1886(b)(3)(B) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)] were equal to the product of 2.7 percent and the ratio of 315 to 366; and
for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Definition, regional floor, and technical and conforming amendments.—
The amendments made by subsections (b) and (d) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (f) [amending this section and provisions set out as a note below] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [
Transition for large urban area rates.—
In computing the average standardized amount for hospitals located in a large urban area or other urban area under section 1886(d)(3)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(A)(ii)] (as amended by subsection (c)) for fiscal year 1988, the reference to ‘the respective average standardized amount computed for the previous fiscal year under this subparagraph’ is deemed a reference to the average standardized amount computed for hospitals located in an urban area for the 51-day period beginning on
Definition.—
In this subsection, the term ‘subsection (d) hospital’ has the meaning given such term in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)].”
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Subject to clause (ii), the amendments made by subparagraph (A) [amending this section] shall apply to payments for discharges occurring on or after
An appeal for classification of a rural hospital as a regional referral center, pursuant to the amendments made by subparagraph (A), which is filed before
PPS hospitals, drg portion of payment.—
In the case of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in paragraph (4))—
the amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall apply to payments made under section 1886(d)(1)(A) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(A)] made on the basis of discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
PPS hospitals, hospital specific portion of payment.—
In the case of a subsection (d) hospital—
the amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall apply to payments under section 1886(d)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(A)] made on the basis of discharges occurring during a cost reporting period of a hospital, for the hospital’s cost reporting periods beginning on or after
notwithstanding subparagraph (A), for the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1986, the applicable percentage increase (as defined in section 1886(b)(3)(B) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)]) for the—
first 7 months of the cost reporting period shall be 0 percent, and
for the remaining 5 months of the cost reporting period shall be ½ percent; and
for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
PPS-exempt hospitals.—
In the case of a hospital that is not a subsection (d) hospital—
the amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
notwithstanding subparagraph (A), for the hospital’s cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1986, payment under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] shall be made as though the applicable percentage increase described in section 1886(b)(3)(B) [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)] were equal to 5⁄24 of 1 percent; and
for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Definition.—
In this subsection, the term ‘subsection (d) hospital’ has the meaning given such term in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)].”
Delay in final transition.—
The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to discharges occurring on or after
The amendments made by this section shall not first be applied to discharges occurring as of a date unless, for discharges occurring on that date, the amendments made by section 9105 [amending this section] are also being applied.”
Effective and Termination Dates of 1984 Amendment
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) [amending this section] shall be effective with respect to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
The amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall not apply so as to reduce any payment under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] to a hospital the region of which is deemed to be changed pursuant to such amendment for discharges occurring in any cost reporting period beginning before
Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Except as provided in section 602(l) [amending section 1395cc of this title] and in paragraph (2), the amendments made by the preceding provisions of this title [amending this section and sections 1320c–2, 1395f, 1395n, 1395x, 1395y, 1395cc, 1395mm, 1395oo, 1395rr, and 1395xx of this title] apply to items and services furnished by or under arrangements with a hospital beginning with its first cost reporting period that begins on or after
Section 1866(a)(1)(F) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)(F)] (as added by section 602(f)(1)(C) of this title), section 1862(a)(14) [42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(14)] (as added by section 602(e)(3) of this title) and sections 1886(a)(1)(G) and (H) of such Act [probably should be section 1866(a)(1)(G) and (H), 42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)(G), (H)] (as added by section 602(f)(1)(C) of this title) take effect on
The Secretary shall make an appropriate reduction in the payment amount under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] (as amended by this title) for any discharge, if the admission has occurred before a hospital’s first cost reporting period that begins after September 1983, to take into account amounts payable under title XVIII of that Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] (as in effect before the date of the enactment of this Act [
The Secretary shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice of the interim final DRG prospective payment rates established under subsection (d) of section 1886 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] (as amended by this title) no later than
A modification under paragraph (1) that reduces a prospective payment rate shall apply only to discharges occurring after 30 days after the date the notice of the modification is published in the Federal Register.
Rules to implement the amendments made by this title [amending this section and sections 1320a–1, 1320c–2, 1395f, 1395i–2, 1395n, 1395r, 1395v, 1395w, 1395x, 1395y, 1395cc, 1395mm, 1395oo, 1395rr, and 1395xx of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 1395r and 1395x of this title, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 1395x of this title] shall be established in accordance with the procedure described in this subsection.”
Effective Date
Regulations
Construction of 2010 Amendment
Transfer of Functions
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 119–75
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 119–37
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 119–4
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 118–158
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 118–42
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 117–328
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 117–229
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 117–180
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 116–136
Increasing Access to Post-Acute Care During Emergency Period
Waiver of IRF 3-hour Rule.—
With respect to inpatient rehabilitation services furnished by a rehabilitation facility described in section 1886(j)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(j)(1)) during the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall waive section 412.622(a)(3)(ii) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations), relating to the requirement that patients of an inpatient rehabilitation facility receive at least 15 hours of therapy per week.
Waiver of Site-neutral Payment Rate Provisions for Long-term Care Hospitals.—
With respect to inpatient hospital services furnished by a long-term care hospital described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)) during the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall waive the following provisions of section 1886(m)(6) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(m)(6)):
LTCH 50-percent rule.—
Subparagraph (C)(ii) of such section, relating to the payment adjustment for long-term care hospitals that do not have a discharge payment percentage for the period that is at least 50 percent.
Site-neutral ipps payment rate.—
Subparagraph (A)(i) of such section, relating to the application of the site-neutral payment rate (and payment shall be made to a long-term care hospital without regard to such section) for a discharge if the admission occurs during such emergency period and is in response to the public health emergency described in such section 1135(g)(1)(B).”
Application of Change in Medicare Classification for Certain Hospitals
In general.—
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Payment for inpatient operating costs shall be made on a reasonable cost basis in the manner provided in section 412.526(c)(3) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on
Payment for capital costs shall be made in the manner provided by section 412.526(c)(4) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on such date).
Claims for payment for Medicare beneficiaries who are discharged on or after
Applicable hospital defined.—
In this subsection, the term ‘applicable hospital’ means a hospital that is classified under clause (iv)(II) of section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)) on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act [
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 114–113
Calculation of Length of Stay Excluding Cases Paid on a Site Neutral Basis
Site neutral payment.—
Any patient for whom payment is made at the site neutral payment rate (as defined in section 1886(m)(6)(B)(ii) [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(m)(6)(B)(ii)) of such Act, as added by paragraph (1)).
Medicare advantage.—
Any patient for whom payment is made under a Medicare Advantage plan under part C of title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq.].”
Review of Treatment of Certain LTCHs
Evaluation.—
As part of the annual rulemaking for fiscal year 2015 or fiscal year 2016 to carry out the payment rates under subsection (d) of section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww), the Secretary shall evaluate both the payment rates and regulations governing hospitals which are classified under subclause (II) of subsection (d)(1)(B)(iv) of such section.
Adjustment authority.—
Based upon such evaluation, the Secretary may adjust payment rates under subsection (b)(3) of section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww) for a hospital so classified (such as payment based upon the TEFRA-payment model) and may adjust the regulations governing such hospitals, including applying the regulations governing hospitals which are classified under clause (I) of subsection (d)(1)(B) of such section.”
Special Rule for Fiscal Year 2011 and Adjustment for Certain Hospitals in Fiscal Year 2011
Special rule for fiscal year 2011.—
In general.—
Subject to subparagraph (B), for purposes of implementation of the amendment made by paragraph (1) [amending section 106(a) of div. B of Pub. L. 109–432, set out as a note under this section], including (notwithstanding paragraph (3) of section 117(a) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–173) [set out as a note under this section], as amended by section 124(b) of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–275)) for purposes of the implementation of paragraph (2) of such section 117(a), during fiscal year 2011, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall use the hospital wage index that was promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register on
Exception.—
Beginning on
Adjustment for certain hospitals in fiscal year 2011.—
In general.—
In the case of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in subsection (d)(1)(B) of section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww)) with respect to which—
a reclassification of its wage index for purposes of such section was extended pursuant to the amendment made by paragraph (1); and
the wage index applicable for such hospital for the period beginning on
Timeframe for payments.—
The Secretary shall make payments required under subparagraph (A) by not later than
No Reopening of Previously Bundled Claims
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not reopen a claim, adjust a claim, or make a payment pursuant to any request for payment under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.], submitted by an entity (including a hospital or an entity wholly owned or operated by the hospital) for services described in paragraph (2) for purposes of treating, as unrelated to a patient’s inpatient admission, services provided during the 3 days (or, in the case of a hospital that is not a subsection (d) hospital, during the 1 day) immediately preceding the date of the patient’s inpatient admission.
Services described.—
For purposes of paragraph (1), the services described in this paragraph are other services related to the admission (as described in section 1886(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(4)), as amended by subsection (a)) which were previously included on a claim or request for payment submitted under part A of title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] for which a reopening, adjustment, or request for payment under part B of such title [42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.], was not submitted prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [
Implementation of Amendment by Pub. L. 111–192
Payment for Qualifying Hospitals
In General.—
From the amount available under subsection (b), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide for a payment to qualifying hospitals (as defined in subsection (d)) for fiscal years 2011 and 2012 of the amount determined under subsection (c).
Amounts Available.—
There shall be available from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund $400,000,000 for payments under this section for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
Payment Amount.—
The amount of payment under this section for a qualifying hospital shall be determined, in a manner consistent with the amount available under subsection (b), in proportion to the portion of the amount of the aggregate payments under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] to the hospital for fiscal year 2009 bears to the sum of all such payments to all qualifying hospitals for such fiscal year.
Qualifying Hospital Defined.—
In this section, the term ‘qualifying hospital’ means a subsection (d) hospital (as defined for purposes of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act) that is located in a county that ranks, based upon its ranking in age, sex, and race adjusted spending for benefits under parts A and B under title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.] per enrollee, within the lowest quartile of such counties in the United States.”
Value-Based Purchasing Demonstration Programs
Value-based purchasing demonstration program for inpatient critical access hospitals.—
Establishment.—
In general.—
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [
Duration.—
The demonstration program under this paragraph shall be conducted for a 3-year period.
Sites.—
The Secretary shall conduct the demonstration program under this paragraph at an appropriate number (as determined by the Secretary) of critical access hospitals. The Secretary shall ensure that such hospitals are representative of the spectrum of such hospitals that participate in the Medicare program.
Waiver authority.—
The Secretary may waive such requirements of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 1395 et seq.] as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration program under this paragraph.
Budget neutrality requirement.—
In conducting the demonstration program under this section [amending this section and enacting this note], the Secretary shall ensure that the aggregate payments made by the Secretary do not exceed the amount which the Secretary would have paid if the demonstration program under this section was not implemented.
Report.—
Not later than 18 months after the completion of the demonstration program under this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the demonstration program together with—
recommendations on the establishment of a permanent value-based purchasing program under the Medicare program for critical access hospitals with respect to inpatient critical access hospital services; and
recommendations for such other legislation and administrative action as the Secretary determines appropriate.
Value-based purchasing demonstration program for hospitals excluded from hospital value-based purchasing program as a result of insufficient numbers of measures and cases.—
Establishment.—
In general.—
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [
Applicable hospital defined.—
For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘applicable hospital’ means a hospital described in subclause (III) or (IV) of section 1886(o)(1)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(o)(1)(C)(ii)], as added by subsection (a)(1).
Duration.—
The demonstration program under this paragraph shall be conducted for a 3-year period.
Sites.—
The Secretary shall conduct the demonstration program under this paragraph at an appropriate number (as determined by the Secretary) of applicable hospitals. The Secretary shall ensure that such hospitals are representative of the spectrum of such hospitals that participate in the Medicare program.
Waiver authority.—
The Secretary may waive such requirements of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 1395 et seq.] as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration program under this paragraph.
Budget neutrality requirement.—
In conducting the demonstration program under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the aggregate payments made by the Secretary do not exceed the amount which the Secretary would have paid if the demonstration program under this section was not implemented.
Report.—
Not later than 18 months after the completion of the demonstration program under this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the demonstration program together with—
recommendations on the establishment of a permanent value-based purchasing program under the Medicare program for applicable hospitals with respect to inpatient hospital services; and
recommendations for such other legislation and administrative action as the Secretary determines appropriate.”
Reforming the Medicare Hospital Wage Index System
Plan for Reforming the Medicare Hospital Wage Index System
In general.—
Not later than
Details.—
In developing the plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall take into account the goals for reforming such system set forth in the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission June 2007 report entitled ‘Report to Congress: Promoting Greater Efficiency in Medicare’, including establishing a new hospital compensation index system that—
uses Bureau of Labor Statistics data, or other data or methodologies, to calculate relative wages for each geographic area involved;
minimizes wage index adjustments between and within metropolitan statistical areas and statewide rural areas;
includes methods to minimize the volatility of wage index adjustments that result from implementation of policy, while maintaining budget neutrality in applying such adjustments;
takes into account the effect that implementation of the system would have on health care providers and on each region of the country;
addresses issues related to occupational mix, such as staffing practices and ratios, and any evidence on the effect on quality of care or patient safety as a result of the implementation of the system; and
provides for a transition.
Consultation.—
In developing the plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with relevant affected parties.
Use of Particular Criteria for Determining Reclassifications.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in making decisions on applications for reclassification of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in paragraph (1)(B) of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d))[)] for the purposes described in paragraph (10)(D)(v) of such section for fiscal year 2011 and each subsequent fiscal year (until the first fiscal year beginning on or after the date that is 1 year after the Secretary of Health and Human Services submits the report to Congress under subsection (b)), the Geographic Classification Review Board established under paragraph (10) of such section shall use the average hourly wage comparison criteria used in making such decisions as of
Application of Budget Neutrality on a National Basis in the Calculation of the Medicare Hospital Wage Index Floor
Effect on Temporary FTE Cap Adjustments
Graduate Nurse Education Demonstration
In General.—
Establishment.—
In general.—
The Secretary shall establish a graduate nurse education demonstration under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) under which an eligible hospital may receive payment for the hospital’s reasonable costs (described in paragraph (2)) for the provision of qualified clinical training to advance practice nurses.
Number.—
The demonstration shall include up to 5 eligible hospitals.
Written agreements.—
Eligible hospitals selected to participate in the demonstration shall enter into written agreements pursuant to subsection (b) in order to reimburse the eligible partners of the hospital the share of the costs attributable to each partner.
Costs described.—
In general.—
Subject to subparagraph (B) and subsection (d), the costs described in this paragraph are the reasonable costs (as described in section 1861(v) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(v))) of each eligible hospital for the clinical training costs (as determined by the Secretary) that are attributable to providing advanced practice registered nurses with qualified training.
Limitation.—
With respect to a year, the amount reimbursed under subparagraph (A) may not exceed the amount of costs described in subparagraph (A) that are attributable to an increase in the number of advanced practice registered nurses enrolled in a program that provides qualified training during the year and for which the hospital is being reimbursed under the demonstration, as compared to the average number of advanced practice registered nurses who graduated in each year during the period beginning on
Waiver authority.—
The Secretary may waive such requirements of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 1395 et seq.] as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration.
Administration.—
Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, shall not apply to the implementation of this section.
Written Agreements With Eligible Partners.—
No payment shall be made under this section to an eligible hospital unless such hospital has in effect a written agreement with the eligible partners of the hospital. Such written agreement shall describe, at a minimum—
the obligations of the eligible partners with respect to the provision of qualified training; and
the obligation of the eligible hospital to reimburse such eligible partners applicable (in a timely manner) for the costs of such qualified training attributable to partner.
Evaluation.—
Not later than
The growth in the number of advanced practice registered nurses with respect to a specific base year as a result of the demonstration.
The growth for each of the specialties described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (e)(1).
The costs to the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act as a result of the demonstration.
Other items the Secretary determines appropriate and relevant.
Funding.—
In general.—
There is hereby appropriated to the Secretary, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2015 to carry out this section, including the design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the demonstration.
Proration.—
If the aggregate payments to eligible hospitals under the demonstration exceed $50,000,000 for a fiscal year described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall prorate the payment amounts to each eligible hospital in order to ensure that the aggregate payments do not exceed such amount.
Without fiscal year limitation.—
Amounts appropriated under this subsection shall remain available without fiscal year limitation.
Definitions.—
In this section:
Advanced practice registered nurse.—
The term ‘advanced practice registered nurse’ includes the following:
A clinical nurse specialist (as defined in subsection (aa)(5) of section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x)).
A nurse practitioner (as defined in such subsection).
A certified registered nurse anesthetist (as defined in subsection (bb)(2) of such section).
A certified nurse-midwife (as defined in subsection (gg)(2) of such section).
Applicable non-hospital community-based care setting.—
The term ‘applicable non-hospital community-based care setting’ means a non-hospital community-based care setting which has entered into a written agreement (as described in subsection (b)) with the eligible hospital participating in the demonstration. Such settings include Federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, and other non-hospital settings as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
Applicable school of nursing.—
The term ‘applicable school of nursing’ means an accredited school of nursing (as defined in section 801 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 296]) which has entered into a written agreement (as described in subsection (b)) with the eligible hospital participating in the demonstration.
Demonstration.—
The term ‘demonstration’ means the graduate nurse education demonstration established under subsection (a).
Eligible hospital.—
The term ‘eligible hospital’ means a hospital (as defined in subsection (e) of section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x)) or a critical access hospital (as defined in subsection (mm)(1) of such section) that has a written agreement in place with—
1 or more applicable schools of nursing; and
2 or more applicable non-hospital community-based care settings.
Eligible partners.—
The term ‘eligible partners’ includes the following:
An applicable non-hospital community-based care setting.
An applicable school of nursing.
Qualified training.—
In general.—
The term ‘qualified training’ means training—
that provides an advanced practice registered nurse with the clinical skills necessary to provide primary care, preventive care, transitional care, chronic care management, and other services appropriate for individuals entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.], or enrolled under part B of such title [42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.]; and
subject to subparagraph (B), at least half of which is provided in a non-hospital community-based care setting.
Waiver of requirement half of training be provided in non-hospital community-based care setting in certain areas.—
The Secretary may waive the requirement under subparagraph (A)(ii) with respect to eligible hospitals located in rural or medically underserved areas.
Secretary.—
The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
Payment for Long-Term Care Hospital Services
Delay in application of 25 percent patient threshold payment adjustment.—
The Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall not apply, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
through
such section or section 412.534 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or any similar provisions, to a long-term care hospital identified by the amendment made by section 4417(a) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–33) [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section].
Payment for hospitals-within-hospitals.—
In general.—
Payment to an applicable long-term care hospital or satellite facility which is located in a rural area or which is co-located with an urban single or MSA dominant hospital under paragraphs (d)(1), (e)(1), and (e)(4) of section 412.534 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or any similar provision, shall not be subject to any payment adjustment under such section if no more than 75 percent of the hospital’s Medicare discharges (other than discharges described in paragraph (d)(2) or (e)(3) of such section) are admitted from a co-located hospital.
Co-located long-term care hospitals and satellite facilities.—
In general.—
Payment to an applicable long-term care hospital or satellite facility which is co-located with another hospital shall not be subject to any payment adjustment under section 412.534 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or any similar provision, if no more than 50 percent of the hospital’s Medicare discharges (other than discharges described in paragraph (c)(3) of such section) are admitted from a co-located hospital.
Applicable long-term care hospital or satellite facility defined.—
In this paragraph, the term ‘applicable long-term care hospital or satellite facility’ means a hospital or satellite facility that is subject to the transition rules under section 412.534(g) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or any similar provision, or that is described in section 412.22(h)(3)(i) of such title.
Effective date.—
Subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
No application of very short-stay outlier policy.—
The Secretary shall not apply, for the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the amendments finalized on
No application of one-time adjustment to standard amount.—
The Secretary shall not, for the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, make the one-time prospective adjustment to long-term care hospital prospective payment rates provided for in section 412.523(d)(3) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or any similar provision.”
Moratorium on the Establishment of Long-Term Care Hospitals, Long-Term Care Satellite Facilities and on the Increase of Long-Term Care Hospital Beds in Existing Long-Term Care Hospitals or Satellite Facilities
In general.—
During the 5-year period (and for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of paragraph (7) of this subsection [
subject to paragraph (2), on the establishment and classification of a long-term care hospital or satellite facility, other than an existing long-term care hospital or facility; and
subject to paragraph (3), on an increase of long-term care hospital beds in existing long-term care hospitals or satellite facilities.
Exception for certain long-term care hospitals.—
The moratorium under paragraph (1)(A) shall not apply to a long-term care hospital that as of the date of the enactment of this Act—
began its qualifying period for payment as a long-term care hospital under section 412.23(e) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, on or before the date of the enactment of this Act;
has a binding written agreement with an outside, unrelated party for the actual construction, renovation, lease, or demolition for a long-term care hospital, and has expended, before the date of the enactment of this Act, at least 10 percent of the estimated cost of the project (or, if less, $2,500,000); or
has obtained an approved certificate of need in a State where one is required on or before the date of the enactment of this Act.
Exception for bed increases during moratorium.—
In general.—
Subject to subparagraph (B), the moratorium under paragraph (1)(B) shall not apply to an increase in beds in an existing hospital or satellite facility if the hospital or facility obtained a certificate of need for an increase in beds that is in a State for which such certificate of need is required and that was issued on or after
is located in a State where there is only one other long-term care hospital; and
requests an increase in beds following the closure or the decrease in the number of beds of another long-term care hospital in the State.
No effect on certain limitation.—
The exception under subparagraph (A) shall not effect the limitation on increasing beds under sections 412.22(h)(3) and 412.22(f) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations.
Existing hospital or satellite facility defined.—
For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘existing’ means, with respect to a hospital or satellite facility, a hospital or satellite facility that received payment under the provisions of subpart O of part 412 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
Judicial review.—
There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ff), section 1878 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395oo), or otherwise, of the application of this subsection by the Secretary.
Limitation on application of exceptions.—
Paragraphs (2) and (3) shall not apply during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of paragraph (7) of this subsection [
Additional exception for certain long-term care hospitals.—
Any moratorium under paragraph (1) shall not apply to a long-term care hospital that—
began its qualifying period for payment as a long-term care hospital under section 412.23(e) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, on or before the date of enactment of this paragraph [
has a binding written agreement as of the date of the enactment of this paragraph with an outside, unrelated party for the actual construction, renovation, lease, or demolition for a long-term care hospital, and has expended, before such date of enactment, at least 10 percent of the estimated cost of the project (or, if less, $2,500,000); or
has obtained an approved certificate of need in a State where one is required on or before such date of enactment.”
Expanded Review of Medical Necessity
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide, under contracts with one or more appropriate fiscal intermediaries or medicare administrative contractors under section 1874A(a)(4)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395kk–1(a)(4)(G) [now 42 U.S.C. 1395kk–1(a)(4)(H)]), for reviews of the medical necessity of admissions to long-term care hospitals (described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)]) and continued stay at such hospitals, of individuals entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under part A of title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] consistent with this subsection. Such reviews shall be made for discharges occurring on or after
Review methodology.—
The medical necessity reviews under paragraph (1) shall be conducted on an annual basis in accordance with rules specified by the Secretary. Such reviews shall—
provide for a statistically valid and representative sample of admissions of such individuals sufficient to provide results at a 95 percent confidence interval; and
guarantee that at least 75 percent of overpayments received by long-term care hospitals for medically unnecessary admissions and continued stays of individuals in long-term care hospitals will be identified and recovered and that related days of care will not be counted toward the length of stay requirement contained in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)).
Continuation of reviews.—
Under contracts under this subsection, the Secretary shall establish an error rate with respect to such reviews that could require further review of the medical necessity of admissions and continued stay in the hospital involved and other actions as determined by the Secretary.
Termination of required reviews.—
In general.—
Subject to subparagraph (B), the previous provisions of this subsection shall cease to apply for discharges occurring on or after
Continuation.—
As of the date specified in subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine whether to continue to guarantee, through continued medical review and sampling under this paragraph, recovery of at least 75 percent of overpayments received by long-term care hospitals due to medically unnecessary admissions and continued stays.
Funding.—
The costs to fiscal intermediaries or medicare administrative contractors conducting the medical necessity reviews under paragraph (1) shall be funded from the aggregate overpayments recouped by the Secretary of Health and Human Services from long-term care hospitals due to medically unnecessary admissions and continued stays. The Secretary may use an amount not in excess of 40 percent of the overpayments recouped under this paragraph to compensate the fiscal intermediaries or Medicare administrative contractors for the costs of services performed.”
Extending Certain Medicare Hospital Wage Index Reclassifications
Special exception reclassifications.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall extend for discharges occurring through the last date of the extension of reclassifications under section 106(a) of the Medicare Improvement[s] and Extension Act of 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–432) [set out below], the special exception reclassifications made under the authority of section 1886(d)(5)(I)(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(I)(i)) and contained in the final rule promulgated by the Secretary in the Federal Register on
Use of particular wage index.—
For purposes of implementation of this subsection [par. (1) of this subsection amended section 106(a) of Pub. L. 109–432, set out below] in fiscal years 2008 and 2009, the Secretary shall use the hospital wage index that was promulgated by the Secretary in the Federal Register on
Correction of Application of Wage Index During Tax Relief and Health Care Act Extension
“In the case of a subsection (d) hospital (as defined for purposes of section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww)) with respect to which—
a reclassification of its wage index for purposes of such section was extended for the period beginning on
the wage index applicable for such hospital during such period was lower than the wage index applicable for such hospital during the period beginning on
the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall apply the higher wage index that was applicable for such hospital during the period beginning on
Correction of Mid-Year Reclassification Expiration
Plan for Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a plan to implement a value based purchasing program for payments under the Medicare program for subsection (d) hospitals beginning with fiscal year 2009.
Details.—
Such a plan shall include consideration of the following issues:
The on-going development, selection, and modification process for measures of quality and efficiency in hospital inpatient settings.
The reporting, collection, and validation of quality data.
The structure of value based payment adjustments, including the determination of thresholds or improvements in quality that would substantiate a payment adjustment, the size of such payments, and the sources of funding for the value based payments.
The disclosure of information on hospital performance.
In developing such a plan, the Secretary shall consult with relevant affected parties and shall consider experience with such demonstrations that are relevant to the value based purchasing program under this subsection.”
Extended Phase-In of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Classification Criteria
In General.—
Notwithstanding section 412.23(b)(2) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require a compliance rate that is no greater than the 60 percent compliance rate that became effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Continued Use of Comorbidities.—
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after
IRF Regulation.—
For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘IRF regulation’ means the rule published in the Federal Register on
Medicare Demonstration Projects To Permit Gainsharing Arrangements
Establishment.—
The Secretary shall establish under this section a qualified gainsharing demonstration program under which the Secretary shall approve demonstration projects by not later than
Requirements Described.—
A demonstration project under this section shall meet the following requirements for purposes of maintaining or improving quality while achieving cost savings:
Arrangement for remuneration as share of savings.—
The demonstration project shall involve an arrangement between a hospital and a physician under which the hospital provides remuneration to the physician that represents solely a share of the savings incurred directly as a result of collaborative efforts between the hospital and the physician.
Written plan agreement.—
The demonstration project shall be conducted pursuant to a written agreement that—
is submitted to the Secretary prior to implementation of the project; and
includes a plan outlining how the project will achieve improvements in quality and efficiency.
Patient notification.—
The demonstration project shall include a notification process to inform patients who are treated in a hospital participating in the project of the participation of the hospital in such project.
Monitoring quality and efficiency of care.—
The demonstration project shall provide measures to ensure that the quality and efficiency of care provided to patients who are treated in a hospital participating in the demonstration project is continuously monitored to ensure that such quality and efficiency is maintained or improved.
Independent review.—
The demonstration project shall certify, prior to implementation, that the elements of the demonstration project are reviewed by an organization that is not affiliated with the hospital or the physician participating in the project.
Referral limitations.—
The demonstration project shall not be structured in such a manner as to reward any physician participating in the project on the basis of the volume or value of referrals to the hospital by the physician.
Waiver of Certain Restrictions.—
In general.—
An incentive payment made by a hospital to a physician under and in accordance with a demonstration project shall not constitute—
remuneration for purposes of section 1128B of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b);
a payment intended to induce a physician to reduce or limit services to a patient entitled to benefits under Medicare or a State plan approved under title XIX of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.] in violation of section 1128A of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a); or
a financial relationship for purposes of section 1877 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395nn).
Protection for existing arrangements.—
In no case shall the failure to comply with the requirements described in paragraph (1) affect a finding made by the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [
Program Administration.—
Solicitation of applications.—
By not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Number of projects approved.—
The Secretary shall approve not more than 6 demonstration projects, at least 2 of which shall be located in a rural area.
Duration.—
The qualified gainsharing demonstration program under this section shall be conducted for the period beginning on
Reports.—
Initial report.—
By not later than
Project update.—
By not later than
Quality improvement and savings.—
By not later than
Final report.—
By not later than
Funding.—
In general.—
Out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, there are appropriated to the Secretary for fiscal year 2006 $6,000,000, and for fiscal year 2010, $1,600,000, to carry out this section.
Availability.—
Funds appropriated under paragraph (1) shall remain available for expenditure through fiscal year 2014 or until expended.
Definitions.—
For purposes of this section:
Demonstration project.—
The term ‘demonstration project’ means a project implemented under the qualified gainsharing demonstration program established under subsection (a).
Hospital.—
The term ‘hospital’ means a hospital that receives payment under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)), and does not include a critical access hospital (as defined in section 1861(mm) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(mm))).
Medicare.—
The term ‘Medicare’ means the programs under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.].
Physician.—
The term ‘physician’ means, with respect to a demonstration project, a physician described in paragraph (1) or (3) of section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) who is licensed as such a physician in the area in which the project is located and meets requirements to provide services for which benefits are provided under Medicare. Such term shall be deemed to include a practitioner described in section 1842(e)(18)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(e)(18)(C)).
Secretary.—
The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
More Frequent Update in Weights Used in Hospital Market Basket
More Frequent Updates in Weights.—
After revising the weights used in the hospital market basket under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(iii)) to reflect the most current data available, the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall establish a frequency for revising such weights, including the labor share, in such market basket to reflect the most current data available more frequently than once every 5 years.
Incorporation of Explanation in Rulemaking.—
The Secretary shall include in the publication of the final rule for payment for inpatient hospital services under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) for fiscal year 2006, an explanation of the reasons for, and options considered, in determining frequency established under subsection (a).”
Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program
Establishment of Rural Community Hospital (RCH) Demonstration Program.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish a demonstration program to test the feasibility and advisability of the establishment of rural community hospitals (as defined in subsection (f)(1)) to furnish covered inpatient hospital services (as defined in subsection (f)(2)) to medicare beneficiaries.
Demonstration areas.—
The program shall be conducted in rural areas selected by the Secretary in States with low population densities, as determined by the Secretary.
Application.—
Each rural community hospital that is located in a demonstration area selected under paragraph (2) that desires to participate in the demonstration program under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
Selection of hospitals.—
The Secretary shall select from among rural community hospitals submitting applications under paragraph (3) not more than 15 of such hospitals to participate in the demonstration program under this section.
Duration.—
The Secretary shall conduct the demonstration program under this section for a 5-year period (in this section referred to as the ‘initial 5-year period’) and, as provided in subsection (g), for the 15-year extension period.
Implementation.—
The Secretary shall implement the demonstration program not later than
Payment.—
In general.—
The amount of payment under the demonstration program for covered inpatient hospital services furnished in a rural community hospital, other than such services furnished in a psychiatric or rehabilitation unit of the hospital which is a distinct part, is—
for discharges occurring in the first cost reporting period beginning on or after the implementation of the demonstration program, the reasonable costs of providing such services; and
for discharges occurring in a subsequent cost reporting period under the demonstration program, the lesser of—
the reasonable costs of providing such services in the cost reporting period involved; or
the target amount (as defined in paragraph (2)), applicable to the cost reporting period involved.
Target amount.—
For purposes of paragraph (1)(B)(ii), the term ‘target amount’ means, with respect to a rural community hospital for a particular 12-month cost reporting period—
in the case of the second such cost reporting period for which this subsection is in effect, the reasonable costs of providing such covered inpatient hospital services as determined under paragraph (1)(A), and
in the case of a later cost reporting period, the target amount for the preceding 12-month cost reporting period,
increased by the applicable percentage increase (under clause (i) of section 1886(b)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B))) in the market basket percentage increase (as defined in clause (iii) of such section) for that particular cost reporting period.
Funding.—
In general.—
The Secretary shall provide for the transfer from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i) of such funds as are necessary for the costs of carrying out the demonstration program under this section.
Budget neutrality.—
In conducting the demonstration program under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the aggregate payments made by the Secretary do not exceed the amount which the Secretary would have paid if the demonstration program under this section was not implemented.
Waiver Authority.—
The Secretary may waive such requirements of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) as may be necessary for the purpose of carrying out the demonstration program under this section.
Report.—
Not later than
Definitions.—
In this section:
Rural community hospital defined.—
In general.—
The term ‘rural community hospital’ means a hospital (as defined in section 1861(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(e))) that—
is located in a rural area (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(D))) or treated as being so located pursuant to section 1886(d)(8)(E) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(8)(E));
subject to subparagraph (B), has fewer than 51 acute care inpatient beds, as reported in its most recent cost report;
makes available 24-hour emergency care services; and
is not eligible for designation, or has not been designated, as a critical access hospital under section 1820 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4).
Treatment of psychiatric and rehabilitation units.—
For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), beds in a psychiatric or rehabilitation unit of the hospital which is a distinct part of the hospital shall not be counted.
Covered inpatient hospital services.—
The term ‘covered inpatient hospital services’ means inpatient hospital services, and includes extended care services furnished under an agreement under section 1883 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395tt).”
Applicability of Chapter 35 of Title 44
Report on Extension of Applications Under Redistribution Program
MedPAC Study on Rural Hospital Payment Adjustments
In General.—
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission shall conduct a study of the impact of sections 401 through 406, 411, 416, and 505 [amending this section and sections 1395f, 1395g, 1395i–4, 1395l, 1395m, 1395cc, and 1395tt of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 1395f, 1395g, 1395i–4, 1395l, and 1395m of this title]. The Commission shall analyze the effect on total payments, growth in costs, capital spending, and such other payment effects under those sections.
Reports.—
Interim report.—
Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Final report.—
Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [
GAO Study and Report on Appropriateness of Payments Under the Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Services
Study.—
The Comptroller General of the United States, using the most current data available, shall conduct a study to determine—
the appropriate level and distribution of payments in relation to costs under the prospective payment system under section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww) for inpatient hospital services furnished by subsection (d) hospitals (as defined in subsection (d)(1)(B) of such section); and
whether there is a need to adjust such payments under such system to reflect legitimate differences in costs across different geographic areas, kinds of hospitals, and types of cases.
Report.—
Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Not Budget Neutral
One-Time Appeals Process for Hospital Wage Index Classification
Establishment of Process.—
In general.—
The Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall establish not later than
Process requirements.—
The process established under paragraph (1) shall be consistent with the following:
Such an appeal may be filed as soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Such an appeal shall be heard by the Medicare Geographic Reclassification Review Board.
There shall be no further administrative or judicial review of a decision of such Board.
Reclassification upon successful appeal.—
If the Medicare Geographic Reclassification Review Board determines that the hospital is a qualifying hospital (as defined in subsection (c)), the hospital shall be reclassified to the area selected under paragraph (1). Such reclassification shall apply with respect to discharges occurring during the 3-year period beginning with
Inapplicability of certain provisions.—
Except as the Secretary may provide, the provisions of paragraphs (8) and (10) of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) shall not apply to an appeal under this section.
Application of Reclassification.—
In the case of an appeal decided in favor of a qualifying hospital under subsection (a), the wage index reclassification shall not affect the wage index computation for any area or for any other hospital and shall not be effected in a budget neutral manner. The provisions of this section shall not affect payment for discharges occurring after the end of the 3-year-period referred to in subsection (a).
Qualifying Hospital Defined.—
For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualifying hospital’ means a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)) that—
does not qualify for a change in wage index classification under paragraph (8) or (10) of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) on the basis of requirements relating to distance or commuting; and
meets such other criteria, such as quality, as the Secretary may specify by instruction or otherwise.
The Secretary may modify the wage comparison guidelines promulgated under section 1886(d)(10)(D) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)) in carrying out this section.
Wage Index Classification.—
For purposes of this section, the term ‘wage index classification’ means the geographic area in which it is classified for purposes of determining for a fiscal year the factor used to adjust the DRG prospective payment rate under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) for area differences in hospital wage levels that applies to such hospital under paragraph (3)(E) of such section.
Limitation on Expenditures.—
The aggregate amount of additional expenditures resulting from the application of this section shall not exceed $900,000,000.
Transitional Extension.—
Any reclassification of a county or other area made by Act of Congress for purposes of making payments under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) that expired on
Disregarding Hospital Reclassifications for Purposes of Group Reclassifications.—
For purposes of the reclassification of a group of hospitals in a geographic area under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] for purposes of discharges occurring beginning on
Exception to Initial Residency Period for Geriatric Residency or Fellowship Programs
Clarification of Congressional Intent.—
Congress intended section 1886(h)(5)(F)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(5)(F)(ii)), as added by section 9202 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–272), to provide an exception to the initial residency period for geriatric residency or fellowship programs such that, where a particular approved geriatric training program requires a resident to complete 2 years of training to initially become board eligible in the geriatric specialty, the 2 years spent in the geriatric training program are treated as part of the resident’s initial residency period, but are not counted against any limitation on the initial residency period.
Interim Final Regulatory Authority and Effective Date.—
The Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall promulgate interim final regulations consistent with the congressional intent expressed in this section after notice and pending opportunity for public comment to be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Treatment of Volunteer Supervision
Moratorium on Changes in Treatment.—
During the 1-year period beginning on
Study and Report.—
Study.—
The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study of the appropriateness of alternative payment methodologies under such sections for the costs of training residents in non-hospital settings.
Report.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Furnishing Hospitals With Information To Compute DSH Formula
Special Rules for Payment for Fiscal Year 2001
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
the market basket percentage increase plus 1.1 percentage points for hospitals (other than sole community hospitals) in all areas; and
the market basket percentage increase for sole community hospitals.”
for discharges occurring on or after
for discharges occurring on or after
Inpatient Hospital Services.—
The payment increase provided under the following sections shall not apply to discharges occurring after fiscal year 2001 and shall not be taken into account in calculating the payment amounts applicable for discharges occurring after such fiscal year:
Section 301(b)(2)(A) [set out as a note above] (relating to acute care hospital payment update).
Section 302(b) [set out as a note above] (relating to IME percentage adjustment).
Section 303(b)(2) [set out as a note above] (relating to DSH payments).”
Consideration of Price of Blood and Blood Products in Market Basket Index
MedPAC Study and Report Regarding Certain Hospital Costs
Study.—
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission shall conduct a study on—
any increased costs incurred by subsection (d) hospitals (as defined in paragraph (1)(B) of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d))) in providing inpatient hospital services to medicare beneficiaries under title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] during the period beginning on
complying with new blood safety measure requirements; and
providing such services using new technologies;
the extent to which the prospective payment system for such services under such section provides adequate and timely recognition of such increased costs;
the prospects for (and to the extent practicable, the magnitude of) cost increases that hospitals will incur in providing such services that are attributable to complying with new blood safety measure requirements and providing such services using new technologies during the 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [
the feasibility and advisability of establishing mechanisms under such payment system to provide for more timely and accurate recognition of such cost increases in the future.
Consultation.—
In conducting the study under this subsection, the Commission shall consult with representatives of the blood community, including—
hospitals;
organizations involved in the collection, processing, and delivery of blood; and
organizations involved in the development of new blood safety technologies.
Report.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Process To Permit Statewide Wage Index Calculation and Application
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish a process (based on the voluntary process utilized by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 1848 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4) for purposes of computing and applying a statewide geographic adjustment factor) under which an appropriate statewide entity may apply to have all the geographic areas in a State treated as a single geographic area for purposes of computing and applying the area wage index under section 1886(d)(3)(E) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)). Such process shall be established by
Prohibition on individual hospital reclassification.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Secretary applies a statewide geographic wage index under paragraph (1) with respect to a State, any application submitted by a hospital in that State under section 1886(d)(10) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)) for geographic reclassification shall not be considered.”
Collection of Information on Occupational Mix
the collection of data under paragraph (1) [set out above]; and
the measurement under the third sentence of section 1886(d)(3)(E) [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)], as amended by paragraph (2).”
Payment for Inpatient Services of Psychiatric Hospitals
Expediting Recognition of New Technologies Into Inpatient PPS Coding System
Report.—
Not later than
Implementation.—
Not later than
Consultation Prior to Rulemaking
Special Payments To Maintain 6.5 Percent IME Payment for Fiscal Year 2000
Additional payment.—
In addition to payments made to each subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)) under section 1886(d)(5)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B))) which receives payment for the direct costs of medical education for discharges occurring in fiscal year 2000, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make one or more payments to each such hospital in an amount which, as estimated by the Secretary, is equal in the aggregate to the difference between the amount of payments to the hospital under such section for such discharges and the amount of payments that would have been paid under such section for such discharges if ‘c’ in clause (ii)(IV) of such section equalled 1.6 rather than 1.47. Additional payments made under this subsection shall be made applying the same structure as applies to payments made under section 1886(d)(5)(B) of such Act.
No effect on other payments or determinations.—
In making such additional payments, the Secretary shall not change payments, determinations, or budget neutrality adjustments made for such period under section 1886(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)).”
Data Collection
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require any subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B))) to submit to the Secretary, in the cost reports submitted to the Secretary by such hospital for discharges occurring during a fiscal year, data on the costs incurred by the hospital for providing inpatient and outpatient hospital services for which the hospital is not compensated, including non-medicare bad debt, charity care, and charges for medicaid and indigent care.
Effective date.—
The Secretary shall require the submission of the data described in paragraph (1) in cost reports for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Per Discharge Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals
Modification of requirement.—
In developing the prospective payment system for payment for inpatient hospital services provided in long-term care hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)) under the medicare program under title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] required under section 123 of BBRA [Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(6) [title I, § 123], set out as a note below], the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall examine the feasibility and the impact of basing payment under such a system on the use of existing (or refined) hospital diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) that have been modified to account for different resource use of long-term care hospital patients as well as the use of the most recently available hospital discharge data. The Secretary shall examine and may provide for appropriate adjustments to the long-term hospital payment system, including adjustments to DRG weights, area wage adjustments, geographic reclassification, outliers, updates, and a disproportionate share adjustment consistent with section 1886(d)(5)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)).
Default implementation of system based on existing drg methodology.—
If the Secretary is unable to implement the prospective payment system under section 123 of the BBRA by
Development of System.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a per discharge prospective payment system for payment for inpatient hospital services of long-term care hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)) under the medicare program. Such system shall include an adequate patient classification system that is based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and that reflects the differences in patient resource use and costs, and shall maintain budget neutrality.
Collection of data and evaluation.—
In developing the system described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may require such long-term care hospitals to submit such information to the Secretary as the Secretary may require to develop the system.
Report.—
Not later than
Implementation of Prospective Payment System.—
Notwithstanding section 1886(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)), the Secretary shall provide, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Per Diem Prospective Payment System for Psychiatric Hospitals
Development of System.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a per diem prospective payment system for payment for inpatient hospital services of psychiatric hospitals and units (as defined in paragraph (3)) under the medicare program. Such system shall include an adequate patient classification system that reflects the differences in patient resource use and costs among such hospitals and shall maintain budget neutrality.
Collection of data and evaluation.—
In developing the system described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may require such psychiatric hospitals and units to submit such information to the Secretary as the Secretary may require to develop the system.
Definition.—
In this section, the term ‘psychiatric hospitals and units’ means a psychiatric hospital described in clause (i) of section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)) and psychiatric units described in the matter following clause (v) of such section.
Report.—
Not later than
Implementation of Prospective Payment System.—
Notwithstanding section 1886(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)), the Secretary shall provide, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Study on Impact of Implementation of Prospective Payment System
Study.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study of the impact on utilization and beneficiary access to services of the implementation of the medicare prospective payment system for inpatient hospital services or rehabilitation facilities under section 1886(j) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(j)).
Report.—
Not later than 3 years after the date such system is first implemented, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on such study.”
MedPAC Study on Medicare Payment for Nonphysician Health Professional Clinical Training in Hospitals
In General.—
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission shall conduct a study of medicare payment policy with respect to professional clinical training of different classes of nonphysician health care professionals (such as nurses, nurse practitioners, allied health professionals, physician assistants, and psychologists) and the basis for any differences in treatment among such classes.
Report.—
Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Not Counting Against Numerical Limitation Certain Interns and Residents Transferred from a VA Residency Program That Loses Accreditation
In general.—
Any applicable resident described in paragraph (2) shall not be taken into account in applying any limitation regarding the number of residents or interns for which payment may be made under section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww).
Applicable resident described.—
An applicable resident described in this paragraph is a resident or intern who—
participated in graduate medical education at a facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs;
was subsequently transferred on or after
was transferred because the approved medical residency program in which the resident or intern participated would lose accreditation by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education if such program continued to train residents at the Department of Veterans Affairs facility.
Effective date.—
In general.—
Paragraph (1) applies as if included in the enactment of BBA [the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105–33].
Retroactive payments.—
If the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that a hospital operating an approved medical residency program is owed payments as a result of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall make such payments not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [
GAO Study on Geographic Reclassification
In General.—
The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of the current laws and regulations for geographic reclassification of hospitals to determine whether such reclassification is appropriate for purposes of applying wage indices under the medicare program and whether such reclassification results in more accurate payments for all hospitals. Such study shall examine data on the number of hospitals that are reclassified and their reclassified status in determining payments under the medicare program. The study shall evaluate—
the magnitude of the effect of geographic reclassification on rural hospitals that are not reclassified;
whether the current thresholds used in geographic reclassification reclassify hospitals to the appropriate labor markets;
the effect of eliminating geographic reclassification through use of the occupational mix data;
the group reclassification policy;
changes in the number of reclassifications and the compositions of the groups;
the effect of State-specific budget neutrality compared to national budget neutrality; and
whether there are sufficient controls over the intermediary evaluation of the wage data reported by hospitals.
Report.—
Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Continuing Treatment of Previously Designated Centers
In general.—
Any hospital classified as a rural referral center by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 1886(d)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(C)] for fiscal year 1991 shall be classified as such a rural referral center for fiscal year 1998 and each subsequent fiscal year.
Budget neutrality.—
The provisions of section 1886(d)(8)(D) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(8)(D)] shall apply to reclassifications made pursuant to paragraph (1) in the same manner as such provisions apply to a reclassification under section 1886(d)(10) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)].”
Hospital Geographic Reclassification Permitted for Purposes of Disproportionate Share Payment Adjustments
In General.—
For the period described in subsection (c), the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board shall consider the application under section 1886(d)(10)(C)(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(C)(i)) of a hospital described in 1886(d)(1)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)) to change the hospital’s geographic classification for purposes of determining for a fiscal year eligibility for and amount of additional payment amounts under section 1886(d)(5)(F) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)).
Applicable Guidelines.—
The Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board shall apply the guidelines established for reclassification under subclause (I) of section 1886(d)(10)(C)(i) of such Act to reclassification by reason of subsection (a) until the Secretary of Health and Human Services promulgates separate guidelines for such reclassification.
Period Described.—
The period described in this subsection is the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [
Temporary Relief for Certain Non-Teaching, Non-DSH Hospitals
In general.—
In the case of a hospital described in paragraph (2) for its cost reporting period—
beginning in fiscal year 1998 the amount of payment made to the hospital under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] for discharges occurring during such fiscal year only shall be increased as though the applicable percentage increase (otherwise applicable to discharges occurring during fiscal year 1998 under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i)(XIII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)(XIII))) had been increased by 0.5 percentage points; and
beginning in fiscal year 1999 the amount of payment made to the hospital under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act for discharges occurring during such fiscal year only shall be increased as though the applicable percentage increase (otherwise applicable to discharges occurring during fiscal year 1999 under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i)(XIV) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)(XIV))) had been increased by 0.3 percentage points.
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply in computing the increase under subparagraph (B) and neither subparagraph shall affect payment for discharges for any hospital occurring during a fiscal year after fiscal year 1999. Payment increases under this subsection for discharges occurring during a fiscal year are subject to settlement after the close of the fiscal year.
Hospitals covered.—
A hospital described in this paragraph for a cost reporting period is a hospital—
that is described in paragraph (3) for such period;
that is located in a State in which the amount of the aggregate payments under section 1886(d) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] for hospitals located in the State and described in paragraph (3) for their cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 1995 is less than the aggregate allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in section 1886(a)(4) of such Act) for all such hospitals in such State with respect to such cost reporting periods; and
with respect to which the payments under section 1886(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) for discharges occurring in the cost reporting period involved, as estimated by the Secretary, is less than the allowable operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in section 1886(a)(4) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(4))[)] for such hospital for such period, as estimated by the Secretary.
Non-teaching, non-DSH hospitals described.—
A hospital described in this paragraph for a cost reporting period is a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B))) that—
is not receiving any additional payment amount described in section 1886(d)(5)(F) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)) for discharges occurring during the period;
is not receiving any additional payment under section 1886(d)(5)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)) or a payment under section 1886(h) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)) for discharges occurring during the period; and
does not qualify for payment under section 1886(d)(5)(G) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(G)) for the period.”
Formula for Additional Payment Amounts; Report
Report on New Payment Formula.—
Report.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Factors in Determination of Formula.—
In determining such formula the Secretary shall—
establish a single threshold for costs incurred by hospitals in serving low-income patients, and
consider the costs described in paragraph (3).
The costs described in this paragraph are as follows:
The costs incurred by the hospital during a period (as determined by the Secretary) of furnishing hospital services to individuals who are entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] and who receive supplemental security income benefits under title XVI of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.] (excluding any supplementation of those benefits by a State under section 1616 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382e)).
The costs incurred by the hospital during a period (as so determined) of furnishing hospital services to individuals who receive medical assistance under the State plan under title XIX of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.] and are not entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] (including individuals enrolled in a managed care organization (as defined in section 1903(m)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(m)(1)(A)) or any other managed care plan under such title and individuals who receive medical assistance under such title pursuant to a waiver approved by the Secretary under section 1115 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1315)).
Data Collection.—
In developing the formula described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may require any subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B))) receiving additional payments by reason of section 1886(d)(5)(F) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)) to submit to the Secretary any information that the Secretary determines is necessary to develop such formula.”
