Chesapeake Bay
Definitions
In this section, the following definitions apply:
Administrative cost
Chesapeake Bay Agreement
Chesapeake Bay ecosystem
Chesapeake Bay Program
Chesapeake Executive Council
Signatory jurisdiction
Continuation of Chesapeake Bay Program
In general
Program Office
In general
Function
The Chesapeake Bay Program Office shall provide support to the Chesapeake Executive Council by—
implementing and coordinating science, research, modeling, support services, monitoring, data collection, and other activities that support the Chesapeake Bay Program;
developing and making available, through publications, technical assistance, and other appropriate means, information pertaining to the environmental quality and living resources of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem;
in cooperation with appropriate Federal, State, and local authorities, assisting the signatories to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement in developing and implementing specific action plans to carry out the responsibilities of the signatories to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement;
coordinating the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency with the actions of the appropriate officials of other Federal agencies and State and local authorities in developing strategies to—
improve the water quality and living resources in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem; and
obtain the support of the appropriate officials of the agencies and authorities in achieving the objectives of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement; and
implementing outreach programs for public information, education, and participation to foster stewardship of the resources of the Chesapeake Bay.
Interagency agreements
Technical assistance and assistance grants
In general
Federal share
In general
Small watershed grants program
Non-Federal share
Administrative costs
Implementation and monitoring grants
In general
If a signatory jurisdiction has approved and committed to implement all or substantially all aspects of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, on the request of the chief executive of the jurisdiction, the Administrator—
shall make a grant to the jurisdiction for the purpose of implementing the management mechanisms established under the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, subject to such terms and conditions as the Administrator considers appropriate; and
may make a grant to a signatory jurisdiction for the purpose of monitoring the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.
Proposals
In general
Contents
A proposal under subparagraph (A) shall include—
a description of proposed management mechanisms that the jurisdiction commits to take within a specified time period, such as reducing or preventing pollution in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed or meeting applicable water quality standards or established goals and objectives under the Chesapeake Bay Agreement; and
the estimated cost of the actions proposed to be taken during the fiscal year.
Approval
Federal share
Non-Federal share
Administrative costs
Reporting
On or before October 1 of each fiscal year, the Administrator shall make available to the public a document that lists and describes, in the greatest practicable degree of detail—
all projects and activities funded for the fiscal year;
the goals and objectives of projects funded for the previous fiscal year; and
the net benefits of projects funded for previous fiscal years.
Federal facilities and budget coordination
Subwatershed planning and restoration
Compliance with agreement
Budget coordination
In general
Disclosure to the Council
Chesapeake Bay Program
Management strategies
The Administrator, in coordination with other members of the Chesapeake Executive Council, shall ensure that management plans are developed and implementation is begun by signatories to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement to achieve and maintain—
the nutrient goals of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement for the quantity of nitrogen and phosphorus entering the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed;
the water quality requirements necessary to restore living resources in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem;
the Chesapeake Bay Basinwide Toxins Reduction and Prevention Strategy goal of reducing or eliminating the input of chemical contaminants from all controllable sources to levels that result in no toxic or bioaccumulative impact on the living resources of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem or on human health;
habitat restoration, protection, creation, and enhancement goals established by Chesapeake Bay Agreement signatories for wetlands, riparian forests, and other types of habitat associated with the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem; and
the restoration, protection, creation, and enhancement goals established by the Chesapeake Bay Agreement signatories for living resources associated with the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.
Small watershed grants program
The Administrator, in cooperation with the Chesapeake Executive Council, shall—
establish a small watershed grants program as part of the Chesapeake Bay Program; and
offer technical assistance and assistance grants under subsection (d) to local governments and nonprofit organizations and individuals in the Chesapeake Bay region to implement—
cooperative tributary basin strategies that address the water quality and living resource needs in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem; and
locally based protection and restoration programs or projects within a watershed that complement the tributary basin strategies, including the creation, restoration, protection, or enhancement of habitat associated with the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.
Study of Chesapeake Bay Program
In general
Requirements
The study and report shall—
assess the state of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem;
compare the current state of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem with its state in 1975, 1985, and 1995;
assess the effectiveness of management strategies being implemented on
make recommendations for the improved management of the Chesapeake Bay Program either by strengthening strategies being implemented on
be presented in such a format as to be readily transferable to and usable by other watershed restoration programs.
Special study of living resource response
In general
Requirements
The study shall—
determine the current status and trends of living resources, including grasses, benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, fish, and shellfish;
establish to the extent practicable the rates of recovery of the living resources in response to improved water quality condition;
evaluate and assess interactions of species, with particular attention to the impact of changes within and among trophic levels; and
recommend management actions to optimize the return of a healthy and balanced ecosystem in response to improvements in the quality and character of the waters of the Chesapeake Bay.
Annual survey
Authorization of appropriations
Source
(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, § 117, as added Pub. L. 100–4, title I, § 103,Notes
Codification
Amendments
Chesapeake Bay Accountability and Recovery
SHORT TITLE.
DEFINITIONS.
“In this Act:
Administrator.—
The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Chesapeake bay state.—
The term ‘Chesapeake Bay State’ or ‘State’ means any of—
the States of Maryland, West Virginia, Delaware, and New York;
the Commonwealths of Virginia and Pennsylvania; and
the District of Columbia.
Chesapeake bay watershed.—
The term ‘Chesapeake Bay watershed’ means all tributaries, backwaters, and side channels, including watersheds, draining into the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake executive council.—
The term ‘Chesapeake Executive Council’ has the meaning given the term by section 117(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1267(a)).
Chief executive.—
The term ‘chief executive’ means, in the case of a State or Commonwealth, the Governor of the State or Commonwealth and, in the case of the District of Columbia, the Mayor of the District of Columbia.
