Findings
Congress finds that—
aviation noise management is crucial to the continued increase in airport capacity;
community noise concerns have led to uncoordinated and inconsistent restrictions on aviation that could impede the national air transportation system;
a noise policy must be carried out at the national level;
local interest in aviation noise management shall be considered in determining the national interest;
community concerns can be alleviated through the use of new technology aircraft and the use of revenues, including those available from passenger facility charges, for noise management;
revenues controlled by the United States Government can help resolve noise problems and carry with them a responsibility to the national airport system;
revenues derived from a passenger facility charge may be applied to noise management and increased airport capacity; and
a precondition to the establishment and collection of a passenger facility charge is the prescribing by the Secretary of Transportation of a regulation establishing procedures for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on operations of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft.
Source
(Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e),Notes
|
Historical and Revision Notes |
||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
47521 | 49 App.:2151. | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, § 9302, 104 Stat. 1388–378. |