Geographic Reclassification for Certain Disproportionately Large Hospitals
New Guidelines for Reclassification.—
Notwithstanding the guidelines published under section 1886(d)(10)(D)(i)(I) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)(i)(I)), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall publish and use alternative guidelines under which a hospital described in subsection (b) qualifies for geographic reclassification under such section for a fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 1998.
Hospitals Covered.—
A hospital described in this subsection is a hospital that demonstrates that—
the average hourly wage paid by the hospital is not less than 108 percent of the average hourly wage paid by all other hospitals located in the Metropolitan Statistical Area (or the New England County Metropolitan Area) in which the hospital is located;
not less than 40 percent of the adjusted uninflated wages paid by all hospitals located in such Area is attributable to wages paid by the hospital; and
the hospital submitted an application requesting reclassification for purposes of wage index under section 1886(d)(10)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(C)) in each of fiscal years 1992 through 1997 and that such request was approved for each of such fiscal years.”
Floor on Area Wage Index
In General.—
For purposes of section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)) for discharges occurring on or after
Implementation.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall adjust the area wage index referred to in subsection (a) for hospitals not described in such subsection in a manner which assures that the aggregate payments made under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) in a fiscal year for the operating costs of inpatient hospital services are not greater or less than those which would have been made in the year if this section did not apply.
Exclusion of Certain Wages.—
In the case of a hospital that is owned by a municipality and that was reclassified as an urban hospital under section 1886(d)(10) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)] for fiscal year 1996, in calculating the hospital’s average hourly wage for purposes of geographic reclassification under such section for fiscal year 1998, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall exclude the general service wages and hours of personnel associated with a skilled nursing facility that is owned by the hospital of the same municipality and that is physically separated from the hospital to the extent that such wages and hours of such personnel are not shared with the hospital and are separately documented. A hospital that applied for and was denied reclassification as an urban hospital for fiscal year 1998, but that would have received reclassification had the exclusion required by this section been applied to it, shall be reclassified as an urban hospital for fiscal year 1998.”
Report on Effect of Amendments by Pub. L. 105–33, § 4415, on Psychiatric Hospitals
Treatment of Certain Cancer Hospitals; Payment
Application to cost reporting periods.—
Any classification by reason of section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(III) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(v)(III)] (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to 12-month cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Base year.—
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1886(b)(3)(E) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(E)) or other provisions to the contrary, the base cost reporting period for purposes of determining the target amount for any hospital classified by reason of section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(III) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(v)(III)] (as added by subsection (a)) shall be the 12-month cost reporting period beginning on
Deadline for payments.—
Any payments owed to a hospital by reason of this subsection shall be made expeditiously, but in no event later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Application to cost reporting periods.—
Any classification by reason of section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(II) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(v)(II)) (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to all cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Base year.—
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1886(b)(3)(E) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(E)) or other provisions to the contrary, the base cost reporting period for purposes of determining the target amount for any hospital classified by reason of section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(II) of such Act shall be either—
the hospital’s cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1990, or
pursuant to an election under 1886(b)(3)(G) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(G)), as added in section 4413(b), the period provided for under such section.
Deadline for payments.—
Any payments owed to a hospital by reason of this subsection shall be made expeditiously, but in no event later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Report on Exceptions
Development of Proposal on Payments for Long-Term Care Hospitals
In General.—
Legislative proposal.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a legislative proposal for establishing a case-mix adjusted prospective payment system for payment of long-term care hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(iv)) under the medicare program. Such system shall include an adequate patient classification system that reflects the differences in patient resource use and costs among such hospitals.
Collection of data and evaluation.—
In developing the legislative proposal described in paragraph (1), the Secretary—
may require such long-term care hospitals to submit such information to the Secretary as the Secretary may require to develop the proposal; and
shall consider several payment methodologies, including the feasibility of expanding the current diagnosis-related groups and prospective payment system established under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] to apply to payments under the medicare program to long-term care hospitals.
Report.—
Not later than
Dissemination of Information on High Per Discharge Relative Values for In-Hospital Physicians’ Services
Determination and Notice Concerning Hospital-Specific Per Discharge Relative Values.—
In general.—
For 1999 and 2001 the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall determine for each hospital—
the hospital-specific per discharge relative value under subsection (b); and
whether the hospital-specific relative value is projected to be excessive (as determined based on such value represented as a percentage of the median of hospital-specific per discharge relative values determined under subsection (b)).
Notice to subset of medical staffs; evaluation of responses.—
The Secretary shall notify the medical executive committee of a subset of the hospitals identified under paragraph (1)(B) as having an excessive hospital-specific relative value, of the determinations made with respect to the medical staff under paragraph (1). The Secretary shall evaluate the responses of the hospitals so notified with the responses of other hospitals so identified that were not so notified.
Determination of Hospital-Specific Per Discharge Relative Values.—
In general.—
For purposes of this section, the hospital-specific per discharge relative value for the medical staff of a hospital (other than a teaching hospital) for a year shall be equal to the average per discharge relative value (as determined under section 1848(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(c)(2))[)] for physicians’ services furnished to inpatients of the hospital by the hospital’s medical staff (excluding interns and residents) during the second year preceding that calendar year, adjusted for variations in case-mix among hospitals and disproportionate share status and teaching status among hospitals (as determined by the Secretary under paragraph (3)).
Special rule for teaching hospitals.—
The hospital-specific relative value projected for a teaching hospital in a year shall be equal to the sum of—
the average per discharge relative value (as determined under section 1848(c)(2) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(c)(2)]) for physicians’ services furnished to inpatients of the hospital by the hospital’s medical staff (excluding interns and residents) during the second year preceding that calendar year, and
the equivalent per discharge relative value (as determined under such section) for physicians’ services furnished to inpatients of the hospital by interns and residents of the hospital during the second year preceding that calendar year, adjusted for variations in case-mix among hospitals, and in disproportionate share status and teaching status among hospitals (as determined by the Secretary under paragraph (3)).
The Secretary shall determine the equivalent relative value unit per discharge for interns and residents based on the best available data and may make such adjustment in the aggregate.
Adjustment for teaching and disproportionate share hospitals.—
The Secretary shall adjust the allowable per discharge relative values otherwise determined under this subsection to take into account the needs of teaching hospitals and hospitals receiving additional payments under subparagraphs (F) and (G) of section 1886(d)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)). The adjustment for teaching status or disproportionate share shall not be less than zero.
Definitions.—
For purposes of this section:
Hospital.—
The term ‘hospital’ means a subsection (d) hospital as defined in section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)).
Medical staff.—
An individual furnishing a physician’s service is considered to be on the medical staff of a hospital—
if (in accordance with requirements for hospitals established by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations)—
the individual is subject to bylaws, rules, and regulations established by the hospital to provide a framework for the self-governance of medical staff activities,
subject to the bylaws, rules, and regulations, the individual has clinical privileges granted by the hospital’s governing body, and
under the clinical privileges, the individual may provide physicians’ services independently within the scope of the individual’s clinical privileges, or
if the physician provides at least one service to an individual entitled to benefits under this title in that hospital.
Physicians’ services.—
The term ‘physicians’ services’ means the services described in section 1848(j)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(j)(3)).
Rural area; urban area.—
The terms ‘rural area’ and ‘urban area’ have the meaning given those terms under section 1886(d)(2)(D) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(D)).
Secretary.—
The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Teaching hospital.—
The term ‘teaching hospital’ means a hospital which has a teaching program approved as specified in section 1861(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(b)(6)).”
Incentive Payments Under Plans for Voluntary Reduction in Number of Residents; Relation to Demonstration Projects and Authority; Regulations
Relation to Demonstration Projects and Authority.—
Section 1886(h)(6) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(6)], added by subsection (a), other than subparagraph (F)(ii) thereof, shall not apply to any residency training program with respect to which a demonstration project described in paragraph (3) has been approved by the Health Care Financing Administration as of
Effective
A demonstration project described in this paragraph is a project that primarily provides for additional payments under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] in connection with a reduction in the number of residents in a medical residency training program.
Interim, Final Regulations.—
In order to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a) in a timely manner, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may first promulgate regulations, that take effect on an interim basis, after notice and pending opportunity for public comment, by not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Demonstration Project on Use of Consortia
In General.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall establish a demonstration project under which, instead of making payments to teaching hospitals pursuant to section 1886(h) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)], the Secretary shall make payments under this section to each consortium that meets the requirements of subsection (b) and that applies to be included under the project.
Qualifying Consortia.—
For purposes of subsection (a), a consortium meets the requirements of this subsection if the consortium is in compliance with the following:
The consortium consists of a teaching hospital with one or more approved medical residency training programs and one or more of the following entities:
A school of allopathic medicine or osteopathic medicine.
Another teaching hospital, which may be a children’s hospital.
A Federally qualified health center.
A medical group practice.
A managed care entity.
An entity furnishing outpatient services.
Such other entity as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
The members of the consortium have agreed to participate in the programs of graduate medical education that are operated by the entities in the consortium.
With respect to the receipt by the consortium of payments made pursuant to this section, the members of the consortium have agreed on a method for allocating the payments among the members.
The consortium meets such additional requirements as the Secretary may establish.
Amount and Source of Payment.—
The total of payments to a qualifying consortium for a fiscal year pursuant to subsection (a) shall not exceed the amount that would have been paid under section 1886(h) or (k) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h), (k)] for the teaching hospital (or hospitals) in the consortium. Such payments shall be made in such proportion from each of the trust funds established under title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] as the Secretary specifies.”
Recommendations on Long-Term Policies Regarding Teaching Hospitals and Graduate Medical Education
In General.—
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (established under section 1805 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395b–6] and in this section referred to as the ‘Commission’) shall examine and develop recommendations on whether and to what extent medicare payment policies and other Federal policies regarding teaching hospitals and graduate medical education should be changed. Such recommendations shall include recommendations regarding each of the following:
Possible methodologies for making payments for graduate medical education and the selection of entities to receive such payments. Matters considered under this paragraph shall include—
issues regarding children’s hospitals and approved medical residency training programs in pediatrics, and
whether and to what extent payments are being made (or should be made) for training in the nursing and other allied health professions.
Federal policies regarding international medical graduates.
The dependence of schools of medicine on service-generated income.
Whether and to what extent the needs of the United States regarding the supply of physicians, in the aggregate and in different specialties, will change during the 10-year period beginning on
Methods for promoting an appropriate number, mix, and geographical distribution of health professionals.
Consultation.—
In conducting the study under subsection (a), the Commission shall consult with the Council on Graduate Medical Education and individuals with expertise in the area of graduate medical education, including—
deans from allopathic and osteopathic schools of medicine;
chief executive officers (or equivalent administrative heads) from academic health centers, integrated health care systems, approved medical residency training programs, and teaching hospitals that sponsor approved medical residency training programs;
chairs of departments or divisions from allopathic and osteopathic schools of medicine, schools of dentistry, and approved medical residency training programs in oral surgery;
individuals with leadership experience from representative fields of non-physician health professionals;
individuals with substantial experience in the study of issues regarding the composition of the health care workforce of the United States; and
individuals with expertise in health care payment policies.
Report.—
Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Study of Hospital Overhead and Supervisory Physician Components of Direct Medical Education Costs
In General.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study with respect to—
variations among hospitals in the hospital overhead and supervisory physician components of their direct medical education costs taken into account under section 1886(h) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)], and
the reasons for such variations.
Report.—
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [
DRG Prospective Payment Rate Methodology; Transition Rule for Fiscal Year 1998
Hospital Payment Updates; Transition Rule for Fiscal Year 1998
Geographical Reclassification; Special Rule for Applications Received in Fiscal Year 1997
No Standardized Amount Adjustments for Fiscal Years 1992 or 1993
Extension of Regional Referral Center Classifications Through Fiscal Year 1994; Reclassification
Extension of classification through fiscal year 1994.—
Any hospital that is classified as a regional referral center under section 1886(d)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(C)] as of
Permitting hospitals to decline reclassification.—
If any hospital fails to qualify as a rural referral center under section 1886(d)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act as a result of a decision by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board under section 1886(d)(10) of such Act to reclassify the hospital as being located in an urban area for fiscal year 1993 or fiscal year 1994, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall—
notify such hospital of such failure to qualify,
provide an opportunity for such hospital to decline such reclassification, and
if the hospital—
declines such reclassification, administer the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] (other than section 1886(d)(8)(D)) for such fiscal year as if the decision by the Review Board had not occurred, or
fails to decline such reclassification, administer the Social Security Act without regard to paragraph (1).
Requiring lump-sum retroactive payment for hospitals losing classification.—
In general.—
In the case of a hospital described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make a lump-sum payment to the hospital equal to the difference between the aggregate payment made to the hospital under section 1886 of such Act (excluding outlier payments under subsection (d)(5)(A) of such section) during the period of applicability described in subparagraph (B) and the aggregate payment that would have been made to the hospital under such section if, during the period of applicability, the hospital was classified a regional referral center under section 1886(d)(5)(C) of such Act.