Director.—
The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Federal restoration activity.—
In general.—
The term ‘Federal restoration activity’ means a Federal program or project carried out under Federal authority in existence as of the date of enactment of this Act [
Categorization.—
Federal restoration activities may be categorized as follows:
Physical restoration.
Planning.
Feasibility studies.
Scientific research.
Monitoring.
Education.
Infrastructure development.
State restoration activity.—
In general.—
The term ‘State restoration activity’ means any State program or project carried out under State authority that directly or indirectly protect[s], conserve[s], or restore[s] living resources, habitat, water resources, or water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, including programs or projects that promote responsible land use, stewardship, and community engagement in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Categorization.—
State restoration activities may be categorized as follows:
Physical restoration.
Planning.
Feasibility studies.
Scientific research.
Monitoring.
Education.
Infrastructure development.
CHESAPEAKE BAY CROSSCUT BUDGET.
In General.—
The Director, in consultation with the Chesapeake Executive Council, the chief executive of each Chesapeake Bay State, and the Chesapeake Bay Commission, shall submit to Congress a financial report containing—
an interagency crosscut budget that displays, as applicable—
the proposed funding for any Federal restoration activity to be carried out in the succeeding fiscal year, including any planned interagency or intra-agency transfer, for each of the Federal agencies that carry out restoration activities;
to the extent that information is available, the estimated funding for any State restoration activity to be carried out in the succeeding fiscal year;
all expenditures for Federal restoration activities from the preceding 2 fiscal years, the current fiscal year, and the succeeding fiscal year;
all expenditures, to the extent that information is available, for State restoration activities during the equivalent time period described in subparagraph (C); and
a section that identifies and evaluates, based on need and appropriateness, specific opportunities to consolidate similar programs and activities within the budget and recommendations to Congress for legislative action to streamline, consolidate, or eliminate similar programs and activities within the budget;
a detailed accounting of all funds received and obligated by each Federal agency for restoration activities during the current and preceding fiscal years, including the identification of funds that were transferred to a Chesapeake Bay State for restoration activities;
to the extent that information is available, a detailed accounting from each State of all funds received and obligated from a Federal agency for restoration activities during the current and preceding fiscal years; and
a description of each of the proposed Federal and State restoration activities to be carried out in the succeeding fiscal year (corresponding to those activities listed in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1)), including—
the project description;
the current status of the project;
the Federal or State statutory or regulatory authority, program, or responsible agency;
the authorization level for appropriations;
the project timeline, including benchmarks;
references to project documents;
descriptions of risks and uncertainties of project implementation;
a list of coordinating entities;
a description of the funding history for the project;
cost sharing; and
alignment with the existing Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Chesapeake Executive Council goals and priorities, and Annual Action Plan required by section 205 of Executive Order 13508 (33 U.S.C. 1267 note; relating to Chesapeake Bay protection and restoration).
Minimum Funding Levels.—
In describing restoration activities in the report required under subsection (a), the Director shall only include—
for the first 3 years that the report is required, descriptions of—
Federal restoration activities that have funding amounts greater than or equal to $300,000; and
State restoration activities that have funding amounts greater than or equal to $300,000; and
for every year thereafter, descriptions of—
Federal restoration activities that have funding amounts greater than or equal to $100,000; and
State restoration activities that have funding amounts greater than or equal to $100,000.
Deadline.—
The Director shall submit to Congress the report required by subsection (a) not later than September 30 of each year.
Report.—
Copies of the report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations, Natural Resources, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Appropriations, Environment and Public Works, and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
Effective Date.—
This section shall apply beginning with the first fiscal year after the date of enactment of this Act [
INDEPENDENT EVALUATOR FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM.
In General.—
There shall be an Independent Evaluator for restoration activities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, who shall review and report on—
restoration activities; and
any related topics that are suggested by the Chesapeake Executive Council.
Appointment.—
In general.—
Not later than 30 days after the date of submission of nominees by the Chesapeake Executive Council, the Independent Evaluator shall be appointed by the Administrator from among nominees submitted by the Chesapeake Executive Council with the consultation of the scientific community.
Nominations.—
The Chesapeake Executive Council may nominate for consideration as Independent Evaluator a science-based institution of higher education.
Requirements.—
The Administrator shall only select as Independent Evaluator a nominee that the Administrator determines demonstrates excellence in marine science, policy evaluation, or other studies relating to complex environmental restoration activities.
Reports.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of appointment and once every 2 years thereafter, the Independent Evaluator shall submit to Congress a report describing the findings and recommendations of reviews conducted under subsection (a).
PROHIBITION ON NEW FUNDING.
Findings and Purposes
Findings.—
Congress finds that—
the Chesapeake Bay is a national treasure and a resource of worldwide significance;
over many years, the productivity and water quality of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed were diminished by pollution, excessive sedimentation, shoreline erosion, the impacts of population growth and development in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and other factors;
the Federal Government (acting through the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency), the Governor of the State of Maryland, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Chairperson of the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and the mayor of the District of Columbia, as Chesapeake Bay Agreement signatories, have committed to a comprehensive cooperative program to achieve improved water quality and improvements in the productivity of living resources of the Bay;
the cooperative program described in paragraph (3) serves as a national and international model for the management of estuaries; and
there is a need to expand Federal support for monitoring, management, and restoration activities in the Chesapeake Bay and the tributaries of the Bay in order to meet and further the original and subsequent goals and commitments of the Chesapeake Bay Program.
Purposes.—
The purposes of this title [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1251 of this title] are—
to expand and strengthen cooperative efforts to restore and protect the Chesapeake Bay; and
to achieve the goals established in the Chesapeake Bay Agreement.”
Nutrient Loading Resulting From Dredged Material Disposal
Study.—
The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient loading that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged material into open-water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
Report.—
Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [