Phase I sulfur dioxide requirements
Emission limitations
After
Not later than
the product of its baseline multiplied by the lesser of each unit’s allowable 1985 emissions rate and its actual 1985 emissions rate, divided by 2,000, and
the product of each unit’s baseline multiplied by 2.50 lbs/mmBtu divided by 2,000,
and sum the computations. The Administrator shall adjust the foregoing calculation to reflect projected calendar year 1995 utilization of the units subject to the emissions limitations of this subchapter that the Administrator finds would have occurred in the absence of the imposition of such requirements. Pursuant to subsection (d), the Administrator shall allocate allowances from the reserve established hereinunder until the earlier of such time as all such allowances in the reserve are allocated or
In addition to allowances allocated pursuant to paragraph (1), in each calendar year beginning in 1995 and ending in 1999, inclusive, the Administrator shall allocate for each unit on Table A that is located in the States of Illinois, Indiana, or Ohio (other than units at Kyger Creek, Clifty Creek and Joppa Steam), allowances in an amount equal to 200,000 multiplied by the unit’s pro rata share of the total number of allowances allocated for all units on Table A in the 3 States (other than units at Kyger Creek, Clifty Creek, and Joppa Steam) pursuant to paragraph (1). Such allowances shall be excluded from the calculation of the reserve under paragraph (2).
Substitutions
The owner or operator of an affected unit under subsection (a) may include in its section 7651g of this title permit application and proposed compliance plan a proposal to reassign, in whole or in part, the affected unit’s sulfur dioxide reduction requirements to any other unit(s) under the control of such owner or operator. Such proposal shall specify—
the designation of the substitute unit or units to which any part of the reduction obligations of subsection (a) shall be required, in addition to, or in lieu of, any original affected units designated under such subsection;
the original affected unit’s baseline, the actual and allowable 1985 emissions rate for sulfur dioxide, and the authorized annual allowance allocation stated in table A;
calculation of the annual average tonnage for calendar years 1985, 1986, and 1987, emitted by the substitute unit or units, based on the baseline for each unit, as defined in section 7651a(d) 1
the emissions rates and tonnage limitations that would be applicable to the original and substitute affected units under the substitution proposal;
documentation, to the satisfaction of the Administrator, that the reassigned tonnage limits will, in total, achieve the same or greater emissions reduction than would have been achieved by the original affected unit and the substitute unit or units without such substitution; and
such other information as the Administrator may require.
Administrator’s action on substitution proposals
The Administrator shall take final action on such substitution proposal in accordance with section 7651g(c) of this title if the substitution proposal fulfills the requirements of this subsection. The Administrator may approve a substitution proposal in whole or in part and with such modifications or conditions as may be consistent with the orderly functioning of the allowance system and which will ensure the emissions reductions contemplated by this subchapter. If a proposal does not meet the requirements of subsection (b), the Administrator shall disapprove it. The owner or operator of a unit listed in table A shall not substitute another unit or units without the prior approval of the Administrator.
Upon approval of a substitution proposal, each substitute unit, and each source with such unit, shall be deemed affected under this subchapter, and the Administrator shall issue a permit to the original and substitute affected source and unit in accordance with the approved substitution plan and section 7651g of this title. The Administrator shall allocate allowances for the original and substitute affected units in accordance with the approved substitution proposal pursuant to section 7651b of this title. It shall be unlawful for any source or unit that is allocated allowances pursuant to this section to emit sulfur dioxide in excess of the emissions limitation provided for in the approved substitution permit and plan unless the owner or operator of each unit governed by the permit and approved substitution plan holds allowances to emit not less than the units 2
Eligible phase I extension units
The owner or operator of any affected unit subject to an emissions limitation requirement under this section may petition the Administrator in its permit application under section 7651g of this title for an extension of 2 years of the deadline for meeting such requirement, provided that the owner or operator of any such unit holds allowances to emit not less than the unit’s total annual emissions for each of the 2 years of the period of extension. To qualify for such an extension, the affected unit must either employ a qualifying phase I technology, or transfer its phase I emissions reduction obligation to a unit employing a qualifying phase I technology. Such transfer shall be accomplished in accordance with a compliance plan, submitted and approved under section 7651g of this title, that shall govern operations at all units included in the transfer, and that specifies the emissions reduction requirements imposed pursuant to this subchapter.