Period of applicability.—
In subparagraph (A), the ‘period of applicability’ is the period that begins on
Hospitals Declining Urban Area Reclassifications; Retroactive Payments
Permitting hospitals to decline reclassification.—
If any hospital fails to qualify as a medicare-dependent, small rural hospital under section 1886(d)(5)(G)(i) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(G)(i)] as a result of a decision by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board under section 1886(d)(10) of such Act to reclassify the hospital as being located in an urban area for fiscal year 1993, fiscal year 1994, fiscal year 1998, fiscal year 1999, fiscal year 2000 through fiscal year 2026, or the portion of fiscal year 2027 beginning on
notify such hospital of such failure to qualify,
provide an opportunity for such hospital to decline such reclassification, and
if the hospital declines such reclassification, administer the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] (other than section 1886(d)(8)(D)) for such fiscal year as if the decision by the Review Board had not occurred.
Requiring lump-sum retroactive payment.—
In general.—
In the case of a hospital treated as a medicare-dependent, small rural hospital under section 1886(d)(5)(G) of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make a lump-sum payment to the hospital equal to the difference between the aggregate payment made to the hospital under section 1886 of such Act (excluding outlier payments under subsection (d)(5)(A) of such section) during the period of applicability described in subparagraph (B) and the aggregate payment that would have been made to the hospital under such section if, during the period of applicability, section 1886(d)(5)(G) of such Act had been applied as if the amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] had been in effect.
Period of applicability.—
In subparagraph (A), the ‘period of applicability’ is, with respect to a hospital, the period that begins on the first day of the hospital’s first 12-month cost reporting period that begins after
Adjustment in GME Base-Year Costs of Federal Insurance Contributions Act
In general.—
In determining the amount of payment to be made under section 1886(h) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)] in the case of a hospital described in paragraph (2) for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Hospitals affected.—
A hospital described in this paragraph is a hospital that did not pay FICA taxes with respect to interns and residents in its medical residency training program during the hospital’s base cost reporting period, but is required to pay FICA taxes or make contributions to a retirement system described in paragraph (1) with respect to such interns and residents because of the amendments made by section 11332(b) of OBRA–1990 [Pub. L. 101–508, amending section 3121 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code].
Definitions.—
In this subsection:
The ‘base cost reporting period’ for a hospital is the hospital’s cost reporting period that began during fiscal year 1984.
The term ‘FICA taxes’ means, with respect to a hospital, the taxes under section 3111 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 3111].”
Determination of Area Wage Index for Discharges Occurring January 1, 1991 to October 1, 1993
For purposes of section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)] for discharges occurring on or after
The Secretary shall apply the wage index described in subparagraph (A) without regard to a previous survey of wages and wage-related costs.”
Study and Report on Relationship Between Non-Wage-Related Input Prices and Adjusted Average Standardized Amounts
Deadline for Submission of Applications to Geographic Classification Review Board
Payments for Medical Education Costs
Hospital Graduate Medical Education Recoupment.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not, before
Cap on annual amount of recoupment.—
With respect to overpayments to a hospital described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may not recoup more than 25 percent of the amount of such overpayments from the hospital during a fiscal year.
Effective date.—
Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take effect
University Hospital Nursing Education.—
In general.—
The reasonable costs incurred by a hospital (or by an educational institution related to the hospital by common ownership or control) during a cost reporting period for clinical training (as defined by the Secretary) conducted on the premises of the hospital under approved nursing and allied health education programs that are not operated by the hospital shall be allowable as reasonable costs under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act and reimbursed under such part on a pass-through basis.
Conditions for reimbursement.—
The reasonable costs incurred by a hospital during a cost reporting period shall be reimbursable pursuant to paragraph (1) only if—
the hospital claimed and was reimbursed for such costs during the most recent cost reporting period that ended on or before
the proportion of the hospital’s total allowable costs that is attributable to the clinical training costs of the approved program, and allowable under (b)(1) during the cost reporting period does not exceed the proportion of total allowable costs that were attributable to the clinical training costs during the cost reporting period described in subparagraph (A);
the hospital receives a benefit for the support it furnishes to such program through the provision of clinical services by nursing or allied health students participating in such program; and
the costs incurred by the hospital for such program do not exceed the costs that would be incurred by the hospital if it operated the program itself.
Prohibition against recoupment of costs by secretary.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not recoup payments from (or otherwise reduce or adjust payments under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to) a hospital because of alleged overpayments to such hospital under such title due to a determination that costs which were reported by the hospital on its medicare cost reports for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Refund of amounts recouped.—
If, prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [
Special audit to determine costs.—
In determining the amount of costs incurred by, claimed by, and reimbursed to, a hospital for purposes of this subsection, the Secretary shall conduct a special audit (or use such other appropriate mechanism) to ensure the accuracy of such past claims and payments.
Effective date.—
Except as provided in paragraph (3), the provisions of this subsection shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Hospital Graduate Medical Education Recoupment.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not, before
Cap on annual amount of recoupment.—
With respect to overpayments to a hospital described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may not recoup more than 25 percent of the amount of such overpayments from the hospital during a fiscal year.
Effective date.—
Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take effect
University Hospital Nursing Education.—
In general.—
The reasonable costs incurred by a hospital (or by an educational institution related to the hospital by common ownership or control) during a cost reporting period for clinical training (as defined by the Secretary) conducted on the premises of the hospital under approved nursing and allied health education programs that are not operated by the hospital shall be allowable as reasonable costs under part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act and reimbursed under such part on a pass-through basis.
Conditions for reimbursement.—
The reasonable costs incurred by a hospital during a cost reporting period shall be reimbursable pursuant to paragraph (1) only if—
the hospital claimed and was reimbursed for such costs during the most recent cost reporting period that ended on or before
the proportion of the hospital’s total allowable costs that is attributable to the clinical training costs of the approved program, and allowable under (b)(1) during the cost reporting period does not exceed the proportion of total allowable costs that were attributable to clinical training costs during the cost reporting period described in subparagraph (A);
the hospital receives a benefit for the support it furnishes to such program through the provision of clinical services by nursing or allied health students participating in such program; and
the costs incurred by the hospital for such program do not exceed the costs that would be incurred by the hospital if it operated the program itself.
Prohibition against recoupment of costs by secretary.—
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not recoup payments from (or otherwise reduce or adjust payments under part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to) a hospital because of alleged overpayments to such hospital under such title due to a determination that costs which were reported by the hospital on its medicare cost reports for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Refund of amounts recouped.—
If, prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [
Special audit to determine costs.—
In determining the amount of costs incurred by, claimed by, and reimbursed to, a hospital for purposes of this subsection, the Secretary shall conduct a special audit (or use such other appropriate mechanism) to ensure the accuracy of such past claims and payments.
Effective Date.—
Except as provided in paragraph (3), the provisions of this subsection shall apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after
Development of National Prospective Payment Rates for Current Non-PPS Hospitals
Development of proposal.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a proposal to modify the current system under which hospitals that are not subsection (d) hospitals (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)]) receive payment for the operating and capital-related costs of inpatient hospital services under part A [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] of the medicare program or a proposal to replace such system with a system under which such payments would be made on the basis of nationally-determined average standardized amounts. In developing any proposal under this paragraph to replace the current system with a prospective payment system, the Secretary shall—
take into consideration the need to provide for appropriate limits on increases in expenditures under the medicare program;
provide for adjustments to prospectively determined rates to account for changes in a hospital’s case mix, severity of illness of patients, volume of cases, and the development of new technologies and standards of medical practice;
take into consideration the need to increase the payment otherwise made under such system in the case of services provided to patients whose length of stay or costs of treatment greatly exceed the length of stay or cost of treatment provided for under the applicable prospectively determined payment rate;
take into consideration the need to adjust payments under the system to take into account factors such as a disproportionate share of low-income patients, costs related to graduate medical education programs, differences in wages and wage-related costs among hospitals located in various geographic areas, and other factors the Secretary considers appropriate; and
provide for the appropriate allocation of operating and capital-related costs of hospitals not subject to the new prospective payment system and distinct units of such hospitals that would be paid under such system.
Reports.—
By not later than
By not later than
Guidance to Intermediaries and Hospitals
Freeze in Payments Under Part A of This Subchapter Through December 31, 1990
In General.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of determining the amount of payment for items or services under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] (including payments under section 1886 of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww] attributable to or allocated under such part) during the period described in subsection (b):
The market basket percentage increase (described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii) of the Social Security Act) shall be deemed to be 0 for discharges occurring during such period.
The percentage increase or decrease in the medical care expenditure category of the consumer price index applicable under section 1814(i)(2)(B) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395f(i)(2)(B)] shall be deemed to be 0.
The area wage index applicable to a subsection (d) hospital under section 1886(d)(3)(E) of such Act shall be deemed to be the area wage index applicable to such hospital as of
The percentage change in the consumer price index applicable under section 1886(h)(2)(D) of such Act shall be deemed to be 0.
Description of Period.—
The period referred to in subsection (a) is the period beginning on
Review of Hospital Regulations With Respect to Rural Hospitals
In general.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall review the requirements applicable under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] to determine which requirements could be made less administratively and economically burdensome (without diminishing the quality of care) for hospitals defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)] that are located in a rural area (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D) of such Act). Such review shall specifically include standards related to staffing requirements.
Report.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall report to Congress by
Prohibition on Cost Savings Policies Before Beginning of Fiscal Year
The Secretary may issue such a proposed regulation, instruction, or other policy with respect to the fiscal year before the May 15 preceding the beginning of the fiscal year.
The Secretary may issue such a final regulation, instruction, or other policy with respect to the fiscal year on or after October 15 of the fiscal year.
The Secretary may, at any time, issue such a proposed or final regulation, instruction, or other policy with respect to the fiscal year if required to implement specific provisions under statute.”
Prohibition of Payment Cycle Changes
Extension of Area Wage Index
Adjustments Resulting From Extensions of Regional Floor on Standardized Amounts
Indexing of Future Applicable Percentage Increases
Continuation of Sole Community Hospital Designation for Current Sole Community Hospitals
Additional Payment Resulting From Corrections of Erroneously Determined Wage Index
In general.—
If the Secretary of Health and Human Services (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Secretary’) discovers an error with respect to the determination, adjustment, or computation of the area wage index described in section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)] and subsequently corrects such error, the Secretary shall make an additional payment under title XVIII of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] to a hospital affected by such error for inpatient hospital discharges occurring during the period when the erroneously determined, adjusted, or computed wage index was in effect.
Conditions for additional payment.—
A hospital is eligible for an additional payment under subparagraph (A) only if—
the error resulted from the submission of erroneous data, except that a hospital is not eligible for such additional payment if it submitted such erroneous data;
the error was made with respect to the survey of the 1984 wages and wage-related costs of hospitals in the United States conducted under section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act; and
the correction of the error resulted in an adjustment to the area wage index of not less than 3 percentage points.
Period of applicability.—
A hospital may not receive an additional payment under subparagraph (A) for discharges occurring after
Legislative Proposal Eliminating Separate Average Standardized Amounts
Determination and Recommendations of Payments for Costs of Administering Blood Clotting Factors to Individuals With Hemophilia
Determining Payment Amount.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall determine the amount of payment made to hospitals under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] for the costs of administering blood clotting factors to individuals with hemophilia by multiplying a predetermined price per unit of blood clotting factor (determined in consultation with the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission) by the number of units provided to the individual.
Recommendations on Payments.—
The Prospective Payment Assessment Commission and the Health Care Financing Administration shall develop recommendations with respect to payments to hospitals under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act for the costs of administering blood clotting factors to individuals with hemophilia, and shall submit such recommendations to Congress not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [
Publication of Instructions Relating to Exceptions and Adjustments in Target Amounts
Delay in Recoupment of Certain Nursing and Allied Education Costs
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall not, before
Before
In issuing such regulations—
the Secretary shall allow a comment period of not less than 60 days,
the Secretary shall consult with the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission, and
any final rule shall not be effective prior to
Such regulations shall specify—
the relationship required between an approved nursing or allied health education program and a hospital for the program’s costs to be attributed to the hospital;
the types of costs related to nursing or allied health education programs that are allowable by medicare;
the distinction between costs of approved educational activities as recognized under section 1886(a)(3) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(3)] and educational costs treated as operating costs of inpatient hospital services; and
the treatment of other funding sources for the program.”
Inner-City Hospital Triage Demonstration Project
Establishment.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish a demonstration project in a public hospital that is located in a large urban area and that has established a triage system, under which the Secretary shall make payments out of the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund (in such proportions as the Secretary determines to be appropriate in a year) for 3 years to reimburse the hospital for the reasonable costs of operating the system, including costs—
to train hospital personnel to operate and participate in the system; and
to provide services to patients who might otherwise be denied appropriate and prompt care.
Limitations on Payment.—
The Secretary may not make payment under the demonstration project established under subsection (a) for costs that the Secretary determines are not reasonable.
The amount of payment made under the demonstration project during a single year may not exceed $500,000.”
Transition Adjustments to Target Amounts for Inpatient Hospital Services
Election of Personnel Policy for ProPAC Employees
Adjustments in Payments for Inpatient Hospital Services
PPS hospitals.—
In adjusting DRG prospective payment rates under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)], outlier cutoff points under section 1886(d)(5)(A) of such Act, and weighting factors under section 1886(d)(4) of such Act for discharges occurring on or after
PPS-exempt hospitals.—
In adjusting target amounts under section 1886(b)(3) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)] for portions of cost reporting periods occurring on or after
ProPAC Study
Clinic Hospital Wage Indices
Limitation on Amounts Paid in Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989
Study of Criteria for Classification of Hospitals as Rural Referral Centers; Report
Grant Program for Rural Health Care Transition
The Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary for Health (or a designee), shall establish a program of grants to assist eligible small rural hospitals and their communities in the planning and implementation of projects to modify the type and extent of services such hospitals provide in order to adjust for one or more of the following factors:
Changes in clinical practice patterns.
Changes in service populations.
Declining demand for acute-care inpatient hospital capacity.
Declining ability to provide appropriate staffing for inpatient hospitals.
Increasing demand for ambulatory and emergency services.
Increasing demand for appropriate integration of community health services.
The need for adequate access (including appropriate transportation) to emergency care and inpatient care in areas in which a significant number of underutilized hospital beds are being eliminated.
The Administrator shall submit a final report on the program to the Congress not later than 180 days after all projects receiving a grant under the program are completed.
Each demonstration project under this subsection shall demonstrate methods of strengthening the financial and managerial capability of the hospital involved to provide necessary services. Such methods may include programs of cooperation with other health care providers, of diversification in services furnished (including the provision of home health services), of physician recruitment, and of improved management systems. Grants under this paragraph may be used to provide instruction and consultation (and such other services as the Administrator determines appropriate) via telecommunications to physicians in such rural areas (within the meaning of section 1886(d)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(D)]) as are designated either class 1 or class 2 health manpower shortage areas under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(1)(A)].
For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘eligible small rural hospital’ means any rural primary care hospital designated by the Secretary under section 1820(i)(2) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(i)(2)], or any non-Federal, short-term general acute care hospital that—
is located in a rural area (as determined in accordance with subsection (d)),
has less than 100 beds, and
is not for profit.
Any eligible small rural hospital that desires to modify the type or extent of health care services that it provides in order to adjust for one or more of the factors specified in paragraph (1) may submit an application to the Administrator and a copy of such application to the Governor of the State in which it is located. The application shall specify the nature of the project proposed by the hospital, the data and information on which the project is based, and a timetable (of not more than 24 months) for completion of the project. The application shall be submitted on or before a date specified by the Administrator and shall be in such form as the Administrator may require.
The Governor shall transmit to the Administrator, within a reasonable time after receiving a copy of an application pursuant to subparagraph (A), any comments with respect to the application that the Governor deems appropriate.
The Governor of a State may designate an appropriate State agency to receive and comment on applications submitted under subparagraph (A).
A hospital shall be considered to be located in a rural area for purposes of this subsection if it is treated as being located in a rural area for purposes of section 1886(d)(3)(D) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(D)].
In determining which hospitals making application under paragraph (3) will receive grants under this subsection, the Administrator shall take into account—
any comments received under paragraph (3)(B) with respect to a proposed project;
the effect that the project will have on—
reducing expenditures from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund,
improving the access of medicare beneficiaries to health care of a reasonable quality;
the extent to which the proposal of the hospital, using appropriate data, demonstrates an understanding of—
the primary market or service area of the hospital, and
the health care needs of the elderly and disabled that are not currently being met by providers in such market or area, and
the degree of coordination that may be expected between the proposed project and—
other local or regional health care providers, and
community and government leaders,
as evidenced by the availability of support for the project (in cash or in kind) and other relevant factors.
A grant to a hospital under this subsection may not exceed $50,000 a year and may not exceed a term of 3 years.
Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), a hospital receiving a grant under this subsection may use the grant for any of expenses incurred in planning and implementing the project with respect to which the grant is made.
A hospital receiving a grant under this subsection for a project may not use the grant to retire debt incurred with respect to any capital expenditure made prior to the date on which the project is initiated.
Not more than one-third of any grant made under this subsection may be expended for capital-related costs (as defined by the Secretary for purposes of section 1886(a)(4) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(4)]) of the project, except that this limitation shall not apply with respect to a grant used for the purposes described in subparagraph (D).
A hospital may use a grant received under this subsection to develop a plan for converting itself to a rural primary care hospital (as described in section 1820 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395i–4]) or to develop a rural health network (as defined in section 1820(g) of such Act) in the State in which it is located if the State is receiving a grant under section 1820(a)(1).
A hospital receiving a grant under this section [amending this section and section 1395tt of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section 1395tt of this title] shall furnish the Administrator with such information as the Administrator may require to evaluate the project with respect to which the grant is made and to ensure that the grant is expended for the purposes for which it was made.
The Administrator shall report to the Congress at least once every 12 months on the program of grants established under this subsection. The report shall assess the functioning and status of the program, shall evaluate the progress made toward achieving the purposes of the program, and shall include any recommendations the Secretary may deem appropriate with respect to the program. In preparing the report, the Secretary shall solicit and include the comments and recommendations of private and public entities with an interest in rural health care.
The Administrator shall submit a final report on the program to the Congress not later than 180 days after all projects receiving a grant under the program are completed.
For purposes of carrying out the program of grants under this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund $15,000,000 for fiscal year 1989, $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992 and $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1993 through 1997.”
Reporting Hospital Information
Development of Data Base.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall develop and place into effect not later than
[Amended subsec. (f) of this section and enacted provisions set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note above.]
Demonstration Project.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide for a demonstration project to develop, and determine the costs and benefits of establishing a uniform system for the reporting by medicare participating hospitals of balance sheet and information described in paragraph (2). In conducting the project, the Secretary shall require hospitals in at least 2 States, one of which maintains a uniform hospital reporting system, to report such information based on standard information established by the Secretary.
The information described in this paragraph is as follows:
Hospital discharges (classified by class of primary payer).
Patient days (classified by class of primary payer).
Licensed beds, staffed beds, and occupancy.
Inpatient charges and revenues (classified by class of primary payer).
Outpatient charges and revenues (classified by class of primary payer).
Inpatient and outpatient hospital expenses (by cost-center classified for operating and capital).
Reasonable costs.
Other income.
Bad debt and charity care.
Capital acquisitions.
Capital assets.
The Secretary shall develop a definition of ‘outpatient visit’ for purposes of reporting hospital information.
The Secretary shall develop the system under subsection (c) in a manner so as—
to facilitate the submittal of the information in the report in an electronic form, and
to be compatible with the needs of the medicare prospective payment system.
The Secretary shall prepare and submit, to the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission, the Comptroller General, the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Finance of the Senate, by not later than 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter, data collected under the system.
In paragraph (2):
The term ‘bad debt and charity care’ has such meaning as the Secretary establishes.
The term ‘class’ means, with respect to payers at least, the programs under this title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.], a State plan approved under title XIX of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.], other third party-payers, and other persons (including self-paying individuals).
The Secretary shall set aside at least a total of $3,000,000 for fiscal years 1988, 1989, and 1990 from existing research funds or from operations funds to develop the format, according to paragraph (1) and for data collection and analysis, but total funds shall not exceed $15,000,000.
The Comptroller General shall analyze the adequacy of the existing system for reporting of hospital information and the costs and benefits of data reporting under the demonstration system and will recommend improvements in hospital data collection and in analysis and display of data in support of policy making.
Consultation.—
The Secretary shall consult representatives of the hospital industry in carrying out the provisions of this section.”
Hospital Outlier Payments and Policy
Increase in outlier payments for burn center drgs.—
In general.—
For discharges classified in diagnosis-related groups relating to burn cases and occurring on or after
Budget neutrality.—
Subparagraph (A) shall be implemented in a manner that ensures that total payments under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act are not increased or decreased by reason of the adjustments required by such subparagraph.
Limitation on changes in outlier regulations.—
In general.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as required to implement specific provisions required under statute, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is not authorized to issue in final form, after the date of the enactment of this Act [
Propac report.—
The chairman of the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission shall report to the Congress and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, by not later than
Report on outlier payments.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall include in the annual report submitted to the Congress pursuant to section 1875(b) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ll(b)] a comparison with respect to hospitals located in an urban area and hospitals located in a rural area in the amount of reductions under section 1886(d)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(B)] and additional payments under section 1886(d)(5)(A) of such Act.”
ProPAC Studies and Reports
Propac reports on study of drg rates for hospitals in rural and urban areas.—
The Prospective Payment Assessment Commission shall evaluate the study conducted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant to section 603(a)(2)(C)(i) of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 [section 603(a)(2)(C)(i) of Pub. L. 98–21, set out below] (relating to the feasibility, impact, and desirability of eliminating or phasing out separate urban and rural DRG prospective payment rates) and report its conclusions and recommendations to the Congress not later than
Propac report on separate urban payment rates.—
The Prospective Payment Assessment Commission shall evaluate the desirability of maintaining separate DRG prospective payment rates for hospitals located in large urban areas (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D)) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(D)]) and in other urban areas, and shall report to Congress on such evaluation not later than
Report on adjustment for non-labor costs.—
The Prospective Payment Assessment Commission shall perform an analysis to determine the feasibility and appropriateness of adjusting the non-wage-related portion of the adjusted average standardized amounts under section 1886(d)(3) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)] based on area differences in hospitals’ costs (other than wage-related costs) and input prices. The Commission shall report to the Congress on such analysis by not later than
Special Rule for Urban Areas in New England
Rural Health Medical Education Demonstration Project
In General.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall enter into agreements with 10 sponsoring hospitals submitting applications under this subsection to conduct demonstration projects to assist resident physicians in developing field clinical experience in rural areas.
Nature of Project.—
Under a demonstration project conducted under subsection (a), a sponsoring hospital entering into an agreement with the Secretary under such subsection shall enter into arrangements with a small rural hospital to provide to such rural hospital, for a period of one to three months of training, physicians (in such number as the agreement under subsection (a) may provide) who have completed one year of residency training.
Selection.—
In selecting from among applications submitted under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that four small rural hospitals located in different counties participate in the demonstration project and that—
two of such hospitals are located in rural counties of more than 2,700 square miles (one of which is east of the Mississippi River and one of which is west of such river); and
two of such hospitals are located in rural counties with (as determined by the Secretary) a severe shortage of physicians (one of which is east of the Mississippi River and one of which is west of such river).
The provisions of paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to applications submitted as a result of amendments made by section 6216 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 [Pub. L. 101–239, amending this note].
Clarification of Payment.—
For purposes of section 1886 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww]—
with respect to subsection (d)(5)(B) of such section, any resident physician participating in the project under subsection (a) for any part of a year shall be treated as if he or she were working at the appropriate sponsoring hospital with an agreement under subsection (a) on September 1 of such year (and shall not be treated as if working at the small rural hospital); and
with respect to subsection (h) of such section, the payment amount permitted under such subsection for a sponsoring hospital with an agreement under subsection (a) shall be increased (for the duration of the project only) by an amount equal to the amount of any direct graduate medical education costs (as defined in paragraph (5) of such subsection (h)) incurred by such hospital in supervising the education and training activities under a project under subsection (a).
Duration of Project.—
Each demonstration project under subsection (a) shall be commenced not later than six months after the date of enactment of this Act [
Definition.—
In this section, the term ‘sponsoring hospital’ means a hospital that receives payments under sections 1886(d)(5)(B) and 1886(h) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B), (h)].”
Prohibition on Policy by Secretary of Health and Human Services To Reduce Expenditures in Fiscal Years 1989, 1990, and 1991
Temporary Extension of Payment Policies for Inpatient Hospital Services
Temporary freeze in pps hospital rates.—
For purposes of subsection (d) of such section for discharges occurring during the period beginning on
Temporary freeze in payment basis.—
Extension of blended drg rate.—
For purposes of subsection (d)(1) of such section, the ‘applicable combined adjusted DRG prospective payment rate’ for discharges occurring—
during the extension period is the rate specified in subsection (d)(1)(D)(ii) of such section, or
after such period is the national adjusted prospective payment rate determined under subsection (d)(3) of such section.
Extension of hospital-specific payment.—
For the first 51 days of a hospital cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1988, payment shall be made under clause (ii) (rather than clause (iii)) of subsection (d)(1)(A) of such section (subject to clause (i) of this subparagraph), the target percentage and DRG percentage shall be those specified in subsection (d)(1)(C)(iv) of such section, and the applicable percentage increase in a hospital’s target amount shall be deemed to be 0 percent.