Such extension proposal shall—
specify the unit or units proposed for designation as an eligible phase I extension unit;
provide a copy of an executed contract, which may be contingent upon the Administrator approving the proposal, for the design engineering, and construction of the qualifying phase I technology for the extension unit, or for the unit or units to which the extension unit’s emission reduction obligation is to be transferred;
specify the unit’s or units’ baseline, actual 1985 emissions rate, allowable 1985 emissions rate, and projected utilization for calendar years 1995 through 1999;
require CEMS on both the eligible phase I extension unit or units and the transfer unit or units beginning no later than
specify the emission limitation and number of allowances expected to be necessary for annual operation after the qualifying phase I technology has been installed.
The Administrator shall review and take final action on each extension proposal in order of receipt, consistent with section 7651g of this title, and for an approved proposal shall designate the unit or units as an eligible phase I extension unit. The Administrator may approve an extension proposal in whole or in part, and with such modifications or conditions as may be necessary, consistent with the orderly functioning of the allowance system, and to ensure the emissions reductions contemplated by the 3
In order to determine the number of proposals eligible for allocations from the reserve under subsection (a)(2) and the number of allowances remaining available after each proposal is acted upon, the Administrator shall reduce the total number of allowances remaining available in the reserve by the number of allowances calculated according to subparagraphs (A), (B) and (C) until either no allowances remain available in the reserve for further allocation or all approved proposals have been acted upon. If no allowances remain available in the reserve for further allocation before all proposals have been acted upon by the Administrator, any pending proposals shall be disapproved. The Administrator shall calculate allowances equal to—
the difference between the lesser of the average annual emissions in calendar years 1988 and 1989 or the projected emissions tonnage for calendar year 1995 of each eligible phase I extension unit, as designated under paragraph (3), and the product of the unit’s baseline multiplied by an emission rate of 2.50 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000;
the difference between the lesser of the average annual emissions in calendar years 1988 and 1989 or the projected emissions tonnage for calendar year 1996 of each eligible phase I extension unit, as designated under paragraph (3), and the product of the unit’s baseline multiplied by an emission rate of 2.50 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000; and
the amount by which (i) the product of each unit’s baseline multiplied by an emission rate of 1.20 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000, exceeds (ii) the tonnage level specified under subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2) of this subsection multiplied by a factor of 3.
Each eligible Phase I extension unit shall receive allowances determined under subsection (a)(1) or (c) of this section. In addition, for calendar year 1995, the Administrator shall allocate to each eligible Phase I extension unit, from the allowance reserve created pursuant to subsection (a)(2), allowances equal to the difference between the lesser of the average annual emissions in calendar years 1988 and 1989 or its projected emissions tonnage for calendar year 1995 and the product of the unit’s baseline multiplied by an emission rate of 2.50 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000. In calendar year 1996, the Administrator shall allocate for each eligible unit, from the allowance reserve created pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of this section, allowances equal to the difference between the lesser of the average annual emissions in calendar years 1988 and 1989 or its projected emissions tonnage for calendar year 1996 and the product of the unit’s baseline multiplied by an emission rate of 2.50 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000. It shall be unlawful for any source or unit subject to an approved extension plan under this subsection to emit sulfur dioxide in excess of the emissions limitations provided for in the permit and approved extension plan, unless the owner or operator of each unit governed by the permit and approved plan holds allowances to emit not less than the unit’s total annual emissions.
In addition to allowances specified in paragraph (5), the Administrator shall allocate for each eligible Phase I extension unit employing qualifying Phase I technology, for calendar years 1997, 1998, and 1999, additional allowances, from any remaining allowances in the reserve created pursuant to subsection (a)(2), following the reduction in the reserve provided for in paragraph (4), not to exceed the amount by which (A) the product of each eligible unit’s baseline times an emission rate of 1.20 lbs/mmBtu, divided by 2,000, exceeds (B) the tonnage level specified under subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2) of this subsection.
After
Allocation of allowances
In the case of a unit that receives authorization from the Governor of the State in which such unit is located to make reductions in the emissions of sulfur dioxide prior to calendar year 1995 and that is part of a utility system that meets the following requirements: (A) the total coal-fired generation within the utility system as a percentage of total system generation decreased by more than 20 percent between
In the case of an affected unit under this section described in subparagraph (A),4
In no event shall the provisions of this paragraph 5
|
Table A.—Affected Sources and Units in Phase I and Their Sulfur Dioxide Allowances (tons) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
State | Plant Name | Generator | Phase I Allowances |
Alabama | Colbert | 1 2 3 4 5 | 13,570 15,310 15,400 15,410 37,180 |
E.C. Gaston | 1 2 3 4 5 | 18,100 18,540 18,310 19,280 59,840 | |
Florida | Big Bend | 1 2 3 | 28,410 27,100 26,740 |
Crist | 6 7 | 19,200 31,680 | |
Georgia | Bowen | 1 2 3 4 | 56,320 54,770 71,750 71,740 |
Hammond | 1 2 3 4 | 8,780 9,220 8,910 37,640 | |
J. McDonough | 1 2 | 19,910 20,600 | |
Wansley | 1 2 | 70,770 65,430 | |
Yates | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | 7,210 7,040 6,950 8,910 9,410 24,760 21,480 | |
Illinois | Baldwin | 1 2 3 | 42,010 44,420 42,550 |
Coffeen | 1 2 | 11,790 35,670 | |
Grand Tower | 4 | 5,910 | |
Hennepin | 2 | 18,410 | |
Joppa Steam | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 12,590 10,770 12,270 11,360 11,420 10,620 | |
Kincaid | 1 2 | 31,530 33,810 | |
Meredosia | 3 | 13,890 | |
Vermilion | 2 | 8,880 | |
Indiana | Bailly | 7 8 | 11,180 15,630 |
Breed | 1 | 18,500 | |
Cayuga | 1 2 | 33,370 34,130 | |
Clifty Creek | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 20,150 19,810 20,410 20,080 19,360 20,380 | |
E. W. Stout | 5 6 7 | 3,880 4,770 23,610 | |
F. B. Culley | 2 3 | 4,290 16,970 | |
F. E. Ratts | 1 2 | 8,330 8,480 | |
Gibson | 1 2 3 4 | 40,400 41,010 41,080 40,320 | |
H. T. Pritchard | 6 | 5,770 | |
Michigan City | 12 | 23,310 | |
Petersburg | 1 2 | 16,430 32,380 | |
R. Gallagher | 1 2 3 4 | 6,490 7,280 6,530 7,650 | |
Tanners Creek | 4 | 24,820 | |
Wabash River | 1 2 3 5 6 | 4,000 2,860 3,750 3,670 12,280 | |
Warrick | 4 | 26,980 | |
Iowa | Burlington | 1 | 10,710 |
Des Moines | 7 | 2,320 | |
George Neal | 1 | 1,290 | |
M.L. Kapp | 2 | 13,800 | |
Prairie Creek | 4 | 8,180 | |
Riverside | 5 | 3,990 | |
Kansas | Quindaro | 2 | 4,220 |
Kentucky | Coleman | 1 2 3 | 11,250 12,840 12,340 |
Cooper | 1 2 | 7,450 15,320 | |
E.W. Brown | 1 2 3 | 7,110 10,910 26,100 | |
Elmer Smith | 1 2 | 6,520 14,410 | |
Ghent | 1 | 28,410 | |
Green River | 4 | 7,820 | |
H.L. Spurlock | 1 | 22,780 | |
Henderson II | 1 2 | 13,340 12,310 | |
Paradise | 3 | 59,170 | |
Shawnee | 10 | 10,170 | |
Maryland | Chalk Point | 1 2 | 21,910 24,330 |
C. P. Crane | 1 2 | 10,330 9,230 | |
Morgantown | 1 2 | 35,260 38,480 | |
Michigan | J. H. Campbell | 1 2 | 19,280 23,060 |
Minnesota | High Bridge | 6 | 4,270 |
Mississippi | Jack Watson | 4 5 | 17,910 36,700 |
Missouri | Asbury | 1 | 16,190 |
James River | 5 | 4,850 | |
Labadie | 1 2 3 4 | 40,110 37,710 40,310 35,940 | |
Montrose | 1 2 3 | 7,390 8,200 10,090 | |
New Madrid | 1 2 | 28,240 32,480 | |
Sibley | 3 | 15,580 | |
Sioux | 1 2 | 22,570 23,690 | |
Thomas Hill | 1 2 | 10,250 19,390 | |
New Hampshire | Merrimack | 1 2 | 10,190 22,000 |
New Jersey | B.L. England | 1 2 | 9,060 11,720 |
New York | Dunkirk | 3 4 | 12,600 14,060 |
Greenidge | 4 | 7,540 | |
Milliken | 1 2 | 11,170 12,410 | |
Northport | 1 2 3 | 19,810 24,110 26,480 | |
Port Jefferson | 3 4 | 10,470 12,330 | |
Ohio | Ashtabula | 5 | 16,740 |
Avon Lake | 8 9 | 11,650 30,480 | |
Cardinal | 1 2 | 34,270 38,320 | |
Conesville | 1 2 3 4 | 4,210 4,890 5,500 48,770 | |
Eastlake | 1 2 3 4 5 | 7,800 8,640 10,020 14,510 34,070 | |
Edgewater | 4 | 5,050 | |
Gen. J.M. Gavin | 1 2 | 79,080 80,560 | |
Kyger Creek | 1 2 3 4 5 | 19,280 18,560 17,910 18,710 18,740 | |
Miami Fort | 5 6 7 | 760 11,380 38,510 | |
Muskingum River | 1 2 3 4 5 | 14,880 14,170 13,950 11,780 40,470 | |
Niles | 1 2 | 6,940 9,100 | |
Picway | 5 | 4,930 | |
R.E. Burger | 3 4 5 | 6,150 10,780 12,430 | |
W.H. Sammis | 5 6 7 | 24,170 39,930 43,220 | |
W.C. Beckjord | 5 6 | 8,950 23,020 | |
Pennsylvania | Armstrong | 1 2 | 14,410 15,430 |
Brunner Island | 1 2 3 | 27,760 31,100 53,820 | |
Cheswick | 1 | 39,170 | |
Conemaugh | 1 2 | 59,790 66,450 | |
Hatfield’s Ferry | 1 2 3 | 37,830 37,320 40,270 | |
Martins Creek | 1 2 | 12,660 12,820 | |
Portland | 1 2 | 5,940 10,230 | |
Shawville | 1 2 3 4 | 10,320 10,320 14,220 14,070 | |
Sunbury | 3 4 | 8,760 11,450 | |
Tennessee | Allen | 1 2 3 | 15,320 16,770 15,670 |
Cumberland | 1 2 | 86,700 94,840 | |
Gallatin | 1 2 3 4 | 17,870 17,310 20,020 21,260 | |
Johnsonville | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | 7,790 8,040 8,410 7,990 8,240 7,890 8,980 8,700 7,080 7,550 | |
West Virginia | Albright | 3 | 12,000 |
Fort Martin | 1 2 | 41,590 41,200 | |
Harrison | 1 2 3 | 48,620 46,150 41,500 | |
Kammer | 1 2 3 | 18,740 19,460 17,390 | |
Mitchell | 1 2 | 43,980 45,510 | |
Mount Storm | 1 2 3 | 43,720 35,580 42,430 | |
Wisconsin | Edgewater | 4 | 24,750 |
La Crosse/Genoa | 3 | 22,700 | |
Nelson Dewey | 1 2 | 6,010 6,680 | |
N. Oak Creek | 1 2 3 4 | 5,220 5,140 5,370 6,320 | |
Pulliam | 8 | 7,510 | |
S. Oak Creek | 5 6 7 8 | 9,670 12,040 16,180 15,790 |
Energy conservation and renewable energy
Definitions
As used in this subsection:
Qualified energy conservation measure
Qualified renewable energy
Electric utility
Allowances for emissions avoided through energy conservation and renewable energy
In general
Requirements for issuance
The Administrator shall allocate allowances to an electric utility under this subsection only if all of the following requirements are met:
Such electric utility is paying for the qualified energy conservation measures or qualified renewable energy directly or through purchase from another person.