Temporary freeze in amounts of payment for capital.—
For payments attributable to portions of cost reporting periods occurring during the extension period, the percent specified in subsection (g)(3)(A)(ii) of such section is deemed to be 3.5 percent.
Temporary freeze in return on equity reductions.—
For the first 51 days of a cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 1988, subsection (g)(2) of such section shall be applied as though the applicable percentage were 75 percent.
Temporary freeze in payments rates for pps-exempt hospitals.—
For purposes of payment under subsection (b) of such section for cost reporting periods beginning during fiscal year 1988, with respect to the first 51 days of such a period the applicable percentage increase under paragraph (3)(B) of such subsection is deemed to be 0 percent.”
Freezing Certain Changes in Medicare Payment Regulations and Policies
In general.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is not authorized to issue after
any final regulation that changes the policy with respect to payment under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] to providers of service for reasonable costs relating to unrecovered costs associated with unpaid deductible and coinsurance amounts incurred under such title;
any final regulation, instruction, or other policy change which is primarily intended to have the effect of slowing down claims processing, or delaying payment of claims, under such title; or
any final regulation that changes the policy under such title with respect to payment for a return on equity capital for outpatient hospital services.
The final regulation of the Health Care Financing Administration published on
Other cost savings policies.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as required to implement specific provisions required under statute, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is not authorized to issue in final form, after
Exception.—
Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not be construed to apply to any regulation, instruction, or policy required to implement the amendment made by section 9311(a) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 [section 9311(a) of Pub. L. 99–509, which amended section 1395g of this title] (relating to periodic interim payments).”
Maintaining Current Outlier Policy in Fiscal Year 1987
the proportions under paragraph (3)(B) for hospitals located in urban and rural areas shall be established at such levels as produce the same total dollar reduction under such paragraph as if this section had not been enacted; and
the thresholds and standards used for making additional payments under paragraph (5) of such section shall be the same as those in effect as of
Extension of Regional Referral Center Classification
Budget-Neutral Implementation
Promulgation of New Rate
Miscellaneous Accounting Provision
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of section 1886(d)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(A)], in the case of a hospital that—
had a cost reporting period beginning on September 28, 29, or 30 of 1985,
is located in a State in which inpatient hospital services were paid in fiscal year 1985 pursuant to a Statewide demonstration project under section 402 of the Social Security Amendments of 1967 [section 402 of Pub. L. 90–248, enacting section 1395b–1 of this title and amending section 1395ll of this title] and section 222 of the Social Security Amendments of 1972 [section 222 of Pub. L. 92–603, amending sections 1395b–1 and 1395ll of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1395b–1 of this title], and
elects, by notice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by not later than
during the first 7 months of such cost reporting period the ‘target percentage’ shall be 75 percent and the ‘DRG percentage’ shall be 25 percent, and during the remaining 5 months of such period the ‘target percentage’ and the ‘DRG percentage’ shall each be 50 percent.”
Treatment of Capital-Related Regulations
Prohibition of issuance of final regulations on capital-related costs as part of payment for operating costs before november 21, 1987.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law (except as provided in paragraph (3)), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may not issue, in final form, after
Not including capital-related regulations in budget baseline.—
Any reference in law to a regulation issued in final form or proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration pursuant to sections 1886(b)(3)(B), 1886(d)(3)(A), and 1886(e)(4) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B), (d)(3)(A), (e)(4)] shall not include any regulation issued or proposed with respect to capital-related costs (as defined in paragraph (4)).
Exception.—
Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any regulation issued for the sole purpose of implementing section 1861(v)(1)(O) and 1886(g)(2) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395x(v)(1)(O), 1395ww(g)(2)] and section 1886(g)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(g)(3)(A), (B)] (as amended by section 9303(a) of this Act).
Capital-related costs defined.—
In this subsection, the term ‘capital-related costs’ means those capital-related costs that are specifically excluded, under the second sentence of section 1886(a)(4) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(4)], from the term ‘operating costs of inpatient hospital services’ (as defined in that section) for cost reporting periods beginning prior to
Limitation on Authority To Issue Certain Final Regulations and Instructions Relating to Hospitals or Physicians
Study of Methodology for Area Wage Adjustment for Central Cities; Report to Congress
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission, shall collect information and shall develop one or more methodologies to permit the adjustment of the wage indices used for purposes of sections 1886(d)(2)(C)(ii), 1886(d)(2)(H), and 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(C)(ii), (H), (3)(E)], in order to more accurately reflect hospital labor markets, by taking into account variations in wages and wage-related costs between the central city portion of urban areas and other parts of urban areas.
The Secretary shall report to Congress on the information collected and the methodologies developed under paragraph (1) not later than
Continuation of Medicare Reimbursement Waivers for Certain Hospitals Participating in Regional Hospital Reimbursement Demonstrations
Continuation of Waivers.—
A hospital reimbursement control system which, on
to substantially all non-Federal acute care hospitals (as defined by the Secretary) in the geographic area served by such system on
to the review of at least 75 percent of—
all revenues or expenses in such geographic area for inpatient hospital services, and
revenues or expenses in such geographic area for inpatient hospital services provided under the State’s plan approved under title XIX [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.].
Approval.—
In the case of a hospital cost control system described in subsection (a), the requirements of section 1886(c) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(c)] which apply to States shall instead apply to such system and, for such purposes, any reference to a State is deemed a reference to such system.
Effective Date.—
This section shall become effective on the date of the enactment of this Act [
Information on Impact of PPS Payments on Hospitals
Disclosure of Information.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make available to the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission, the Congressional Budget Office, the Comptroller General, and the Congressional Research Service the most current information on the payments being made under section 1886 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww] to individual hospitals. Such information shall be made available in a manner that permits examination of the impact of such section on hospitals.
Confidentiality.—
Information disclosed under subsection (a) shall be treated as confidential and shall not be subject to further disclosure in a manner that permits the identification of individual hospitals.”
Special Rules for Implementation of Hospital Reimbursement
Waiver of Paperwork Reduction.—
Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, shall not apply to information required for purposes of carrying out this subpart and implementing the amendments made by this subpart [subpart A (§§ 9101–9115) of part 1 of subtitle A of title IX of Pub. L. 99–272, see Tables for classification].
Use of Interim Final Regulations.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue such regulations (on an interim or other basis) as may be necessary to implement this subpart and the amendments made by this subpart.”
Appointment of Additional Members to Prospective Payment Assessment Commission
Studies by Secretary; GAO Study; Report on Uniformity of Approved FTE Resident Amounts; Study on Foreign Medical Graduates; Establishing Physician Identifier System; Paperwork Reduction
Studies by Secretary.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study with respect to approved educational activities relating to nursing and other health professions for which reimbursement is made to hospitals under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.]. The study shall address—
the types and numbers of such programs, and number of students supported or trained under each program;
the fiscal and administrative relationships between the hospitals involved and the schools with which the programs and students are affiliated; and
the types and amounts of expenses of such programs for which reimbursement is made, and the financial and other contributions which accrue to the hospital as a consequence of having such programs.
The Secretary shall report the results of such study to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives prior to
The Secretary shall conduct a separate study of the advisability of continuing or terminating the exception under section 1886(h)(5)(F)(ii) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(5)(F)(ii)] for geriatric residencies and fellowships, and of expanding such exception to cover other educational activities, particularly those which are necessary to meet the projected health care needs of Medicare beneficiaries. Such study shall also examine the adequacy of the supply of faculty in the field of geriatrics. The Secretary shall report the results of such study to the committees described in paragraph (1) prior to
GAO Study.—
The Comptroller General shall conduct a study of the variation in the amounts of payments made under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] with respect to patients in different teaching hospital settings and in the amounts of such payments which are made with respect to patients who are treated in teaching and nonteaching hospital settings. Such study shall identify the components of such payments (including payments with respect to inpatient hospital services, physicians’ services, and capital costs, and, in the case of teaching hospital patients, payments with respect to direct and indirect teaching costs) and shall account, to the extent feasible, for any variations in the amounts of the payment components between teaching and nonteaching settings and among different teaching settings.
In carrying out such study, the Comptroller General may utilize a sample of hospital patients and any other data sources which he deems appropriate, and shall, to the extent feasible, control for differences in severity of illness levels, area wage levels, levels of physician reasonable charges for like services and procedures, and for other factors which could affect the comparability of patients and of payments between teaching and nonteaching settings and among teaching settings. The information obtained in the study shall be coordinated with the information obtained in conducting the study of teaching physicians’ services under section 2307(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 [section 2307(c) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 1395u of this title].
The Comptroller General shall report the results of the study to the committees described in subsection (c)(1) prior to
Report on Uniformity of Approved FTE Resident Amounts.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall report to the committees described in subsection (c)(1), not later than
Study on Foreign Medical Graduates.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall study, and report to the committees described in subsection (c)(1), not later than
the types of services provided;
the cost of providing such services, relative to the cost of other physicians providing the services or other approaches to providing the services;
any deficiencies in the quality of the services provided, and methods of assuring the quality of such services; and
the impact on costs of and access to services if medicare payment for hospitals’ costs of graduate medical education of foreign medical graduates were phased out.
Paperwork Reduction.—
Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, shall not apply to information required for purposes of carrying out this section and the amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 1395x of this title and enacting notes set out under this section and section 1395x of this title].”
Special Treatment of States Formerly Under Waiver
“In the case of a hospital in a State that has had a waiver approved under section 1886(c) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(c)] or section 402 of the Social Security Amendments of 1967 [42 U.S.C. 1395b–1], for cost reporting periods beginning on or after
the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall permit the hospital to change the method by which it allocates administrative and general costs to the direct medical education cost centers to the method specified in the medicare cost report;
the Secretary may make appropriate adjustments in the regional adjusted DRG prospective payment rate (for the region in which the State is located), based on the assumption that all teaching hospitals in the State use the medicare cost report; and
the Secretary shall adjust the hospital-specific portion of payment under section 1886(d) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] for any such hospital that actually chooses to use the medicare cost report.
The Secretary shall implement this subsection based on the best available data.”
Moratorium on Laboratory Payment Demonstrations; Cooperation in Study; Report to Congress
Moratorium.—
Prior to
Cooperation in Study.—
The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Comptroller General shall assist representatives of clinical laboratories in the industry’s conduct of a study to determine whether methods exist which are better than competitive bidding for purposes of utilizing competitive market forces in setting payment levels for laboratory services under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.]. If such a study is conducted by the clinical laboratory industry, the Secretary and the Comptroller General shall comment on such study and submit such comments and the study to the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce.”
Medicare Hospital and Physician Payment Provisions; Extension Period
Maintaining Existing Hospital Payment Rates.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the amount of payment under section 1886 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww] for inpatient hospital services for discharges occurring (and cost reporting periods beginning) during the extension period (as defined in subsection (c)) shall be determined on the same basis as the amount of payment for such services for a discharge occurring on (or the cost reporting period beginning immediately on or before)
Maintaining Existing Payment Rates for Physicians’ Services.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the amount of payment under part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.] for physicians’ services which are furnished during the extension period (as defined in subsection (c)) shall be determined on the same basis as the amount of payment for such services furnished on
Extension Period Defined.—
Hospital payments.—
For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘extension period’ means the period beginning on
Physician payments.—
For purposes of subsection (b), the term ‘extension period’ means the period beginning on
Definition of Hospital Serving Significantly Disproportionate Number of Low-Income Patients or Patients Entitled to Hospital Insurance Benefits for Aged and Disabled; Identification
develop and publish a definition of ‘hospitals that serve a significantly disproportionate number of patients who have low income or are entitled to benefits under part A’ of title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395c et seq.] for purposes of section 1886(d)(5)(C)(i) of that Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(C)(i)], and
identify those hospitals which meet such definition, and make such identity available to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.”
Prospective Payment Wage Index; Studies and Reports to Congress
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall conduct a study to develop an appropriate index for purposes of adjusting payment amounts under section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)] to reflect area differences in average hospital wage levels, as required under paragraphs (2)(H) and (3)(E) of such section [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(H), (3)(E)], taking into account wage differences of full time and part time workers. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall report the results of such study to the Congress not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [
The Secretary shall adjust the payment amounts for hospitals for discharges occurring on or after
The Secretary shall conduct a study and report to the Congress on proposed criteria under which, in the case of a hospital that demonstrates to the Secretary in a current fiscal year that the adjustment being made under paragraph (2)(H) or (3)(E) of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(H), (3)(E)] for that hospital’s discharges in that fiscal year does not accurately reflect the wage levels in the labor market serving the hospital, the Secretary, to the extent he deems appropriate, would modify such adjustment for that hospital for discharges in the subsequent fiscal year to take into account a difference in payment amounts in that current fiscal year to the hospital that resulted from such inaccuracy.”