The emissions of sulfur dioxide avoided through the use of qualified energy conservation measures or qualified renewable energy are quantified in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Administrator under this subsection.
Such electric utility has adopted and is implementing a least cost energy conservation and electric power plan which evaluates a range of resources, including new power supplies, energy conservation, and renewable energy resources, in order to meet expected future demand at the lowest system cost.
The qualified energy conservation measures or qualified renewable energy, or both, are consistent with that plan.
Electric utilities subject to the jurisdiction of a State regulatory authority must have such plan approved by such authority. For electric utilities not subject to the jurisdiction of a State regulatory authority such plan shall be approved by the entity with rate-making authority for such utility.
In the case of qualified energy conservation measures undertaken by a State regulated electric utility, the Secretary of Energy certifies that the State regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the electric rates of such electric utility has established rates and charges which ensure that the net income of such electric utility after implementation of specific cost effective energy conservation measures is at least as high as such net income would have been if the energy conservation measures had not been implemented. Upon the date of any such certification by the Secretary of Energy, all allowances which, but for this paragraph, would have been allocated under subparagraph (A) before such date, shall be allocated to the electric utility. This clause is not a requirement for qualified renewable energy.
Such utility or any subsidiary of the utility’s holding company owns or operates at least one affected unit.
Period of applicability
Determination of avoided emissions
88 So in original. There is no cl. (ii). Application
In order to receive allowances under this subsection, an electric utility shall make an application which—
designates the qualified energy conservation measures implemented and the qualified renewable energy sources used for purposes of avoiding emissions,9
calculates, in accordance with subparagraphs (F) and (G), the number of tons of emissions avoided by reason of the implementation of such measures or the use of such renewable energy sources; and
demonstrates that the requirements of subparagraph (B) have been met.
Such application for allowances by a State-regulated electric utility shall require approval by the State regulatory authority with jurisdiction over such electric utility. The authority shall review the application for accuracy and compliance with this subsection and the rules under this subsection. Electric utilities whose retail rates are not subject to the jurisdiction of a State regulatory authority shall apply directly to the Administrator for such approval.
Avoided emissions from qualified energy conservation measures
For the purposes of this subsection, the emission tonnage deemed avoided by reason of the implementation of qualified energy conservation measures for any calendar year shall be a tonnage equal to the product of multiplying—
the kilowatt hours that would otherwise have been supplied by the utility during such year in the absence of such qualified energy conservation measures, by
0.004,
and dividing by 2,000.
Avoided emissions from the use of qualified renewable energy
The emissions tonnage deemed avoided by reason of the use of qualified renewable energy by an electric utility for any calendar year shall be a tonnage equal to the product of multiplying—
the actual kilowatt hours generated by, or purchased from, qualified renewable energy, by
0.004,
and dividing by 2,000.
Prohibitions
No allowances shall be allocated under this subsection for the implementation of programs that are exclusively informational or educational in nature.
No allowances shall be allocated for energy conservation measures or renewable energy that were operational before
Savings provision
Regulations
Conservation and Renewable Energy Reserve
Alternative allowance allocation for units in certain utility systems with optional baseline
Optional baseline for units in certain systems
In the case of a unit subject to the emissions limitation requirements of this section which (as of
has an emission rate below 1.0 lbs/mmBtu,
has decreased its sulfur dioxide emissions rate by 60 percent or greater since 1980, and
is part of a utility system which has a weighted average sulfur dioxide emissions rate for all fossil fueled-fired units below 1.0 lbs/mmBtu,
at the election of the owner or operator of such unit, the unit’s baseline may be calculated (i) as provided under section 7651a(d) 10